Asclepius (treatise)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Asclepius, also known as the Perfect Discourse (from the Greek Logos teleios),[a] is a religio-philosophical Hermetic treatise. The original Greek text, which was likely written in Alexandria between 100 CE and 300 CE,[1] is largely lost and only a few fragments remain. However, the full text is extant in an early Latin translation, and fragments from a Coptic translation have also been found among the documents discovered in Nag Hammadi.[2]

Contents

The text takes the form of a dialogue, set in the sanctuary of an Egyptian temple, between Hermes Trismegistus and three of his students: Asclepius (a grandson of the Greek god and physician Asclepius), Tat, and Hammon.[3]

Legacy

Medieval Latin readers had access to many Hermetic treatises of a 'technical' nature (

Middle Platonist philosopher Apuleius (c. 124–after 170).[6]

The text of the Asclepius was used by the philosopher Peter Abelard (1079–1142) and his student Robert of Melun (c. 1100–1167) as a means to prove that knowledge of the Trinity was naturally available to pagans.[7] Albertus Magnus (c. 1200–1280) praised the idea developed in the Asclepius that the human being forms a link between God and the world, uniting in themselves both the spiritual nature of divine beings and the corporeal nature of the material world.[8]

References

Notes

  1. ^ Alternative translations of the Greek title include the Perfect Word and the Perfect Teaching, in Latin Sermo perfectus.

Citations

  1. ^ Salaman 2007, p. 11.
  2. ^ Robinson 1990, pp. 12–13; Copenhaver 1992, pp. xliii–xliv. Critical editions of the Latin text in Nock & Festugière 1945–1954 and Stefani 2019; English translations of the Latin in Copenhaver 1992 and Salaman 2007; English translation of the Coptic fragments in Brashler, Dirkse & Parrott 1990.
  3. ^ Hanegraaff 2022, p. 49.
  4. ^ See, e.g., Burnett 2004; Matton 2004. On the Arabic Hermetica, see Van Bladel 2009.
  5. ^ Copenhaver 1992, p. xlvii.
  6. ^ Ebeling 2007, p. 54; Copenhaver 1992, p. 214.
  7. ^ Ebeling 2007, p. 54.
  8. ^ Ebeling 2007, p. 55.

Bibliography

Translations and editions

Secondary literature