Battle of Deorham

Coordinates: 51°29′20.76″N 2°22′25.34″W / 51.4891000°N 2.3737056°W / 51.4891000; -2.3737056
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Battle of Deorham
Part of the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain

Earthworks around Hinton Hill,
just north of Dyrham, Gloucestershire
Date577
Location
Result Saxon victory, permanently dividing Wales from the Celtic south-west of England
Belligerents
West Saxons Britons
Commanders and leaders
Conmail 
Condidan 
Farinmail 

The Battle of Deorham (or Dyrham) is portrayed by the

).

Evidence

Sixth- and seventh-century battles of West-Saxon kings according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

The only evidence for the battle is an entry in the

Parker Chronicle
, the annal reads:

577: Her Cuþwine ⁊ Ceawlin fuhton wiþ Brettas, ⁊ hie .iii. kyningas ofslogon, Coinmail, ⁊ Condidan, ⁊ Farinmail, in þære stowe þe is gecueden Deorham. ⁊ genamon .iii. ceastro Gleawanceaster, ⁊ Cirenceaster, ⁊ Baþanceaster.[2]


577: Here Cuthwine and Ceawlin fought against the Britons, and they killed 3 kings, Coinmail, Condidan and Farinmail, in the place which is called Deorham, and took 3 cities: Gloucester and Cirencester and Bath[3]

Scholars agree that the place-name Deorham here survives in the name of

Corinium, a provincial capital in the Roman period (Cirencester); Glevum, a former colonia (Gloucester); and Aquae Sulis, a renowned spa and pagan religious centre (Bath).[1]
: 33–34 

Historiography

Nineteenth-century narrative of Anglo-Saxon settlement

In an influential lecture of 1849 on "The Early English Settlements in South Britain",

Twentieth-century military-history speculation

The belief that the Chronicle account was substantially reliable—notwithstanding its obvious brevity—encouraged elaborate speculation by antiquarians such as

Wansdyke in a doomed attempt to prevent more territory from being lost.[7]

The military historian Lieutenant-Colonel

Forest of Braden, with Hinton Hill Camp behind them as their stores depot. Burne speculated that if the Saxon attack drove the Britons back from their first line onto the second ridge near the edge of the escarpment, the slightest further retreat would leave their flanks open to a downhill pursuit. He imagined that this is what occurred, with the three Briton leaders and their main body being driven back into the fort while the flanking Saxons driving forwards swept round behind the promontory on which the fort stands. A last stand in this position would explain why none of the three Briton leaders was able to escape. Burne went so far as to speculate that the battle was the starting point for Welsh and Cornish becoming two separate languages.[8]

Re-evaluation

By the early 1980s, a new wave of source-criticism was underway regarding the fifth-to-seventh centuries in Britain, and the Battle of Deorham was prominently tackled by Patrick Sims-Williams.[1] He noted that the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle shows no signs of being a contemporary record for the sixth century and many signs of being a later fabrication based on oral tradition and folk-etymologies of place-names, and that its material for the sixth century may reflect later West-Saxon attempts to legitimise their politics in the seventh, eighth, and/or ninth centuries by circulating stories of an imaginary past.[1]: 26–41  Showing how the Chronicle's 571 Battle of Bedcanford would have functioned to provide a West-Saxon right of conquest to much of the Chiltern Hills and the vale to their north-west following Mercia's conquest of that area in the eighth century, he noted that the Battle of Deorham too might have been used by West Saxons to counter Mercian claims in the Severn Valley.[1]: 33  But he thought more likely the possibility that the annal was based on a Welsh triad, itself unlikely to be historically accurate, arising from a similar tradition to medieval Welsh literature which places an English-battling seventh-century king called Cynddylan in the Wroxeter region.[1]: 33–34 

Scholars also argued that the importance given the towns more likely reflects ninth and tenth-century polities, of the time the Chronicle was given its present form, than the de-urbanised sixth century.[9][10]

In popular culture

References

  1. ^
    JSTOR 44510771
    ..
  2. ^ "Manuscript A: The Parker Chronicle", in The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: An Electronic Edition, ed. by Tony Jebson.
  3. ^ Swanton, M. (1996). The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles. London: Phoenix. p. 18.
  4. .
  5. ^ H. P. R. Finberg, The Formation of England, 550–1042 (London: Hart-Davis, MacGibbon, 1974), pp. 22–23.
  6. .
  7. ^ The Modern Antiquarian
  8. ^ Alfred H. Burne, More Battlefields of England (London: Methuen, 1952).
  9. ^ Wacher, John (1995). The Towns of Roman Britain. London: Batsford..
  10. ^ Simon T. Loseby, "Power and towns in Late Roman Britain and early Anglo-Saxon England" in Gisela Ripoll and Josep M. Gurt, eds., Sedes regiae (ann. 400–800), (Barcelona, 2000), esp. pp 329f (on-line text).

External links

51°29′20.76″N 2°22′25.34″W / 51.4891000°N 2.3737056°W / 51.4891000; -2.3737056