Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-07-31/Arbitration report
Arbitration report
A month of reintegration
After the
wheel warring
may be grounds for removal of administrative rights by the committee".
The second case accepted, titled "Antisemitism in Poland", concerns articles like History of the Jews in Poland, but arbitrator AGK said in the opening phase "even we are not sure yet what the dispute entails" other than a clear clash between (primarily) two editors. The workshop phase closed 30 June, and the committee is now deliberating offline on a decision. As of writing deadline, there have been no principles, findings of fact, nor remedies for the case posted.
Cases
- Declined: Fram - Special:Permalink/904188718#Fram
- Declined: Disputed Signpost article – Disputed Signpost article
- Closed: Rama - Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama
- Accepted: Antisemitism in Poland - Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland
- Closed: Canadian politics - Special:diff/905003210
- Accepted: Reversion of office actions - Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversion of office actions
People
- SQL appointed trainee clerk
- Changes to Oversight team (-GB fan)
- Resignation of CU and OS by Beeblebrox, BU Rob13, and DoRD
Motions
- Level 1 desysop of Nv8200pa
- Desysopping of Od Mishehu
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Motion: Discretionary Sanctions: Awareness and alerts (per request for clarification and amendment)
Requests for clarification and amendment
- Declined
- Special:Permalink/906519058#Amendment request: Crouch, Swale restrictions appeal
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control#Clarification request: Gun control (June 2019)
- Accepted
- Open
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 3
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: The Rambling Man
Other
- Open letter to the WMF Board
- Related update - Update from the Arbitration Committee
Discuss this story
MFDdeletion proposal was initiated and SNOW defeated. In another area, I called this an implicit embrace of The Signpost's function as a legitimate journalistic/investigatory/opinion outlet, by the community. Many of these functions were explicitly challenged by individuals commenting at the request for an Arbcom case. Bri.public (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]This may be a dumb question, but how do I read the actual Canadian Politics case? The link provided above is to a text-only diff. I can see a link in the diff, but it is not something one can navigate to. So, how do I get there? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]