Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Graphic design

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Graphic design page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 91 days

Graphic design Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Color code#Requested move 16 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 22:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am one of a group of practitioners, educators, and librarians who want to start working on graphic design related content in Wikipedia. We are trying to locate who is active in this Wikiproject, as we think we will have a fair amount of energy to bring to the topic. Please feel free to ping me and let me know with whom I might communicate. Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following up here. Wondering if any of the early members of the group are still editing? @Oicumayberight, @Steveluscher, @Hitrish, @Chelt -- wondering if any of you are still following this project? Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 18:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I realise this was posted over a year ago, but am also keen to increase the coverage of graphic design (studios, disciplines, practitioners, publications and critics). I have a draft in submission currently and looking to see how it might be improved. Thanks! Looktowindward (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to

. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on

and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

-

}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At

]