Central Organising Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist)
Central Organising Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) | |
---|---|
Marxism-Leninism | |
Publication | Liberation |
Central Organising Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) (abbreviated COC, CPI(ML)) was a communist party in India, one of the main splinter factions of the original Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist). COC, CPI(ML) occupied a middle position between the pro-Charu Majumdar group led by Mahadev Mukherjee and the anti-Majumdar group led by Satyanarayan Singh. Failing to articulate a common ideological position, COC, CPI(ML) soon suffered internal divisions and splits. Two of the splinter groups of COC, CPI(ML) in Andhra Pradesh are predecessors of the present-day Communist Party of India (Maoist).
Split between Mukherjee and Sharma, emergence of COC, CPI(ML)
The emergence of COC, CPI(ML) began in 1973 as the erstwhile secretary of the Punjab branch and
In Andhra Pradesh
The strongest group that had joined COC, CPI(ML) was the Andhra committee under the leadership of Kondapalli Seetharamaiah.[3] As of 1974 the Andhra committee was based in Nagpur.[5] The Andhra committee had five active armed squads and a number of district-level party committees.[3] The squads continued to carry out annihilation actions.[6]
Whilst the squads of the original CPI(ML) had been virtually dismantled by January 1974, COC, CPI(ML) reorganised squad actions 1974–1976.[6] COC, CPI(ML) squad activities were largely limited to Telangana.[6] In Medak district a squad led by Kotagiri Venkati was particularly active, conducting nearly 30 robberies in 1974 and a similar number in 1975.[6] The squad disintegrated after the killing of Venkati on June 25, 1976, in Mupparam, Warangal district.[6]
In some parts of Andhra Pradesh COC, CPI(ML) mobilised agitations against landlords and moneylenders.
COC, CPI(ML) managed to obtain support from intellectuals, writers and poets, organised in the Revolutionary Writers Association (RWA).[6] Sri Sri served as the RWA president.[6] RWA members toured Andhra Pradesh and organised mass meetings, accompanied by musical teams from Jana Natya Mandali.[6]
Other states
Another group that joined COC, CPI(ML) was the Mass Line group in Kerala.[7] In Kashmir the group of R.P. Saraf agreed to join COC, CPI(ML) but rejected the notion of a centralised party at this stage. Rather Saraf demanded that COC, CPI(ML) would solely function as a coordination body for the time being.[3] Likewise the Uttar Pradesh committee asked that COC, CPI(ML) should be open to all Maoists.[3] Thus COC, CPI(ML) did not agree with the suggestions from Saraf and the UP committee, and these two groups opted not to join the party.[3]
Failed attempt at united front
In 1975, in response to
'Road to Revolution' and splits in COC, CPI(ML)
COC, CPI(ML) suffered a protracted organisational crisis from the onset of the founding of the party.[1][4] It failed to re-unite the communist revolutionary movement and formulate a common ideological line for the party.[1][4] Rather, there were three separate documents issued by different groups, one by Sharma, one by Ghosh and one produced by the Andhra committee of the party.[4] COC, CPI(ML) lacked a unifying theoretical analysis. Rather the members of the party leadership were united by rejection of the two other main lines of the Naxal movement at the time, i.e. those of Mahadev Mukherjee and Satyanarayan Singh. COC, CPI(ML) disagreed with continuation of Majumdar's line without any modifications (i.e. Mukherjee's position), but it could not digest the programme of Singh calling for economic struggles, mass organisations, united fronts, forest base areas and an outright rejection of the annihilation line.[3]
In October 1975 the three documents were withdrawn and 'Road to Revolution' was adopted as a compromise measure.[4][2] 'Road to Revolution' argued that the principal contradiction in Indian context stood between feudalism and the broad masses of the people.[1] It argued in favour of armed struggle, but stated that mass organisation struggles were also valid and that methods of struggle would be determined from local dynamics.[1]
The 'Road to Revolution' failed to resolve the political crisis in COC, CPI(ML).
Appeal for release of prisoners
After the
Further disintegration
In 1977 a faction led by Ram Nath, gathering the majorities in the Delhi, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh committees of COC, CPI(ML), broke away and formed the
Suniti Ghosh broke away from COC, CPI(ML) and continued to run a small faction also named COC, CPI(ML).The secretary of the Punjab committee of COC, CPI(ML), Sham Chopra, broke away and joined the T. Nagi Reddy group.[1] In 1979 what remained of Sharma's COC, CPI(ML) suffered yet another split, as some party leaders in Punjab rejected his support for Deng Xiaoping in China and the Three Worlds Theory.[4][1]
In 1982 M. Appalasuri's COC, CPI(ML) faction merged with Bhowani Roy Chowdhury's
References
- ^ ISBN 978-81-7154-527-8.
- ^ a b c d e Karat, Prakash. Naxalism Today; At an Ideological Deadend [sic]
- ^ ISBN 978-81-212-0252-7.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist). Central Reorganization Committee (1982). Towards a New Phase of Spring Thunder: Evaluation of the CPI(ML) in Its Historical Background. Central Reorganization Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist). pp. 137–138.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-317-41232-8.
- ^ ISBN 978-81-212-0252-7.
- ISBN 978-81-212-0252-7.
- ISBN 978-93-82573-44-9.
- ^ Mohanty, Manoranjan. Revolutionary Violence. A Study of the Maoist Movement in India. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1977. p. xxv–xxvi
- ISBN 9780836410969.
- ISBN 978-1-317-41232-8.
- ISBN 81-7167-294-9, p. 129.
- ISBN 978-93-81411-66-7.