Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 24

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< June 23 June 25 >

June 24

Template:Olddelrev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was merge to

Template:Olddelrev. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Propose merging

Template:Olddrvfull
.
No reason for two of these. Merge them for simplicity. Steel1943 (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Batsmen with a T20I strike rate above 140

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to similar template deletion,

Cricinfo
– it is very useful for statistics. Otherwise, WP don't need such templates.

Per WP:NAVBOX template should meet: I. It should have an article on the topic, and should be based on a coherent subject. II. Subject of the template should be discussed on every article. Störm (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course strike rate is widely used. It is widely recognised that strike-rate is more important than average in the T20 format. StAnselm (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2015 AFC Cup Group A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at

WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Metro Transit station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template duplicated some of the functionality of {{

WP:USSTATIONS no articles were named according to the convention it supported. All the transclusions were via the redirect {{MTs}}, which I've now pointed at Module:Adjacent stations/Metro (Minnesota). Mackensen (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

No objections. Useddenim (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 21:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:University of Puget Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox with a whopping one linked article and three total transclusions. How has this stayed like this for five years?

t • c) 07:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_24&oldid=905572231"