Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative Views/Articles

Alternative Views Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

It seems to me utterly useless. __

Delete - This seems to be an older subpage included from earlier work on Alternative Views. I included it in the tabbed navigation since it was one of the existing subpages. Clifflandis (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if we can PROD it or if we must MfD it? __

talk) 18:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Please leave it, it looks useful to me. Why would we get rid of this when the participants page says " To see recent changes to the articles already related to this project please use the recent changes function"?

talk) 19:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Bwahahaha, I just checked out your talk page...nevermind, you know all this stuff already! Oh well, maybe it'll help someone else who's interested in the status of this page. Clifflandis (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArticleAlertbot is not just down, it's dead. [1].

talk) 14:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I've closed the MFD discussion as keep. However, it will be under the discretion of the Wikiproject to clean it up if possible. bibliomaniac15 04:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be converted to a list of Userify Articles. Since many subjects of alternative views will require undergoing a major consensus process and heavy scrutiny before being truly accepted by Wikipedia in live articles, it should make sense that we start a Userify taskforce, and convert this section to their dumping ground of work.

I propose that they split it up into nominated main articles for Userified drafts, a hard list of running drafts, peer-review requests, and featured (too show off our hard work). Eaterjolly (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which alternative views concerning black people make the page a good one to include within the scope of WikiProject Alternative Views? AndrewOne (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]