Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-03-05/Discussion report

Four paragraph lead, indefinitely blocked IPs, editor reviews broken?

• Date format
• "Conspiracy Theory": a contentious label?
• Resolving article title policy conflicts between MOS:TM, MOS:CT, WP:TITLETM, WP:RS, and WP:COMMONNAME
• A condition for "deliberate" branding of trademarks
• Guideline for consecutive initials
• Capitalization of Chinese dynasty names
• Placement of "Template:citation needed"
• Four paragraph lead

• Indefinitely blocked IP addresses
• Implementing AfC reviewer permissions
• Use of the Draft namespace
• Promoting the links section of Wikipedia:Signatures to policy

• Mark Wikipedia:Editor review as historical?
• Improving the "Today's featured article requests" system

• Renaming and moving of "Template:Palestinian National Authority and the Palestinian people"
• Templates rendered on redirect pages
• Should numerical value uncertainties be forced to be monospace?
• British constituent countries in "Template:Europe topic"
• Wording of "Template:Unreliable sources"
• Should airport codes be in bold by default?
• Should mathematical equations be centered?
• Improvement of "Template:Rational"

• Restricting "A class" assessment use
• Creating a "New Drafts Feed" system
• Improving Today's featured article/requests

(This section includes active RfAs, RfBs, CU/OS appointment requests, and Arbcom elections.)

• None at time of this writing

• Round 2 of the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year voting
• Continue to require adding "Template:pufc" to image captions as part of the WP:PUF process.
• Preventing vandalism with the article feedback tool

← Previous "Discussion report"

Next "Discussion report" →

In this issue

5 March 2014 (all comments)

Traffic report

Discussion report

News and notes

Featured content

WikiProject report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

• Comment Yay, I am the first one to comment, let's celebrate. *celebrating* *pop* --Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|
  (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment I think you forgot the "Previous Discussion report" link at the bottom right above this comment section. I contributed to some of these discussions through this article, so thank you for gathering them all up like this :D --Nicereddy (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. dear barek I want you to recatgorize rubber band guns article because rubber band guns are not nessarly harassment devices take for example a concenual safe , sportsmanlike conducted game which is not harassment, it's only harassment when in bad faith. Postmahomeson (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Conspiracy Theory was withdrawn on the 4th. Does it count as active by the 5th then? Zell Faze (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]