Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-10-01/Discussion report
Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
Stop the presses... The interface admin proposal has at long last been closed. The process for admins requesting the right will be as follows:
- Venue: WP:BN
- Process: Admin makes a request, with a rationale, at the correct venue, to request access to the permission. The request will remain open for 48 hours for first-time requests. Re-admin requests, not under a cloud, will not have a waiting period. No notice at other noticeboards is required. Bureaucrats may inquire about why admins are requesting access at their discretion. Users may discuss the applicant, but the final decision rests with the reviewing bureaucrat.
- Duration of right: Permanent by default, can be temporary if requested.
The closer,
The originally published article is below:
Interface Admin policy proposal heads to a vote... I mean !vote
Discussion on proposed policies for
interface-admin
user right. There are currently 9 intadminsThe main
- Process for requesting
Administrators who wish to request this permission may make a new request at
- Please describe any relevant on-wiki experience you have for this role.
- Please outline, without breaching your personal privacy, any off-wiki experience or technical expertise you may have for this role.
Requests will be open for one week, during which any editor may comment on the request. Editors are encouraged to comment on the requester's level of trust and technical ability. An uninvolved
- Removal of permissions
Permission should be removed by bureaucrats in the following circumstances:
- Interface administrators who have made no edits or logged actions for at least 12 months.
- Voluntary request by the interface administrator at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
- After misuse of the access, by consensus at the administrators' noticeboard.
- Upon removal of administrator access, for any reason.
- By request of the Arbitration Committee.
The main RfC currently has 37 supports and 29 opposes. A few supporters expressed a "
While discussions continue, a de-facto "RfTA" process has popped up on the busy talk page, where candidates who pass get the permission for 60 days. Since the last article, several more intadmins have now been given the tools by community consensus, adding Oshwah, Cyberpower678, Deryck Chan, and former Signpost editor-in-chief Ragesoss to the group, which previously consisted of TheDJ, MusikAnimal, MSGJ, Xaosflux, Mr. Stradivarius, and Amorymeltzer.
Another (less critical) discussion going on at the page is what the intadmin logo should be. The most popular suggestion is
Should highlighted signatures be banned?
A discussion at
Other discussions this month
- On WP:NOT. 20 supports and 7 opposes as of September 29.
- On semi-officially listed alongside such sources as The Daily Mail.
- On Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations): Should Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations) be made a guideline?
- On 90 days/500 edits) from being able to index their userpages in search results. The purpose of this would be to prevent spam. The proposal was made in response to a log-only edit filter (Special:AbuseFilter/930) being created.
- On the talk page for the infobox manual of style: Should genres be removed from music infoboxes?
Discuss this story