Borel functional calculus

In

−Δ or the exponential ${\displaystyle e^{it\Delta }.}$

The 'scope' here means the kind of function of an operator which is allowed. The Borel functional calculus is more general than the continuous functional calculus, and its focus is different than the holomorphic functional calculus.

More precisely, the Borel functional calculus allows for applying an arbitrary

.

Motivation

If T is a self-adjoint operator on a finite-dimensional

of T, that is

Thus, for any positive integer n,

If only polynomials in T are considered, then one gets the

h, one can define an operator h(T) by specifying its behavior on the basis:

Generally, any self-adjoint operator T is unitarily equivalent to a multiplication operator; this means that for many purposes, T can be considered as an operator

acting on L² of some measure space. The domain of T consists of those functions whose above expression is in L². In such a case, one can define analogously

For many technical purposes, the previous formulation is good enough. However, it is desirable to formulate the functional calculus in a way that does not depend on the particular representation of T as a multiplication operator. That's what we do in the next section.

The bounded functional calculus

Formally, the bounded Borel functional calculus of a self adjoint operator T on Hilbert space H is a mapping defined on the space of bounded complex-valued Borel functions f on the real line,

such that the following conditions hold

• π_T is an involution-preserving and unit-preserving homomorphism from the ring of complex-valued bounded measurable functions on R.
• If ξ is an element of H, then
  $${\displaystyle \nu _{\xi }:E\mapsto \langle \pi _{T}(\mathbf {1} _{E})\xi ,\xi \rangle }$$

  
  is a
  countably additive measure on the Borel sets E of R. In the above formula 1_E denotes the indicator function
  of E. These measures ν_ξ are called the spectral measures of T.
• If η denotes the mapping z → z on C, then:
  $${\displaystyle \pi _{T}\left([\eta +i]^{-1}\right)=[T+i]^{-1}.}$$

  

Theorem —  Any self-adjoint operator T has a unique Borel functional calculus.

This defines the functional calculus for bounded functions applied to possibly unbounded self-adjoint operators. Using the bounded functional calculus, one can prove part of the Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups:

As an application, we consider the

of a quantum mechanical system S. The unitary group generated by iH corresponds to the time evolution of S.

We can also use the Borel functional calculus to abstractly solve some linear initial value problems such as the heat equation, or Maxwell's equations.

Existence of a functional calculus

The existence of a mapping with the properties of a functional calculus requires proof. For the case of a bounded self-adjoint operator T, the existence of a Borel functional calculus can be shown in an elementary way as follows:

First pass from polynomial to continuous functional calculus by using the Stone–Weierstrass theorem. The crucial fact here is that, for a bounded self adjoint operator T and a polynomial p,

Consequently, the mapping

is an isometry and a densely defined homomorphism on the ring of polynomial functions. Extending by continuity defines f(T) for a continuous function f on the spectrum of T. The , and this is the Borel functional calculus.

Alternatively, the continuous calculus can be obtained via the

.

Given an operator T, the range of the continuous functional calculus h → h(T) is the (abelian) C*-algebra C(T) generated by T. The Borel functional calculus has a larger range, that is the closure of C(T) in the weak operator topology, a (still abelian) von Neumann algebra.

The general functional calculus

We can also define the functional calculus for not necessarily bounded Borel functions h; the result is an operator which in general fails to be bounded. Using the multiplication by a function f model of a self-adjoint operator given by the spectral theorem, this is multiplication by the composition of h with f.

The operator S of the previous theorem is denoted h(T).

More generally, a Borel functional calculus also exists for (bounded) normal operators.

Resolution of the identity

Let ${\displaystyle T}$ be a self-adjoint operator. If ${\displaystyle E}$ is a Borel subset of R, and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{E}}$ is the indicator function of E, then ${\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{E}(T)}$ is a self-adjoint projection on H. Then mapping

is a projection-valued measure. The measure of R with respect to ${\textstyle \Omega _{T}}$ is the identity operator on H. In other words, the identity operator can be expressed as the spectral integral

${\displaystyle I=\Omega _{T}([-\infty ,\infty ])=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }d\Omega _{T}}$.

Stone's formula^[3] expresses the spectral measure ${\displaystyle \Omega _{T}}$ in terms of the resolvent ${\displaystyle R_{T}(\lambda )\equiv \left(T-\lambda I\right)^{-1}}$:

${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2\pi i}}\lim _{\epsilon \to 0^{+}}\int _{a}^{b}\left[R_{T}(\lambda +i\epsilon ))-R_{T}(\lambda -i\epsilon )\right]\,d\lambda =\Omega _{T}((a,b))+{\frac {1}{2}}\left[\Omega _{T}(\{a\})+\Omega _{T}(\{b\})\right].}$

Depending on the source, the resolution of the identity is defined, either as a projection-valued measure ${\displaystyle \Omega _{T}}$,^[4] or as a one-parameter family of projection-valued measures ${\displaystyle \{\Sigma _{\lambda }\}}$ with ${\displaystyle -\infty <\lambda <\infty }$.^[5]

In the case of a discrete measure (in particular, when H is finite-dimensional), ${\textstyle I=\int 1\,d\Omega _{T}}$ can be written as

in the Dirac notation, where each ${\displaystyle |i\rangle }$ is a normalized eigenvector of T. The set ${\displaystyle \{|i\rangle \}}$ is an orthonormal basis of H.

In physics literature, using the above as heuristic, one passes to the case when the spectral measure is no longer discrete and write the resolution of identity as

and speak of a "continuous basis", or "continuum of basis states", ${\displaystyle \{|i\rangle \}}$ Mathematically, unless rigorous justifications are given, this expression is purely formal.

References