Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment rewrite

We elected to use the

the main description

.

This page is to be used for the revised drafting of the assessment criteria. The main summary page will be drafted here, and we will have other detailed pages linked from here.

Assessment guidelines

WikiProject-based assessment levels are shown first. These ratings are given by individual WikiProjects to articles under their scope.

**WikiProject article progress grading scheme** [
v
t
e
]
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
A {{A-Class}}	An article that is well organized and is essentially complete, having gone through some internal review by the WikiProject, but which may need style issues addressed before submission as a featured article candidate .	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge is needed to "tweak" the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.	Durian (as of March 2007)
B {{B-Class}}	Mostly complete, without B-Class criteria .	A typical reader should learn something.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is usually needed here.	Jammu and Kashmir (Oct. 2007) is useful but needs more content and references.
C {{C-Class}}	Moderately complete, and may lack sources or contain cleanup tags.	Useful to a casual reader, but a serious reader would need more.	Considerable editing is still needed, to fill gaps in content or address cleanup issues.	Exeter Cathedral (July 2008) covers the basics well but needs more. Weak on refs., style issues.
Start {{Start-Class}}	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and lacks reliable sources.	Useful to some, provides more than a little information, but many readers will need more.	Much editing and content is needed, not a complete article.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	A very basic description of the topic.	Possibly useful. It might be just a dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

This table shows assessments of an article by the general Wikipedia community. These are given to articles that pass Wikipedia-wide processes.

**Community-based article progress assessments** [
v
t
e
]
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Article has " these standards .	Outstanding, thorough article.	Updates and minor copyedits.	Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL {{FL-Class}}	Article has "Featured lists" status, and meets these criteria.	Outstanding, thorough list.	Updates and minor copyedits.	FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
GA {{GA-Class}}	Article has good article standards .	Useful to nearly all readers, no obvious problems, but other encyclopedias may do a better job.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful.	International Space Station (as of February 2007)

There are a few other assessments used in the mainspace that are done by WikiProjects but do not fit into the scale. Some of these are not used by all WikiProjects. Of these, only List-Class is tracked by the bot. In no particular order:

**Other WikiProject assessments** [
v
t
e
]
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
List {{List-Class}}	An article that meets the definition of a wikilinks , with descriptions.	There is no one way to make a list, but it should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists can be anything from a stub to a Featured List.	List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)
Disambig {{Disambig-Class}}	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created.	Aa River (as of June 2008)
Needed {{Needed-Class}}	An article page that should exist, but does not.	The page does not exist or is a redirect.	An appropriate article should be created on the subject.	Lake effect (as of April 2007)
NA {{NA-Class}}	Any non-article page that does not fit into any other category.	The page does not have article content.	May or may not apply, depending on the type of page.	Square knot (as of November 2006)

Assessment description

This table provides more detailed descriptions for the main assessment levels.

**Article progress grading scheme** [
v
t
e
]
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received " current criteria for featured articles .	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.	Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL {{FL-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.	FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of March 2007)
GA {{GA-Class}}	The article has passed through the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B {{B-Class}}	Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. The article contains most of the material about the topic, and may be regarded as a complete article. It is broad in its coverage, while staying focused on the topic. This article has engaging, well-presented prose, although it may have a few gaps in style, citations, and clarity. The article should meet the Good article criteria should fall in this category.	Useful to the majority of casual readers, and provides detailed, clear and accessible prose, with a minimum of jargon. Gives a nice explanation to most readers, but technical content may be inadequate for serious students or researchers trying to use the material for derivative purposes.	Some editing is still needed, including filling small gaps or correcting small policy and style errors. May be improved by input from experts to assess where coverage is still missing, and also by illustrations, historical background and further references. Articles in this category may benefit from external review from the Good article nomination process.	Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
C {{C-Class}}	Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, No Original Research (NOR) .	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Exeter Cathedral (as of July 2008) covers the basics well but needs more content. Problems with lack of refs., style issues.
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

Combined table

This table combines the short examples with more substantial criteria explanations. It transcludes the FA, FL and GA criteria straight from their respective pages, to match the B-Class criteria we've just created (which are great, BTW Titoxd!). I've redefined the fourth column as "editing guidelines", which I think is more useful: we don't want to be focusing on what editors 'see', but rather where editors should be going. Just some ideas. Happy‑melon 15:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example

FA
{{FA-Class}}

Article has obtained "Featured article" status.

More detailed criteria

The article must meet the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

It is:
1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.

Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.

No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.

Tourette Syndrome
(as of July 2007)

FL
{{FL-Class}}

Article has "Featured lists" status.

More detailed criteria

The article must meet the featured list criteria:

Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
Lead. It has an engaging
lead
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
Comprehensiveness.
- (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
- (b) statements are
  four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
  .
- (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for
  content-forking guideline
  , does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
- (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting,
  colour
  ; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked.
- (b) Media files. It has
  are labeled accordingly
  .
- (c) Accessibility. It
  alternative (alt) text
  .
Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing
edit wars
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.

FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives
(as of January 2008)

A
{{A-Class}}

The article is well organized and is essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere, as described here
.

More detailed criteria

A	Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).

Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.

Expert knowledge may be needed to "tweak" the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.

Durian
(as of March 2007)

GA
{{GA-Class}}

Article has obtained Good article status.

More detailed criteria

The article must meet the good article criteria:

A good article is:

Well-written:
1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
2. it complies with the
  list incorporation
  .
Verifiable with no original research:
1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
  the layout style guideline
  ;
2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
3. it contains no original research; and
4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage:
1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
audio
:
1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
2. media are
  relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
  .

Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.

Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.

International Space Station
(as of February 2007)

B
{{B-Class}}

The article is mostly complete, without major issues, but requires some further work to reach

six B-Class criteria

:

More detailed criteria

The article is
suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web
}} is optional.

The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an

A-Class article

, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.

The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
The article presents its content in an
technical terms should be explained or avoided
where possible.

No reader should be left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.

A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the

manual of style

.

Jammu and Kashmir
(as of October 2007)

C
{{C-Class}}

The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.

More detailed criteria
The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than "Start"-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as in-universe perspective .

Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.

Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.

Exeter Cathedral
(July 2008)

Start
{{Start-Class}}

An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.

More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content, but it is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and speedily deleted .

Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.

Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.

Real analysis
(as of November 2006)

Stub
{{Stub-Class}}

A very basic description of the topic.

More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.

Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition

Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.

Coffee table book
(as of July 2005)

Evolution of an article - an example

This example of the article "Atom" may help demonstrate the typical profile for an article's development through the levels. Click on the numbers to see the version at that time.

The article started as a stub [[1]] on Oct 1, 2001.
By 8 October, 2001 it received some additions and approached the upper bound of the definition of stub: [[2]]
On 20 September 2002, the article was enriched with some more information and it moves into start class: [[3]]
The version as of 3 June 2004 [[4]] is still in start class. There is a meaningful amount of information - but it needs further structuring improvement.
On 24 June 2004, the article receives another important addition - a useful image. It has reached the upper bound of start class, but still not good enough to get a C-class rating: [[5]].
On 18 September 2004, the article looks like this: [[6]]. Some of the sections have expanded and now it barely meets the C-class requirements.
By 31 August 2005 the article has been expanded further and can now be comfortably called a C-class article: [[7]]. The article's major shortcoming is in referencing.
The version of 12 December 2005 [[8]] has enough content and structure of a respectable article. In spite of its lack of in-line citation, the article is approaching the upper limit of C-Class. If it were properly referenced, we could have considered rating it B-class.
After addition of several new images and contents from a book (now cited), the article looks like this [[9]] on 19 August 2006. Though some editors would still hesitate to rate it B-Class, due to its lack of in-line citation; content wise it deserves a B-Class.
By 23 March 2007 [[10]] new contents and references have been added and the article would now safely pass a B-class assessment by any editor.
The October 17 2007 version of the article: [[11]] is nominated for a Peer Review. Review closes on February 9, 2007 leaving the article like this: [[12]]. The review ensures completeness of the content, addresses many MoS issues and inline citation problems and upgrades the article to A-class.
Next day [[13]] the article is nominated and listed as GA.
On February 12, 2008 the article was nominated for FA and this version of the article: [[14]] (as of 17 February 2008) was promoted.