Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 14

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< December 13 December 15 >

December 14

Template:Unit plural discussion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed because the discussion it mentions is from years ago. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep pending a valid
    deletion reason. This is a normal WikiProject notice, noting that the WikiProject in question is defunct. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    @Jonesey95: It's not a WikiProject notice; It was a talk page notice about a discussion from 2017. As for a deletion reason, although it has transclusions, it's entirely blank and has been for two weeks, so it's functionally unused and pointless because the discussion is over. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I misinterpreted the page when I went to one of the talk pages. Delete this blank, expired notice linking to a discussion that ran its course. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I blanked the template a couple weeks ago, because it had text in it saying it could be blanked once the discussion it pointed to was closed. That discussion closed years ago; there is no further need for the template. --Srleffler (talk) 02:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:United States House of Representatives elections imagemap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was userify to

(non-admin closure) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Unused and doesn't display the map it intends to show. But a map of the election results is already featured on respective House of Representative articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I was trying to make a 'clickable map' that resembles the infobox maps on Presidential election pages, and was waiting until redistricting process for the 2022 cycle is completed which might end sometime mid-2022. Though my request is to not delete, I wouldn't oppose deletion if the greater consensus is to delete. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 17:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • move to userspace since the author wishes to continue working on it. Frietjes (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Country data Ottoman Empire old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not an actual country data template. One already exists for the Ottoman Empire. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:IPE Aeronaves Aircraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of Template:IPE Aeronaves. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Caribbean Canadian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant as navboxes for the respective diaspora communities have the same articles in this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Qliphoth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Unused and the sidebar for the main topic as well as the category connects all the links in this template already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:NXT United Kingdom Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only 4 entries, unnecessary for a nav box — Czello 20:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:NXT UK Women's Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only four entries, not necessary for a nav box — Czello 20:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CS Mioveni seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused and has only redlinks. The blue links seasons at CS Mioveni link to individual seasons in leagues, not to this team. Therefore, this template isn't needed yet as there are no bluelink articles. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DMT color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The color values are already present at Module:Adjacent stations/DTRO and usages should be replaced with {{Rail color|DTRO|1}}, {{Rail color|DTRO|2}} or {{Rail color|DTRO|3}}. Gonnym (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:NBL Coaches 2019-20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Probably should be substituted on a relevant article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only place it could go is 2019–20 NBL season so it could be placed there and see if it survives. Gonnym (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the table on
    WP:NOTSTATS. So no point trying to subst it somewhere, just delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Delete per Joseph2302. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:July 2013 beirut bombing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a real template. Probably was a test. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete via G2. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a valid template, probably a speedy criteria like G2 applies too. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Union councils of Magura District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Nothing but red links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Rus Despatch Rugby Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. No mainspace article for it to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as creator, I think I created this in error and forget to speedy. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Linescore Soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no categories, no documentation. Only substantive edit was creation in 2007. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Lifespan of each President of India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline chart. Not really a subject that can be used or contains any vital information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral — I created this, and I am neutral on its deletion. It was created during my early Wikipedia days for a page which got deleted a few months ago. No strong feelings either side, but I think this may be useful if added in the 'Statistics' section of List of presidents of India. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or subst to List of presidents of India and let it survive on its own. Gonnym (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Human rights in Asia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to the Asia topic template that already includes the same links and transcluded across multiple articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, redundant to {{Asia topic|prefix=Human rights in}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South Omaha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as all articles are related to the city of Omaha with respective navboxes. A navbox for the neighborhood isn't necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, largely overlaps the main Omaha navbox. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CO lines and related orphaned color/lines/stations train templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced and orphaned as part of the migration to {{Adjacent stations}}. If one or more of these templates has been nominated in error because its name is similar to the train color/lines/stations templates, I will be happy to remove it from this nomination. If any of these templates were created with the intention of using them but editors haven't gotten around to it yet, {{Adjacent stations}} should be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Gonnym (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Disrupted discussion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 21. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2020 Australian Paralympic Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and malformed. Doesn't include any notable teams as none of the teams were selected. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Composition bar original

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Only edit is creation in 2017. Appears to be an abandoned experiment related to the widely used {{Composition bar}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no categories. This may have some hypothetical utility, but it has existed for 14 years and nobody is using it, so it can probably be deleted without causing any trouble. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Lang-hin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not used; misapplies ISO 639-3 language tag hin to Hindustani language (which does not have an ISO 639 language tag). Trappist the monk (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Cambrian nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above templates are all unused and have been replaced with Template:geological category see also for navigation. See also recently closed related TfD. Gonnym (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Taiwan 2018 Referendum Results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 2018 Taiwanese referendum uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 10:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fnote4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (and really unnecessary) templates that link to a project page. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Palmer United Party/meta/shading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Australian shading template. Gonnym (talk) 09:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:USTimeZoneTemplates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TfD accompanies Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 14#Category:Time Zone Intrastate Broadcast templates. This template is a flat list with 9 of the 10 categories for deletion in the linked discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User bureaucrat since/Exp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Orphaned subtemplate. This function is performed in the parent template natively. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Category cancer survivors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. Also, it is not clear to me that this template could be applied to any categories. I see "deaths" but do not see "survivor" categories in Category:Cancer. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User Ukulele-2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. Content is just a single word. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User USM Alger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Content is just a single wikilink. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be used, superseded by other. Q28 (talk) 06:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User Info Card 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. Created in 2017, with only maintenance edits by gnomes since then. A maintenance burden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Administrator review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 10:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used since 2017. Q28 (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Editor review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep.

(non-admin closure) Q28 (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Not used since 2017. Q28 (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User Chandigarh Wikipedians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This page may have been intended for use at Category:Chandigarhi Wikipedians or a related page, but those category pages have gotten along fine without this malformed mix of stuff since its creation in 2013. Not that despite its name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User CurrentSwedishMilitaryRanks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Content already exists in a slightly different form at Military ranks of the Swedish Armed Forces and Swedish Army, so these templates do not appear to be usable. Note that despite their names, these are not userboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User English pronunciation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Only edits were three edits to create it in 2013. Despite the name, it is not a userbox. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Guardian Footballers Best In The World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Duplicate of {{Guardian Best Male Footballers In The World}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as duplicate. Not convinced we need the original template, but we definitely don't need an unused duplicate of it. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - both versions created by same user, so I suspect this was their ignorant attempt at a 'move'. The duplicate is certainly not needed, and I don't think the original is either. Would be happy for both to be deleted to be honest. Thoughts @Jonesey95 and Joseph2302:? GiantSnowman 22:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe I misunderstand the question, but {{Guardian Best Male Footballers In The World}} (note "Male" in the name) is transcluded in five articles, so if you want to delete it, you'd have to come up with a valid rationale. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Falls under Fancruft. This is navbox for a website ranking not an actual reward in the world of Football/Soccer. I've nominated the template it duplicates per the Fancruft rational for December 15. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Red link only

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:RANJFS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links, no wikicode. Template had just one transclusion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 24, where I have substed it. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Short description/long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This functionality appears to be directly implemented in {{Short description}}, so we probably do not need this dedicated subtemplate. Template created by now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/class

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/Archive_47#Proposal_#2, WikiProject Non-tropical storms is now Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Non-tropical storms task force. The class for Non-tropical storms is now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Non-tropical storms task force/Assessment. I think this can be deleted as the WikiProject is now a task force, but I want to be 100% sure. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect I'd say this should be redirected to the current Assessment subpage or at least history merged. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:FC Ripensia Timișoara seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is full of redlinks and is currently not used in any article. The season links at FC Ripensia Timișoara are to the league seasons, not individual seasons for FC Ripensia Timișoara. Therefore, I don't think this template is needed until enough blue links are made. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the purpose of a template is to navigate between blue links. No blue links exist, so template is pointless. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 21:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/CCF and related templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This set of Canadian political party templates appears to have been migrated to {{Canadian party colour}}, which is used in 15,000 articles. Each of these templates has between 0 and 40 leftover transclusions in User, Wikipedia, and Talk spaces. I recommend that this set of templates, which is essentially defunct, be substed, or replaced by the actual maintained template, as appropriate for each transclusion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete. Though now that we have a centralized module, I would like to see {{Canadian party colour}} itself use it instead of holding its own data. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
substitute and delete any uses in talk pages, user pages, etc. all the article-space uses have already been replaced. Frietjes (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:KS lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced as part of the migration to {{Adjacent stations}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_14&oldid=1061507067"