Chesapeake Bay Program

The Chesapeake Bay Program is the regional partnership that directs and conducts the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay in the United States. As a partnership, the Chesapeake Bay Program brings together members of various state, federal, academic and local watershed organizations to build and adopt policies that support Chesapeake Bay restoration. By combining the resources and unique strengths of each individual organization, the Chesapeake Bay Program is able to follow a unified plan for restoration. The program office is located in Annapolis, Maryland.

History

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Congress funded scientific and estuarine research of the Chesapeake Bay, which pinpointed three areas that required immediate attention:

toxic pollution

nutrient over-enrichment
dwindling underwater bay grasses.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a report in September 1983, based on seven years of research on the bay. The report stated that the bay was an "ecosystem in decline" and cited numerous instances of declines in the populations of oysters, crabs, freshwater fish and other wildlife.^[1]^[2]

In December 1983 the

District of Columbia; and the EPA Administrator signed The Chesapeake Bay Agreement of 1983.^[3]

From this act, the Chesapeake Bay Program Executive Council was formed.

Evolution

Since the signing of 1983 agreement, the Chesapeake Bay Program has adopted two additional agreements that provide overall guidance for Chesapeake Bay restoration:

The 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement established the Chesapeake Bay Program's goal to reduce the amount of
tributaries.^[4]

In June 2000, the Chesapeake Bay Program adopted Chesapeake 2000, an agreement intended to guide restoration activities throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed through 2010.[5] Chesapeake 2000 also provided the opportunity for the adjoining states of Delaware, New York and West Virginia to become more involved in the partnership. These headwater states now work with the Chesapeake Bay Program to reduce nutrients and sediment flowing into rivers from their jurisdictions. The renewed bay agreement was designed to guide restoration activities throughout the bay watershed through 2010. The members pledged to achieve over 100 specific actions all designed to restore the health of the bay. The agreement is organized into five categories, all dedicated to restoration and protection of different areas of the bay's health: living resources, vital habitat, water quality, sound land use, and stewardship and community engagement.
- The living resource section of the agreement states the goal of "restore, enhance and protect, the
  finfish, shellfish, and other living resources, their habitats and ecological relationship to sustain all fisheries and provide for a balanced ecosystem." One of the specific goals for this is to help the blue crab population by establishing harvest targets and begin implementing state fisheries management strategies and to manage the blue crab fishery to restore a healthy, size, age structure and biomass. This section also touches on multi-species management, a tenfold increase in the native oyster
  population, as well as resident and migratory fish passage.
- The vital habitat protection and restoration section aims to recommit to the existing goal of protecting 114,000 acres (460 km²) of
  wetlands, watershed, and forest preservation and conservation easements
  .
- The water quality restoration and protection section states that the program plans on involving aid from stormwater management, upgrading wastewater treatment plants to biological nutrient removal, upgrading managing sewage systems, and developing tributary strategies for each basin. It also states that by 2010, they want to correct the nutrient-relation problems associated with the bay and remove it from the list of impaired waters under the Clean Water Act.
- The sound land use portion of the agreement talks about permanently preserving 20 percent of the watershed from development by 2010. Also, by 2002, each state will coordinate transportation policies to reduce the dependence on automobiles by encouraging travel alternatives such as biking and bus riding.
- Lastly, the stewardship section states that by 2001, they want to provide information to enhance the ability of citizen and community groups to participate in bay restoration. Also beginning in 2005, the Chesapeake Bay Program wants to provide an outdoor experience of the bay for every student before they graduate high school in order to encourage knowledge and awareness of the bay’s problems.^[6]

Budget

Since the creation of the program, Congress has provided annual appropriations, and the budgets of the Environmental Protection Agency and

Interior and Commerce. Funding has also been provided by the states of Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia; and the District of Columbia.^[7]^[8]

Partners

Signatories to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement

Chesapeake Bay Commission (legislative assembly representing Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth of Virginia
District of Columbia
State of Maryland
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Headwater State Partners

Federal Agency Partners

Chesapeake Bay Environmental Enforcement Coalition
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Capital Planning Commission
U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Farm Service Agency
- Natural Resources Conservation Service
- U.S. National Arboretum
U.S. Department of Commerce
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. Department of Education
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Department of Transportation
U.S. General Services Administration
U.S. Postal Service

More Partners

References

^ Chesapeake Bay Program: Findings and Recommendations (Report). Philadelphia, PA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). September 1983. EPA 903/R-83/008.
^ Franklin, Ben A. (1983-09-27). "Chesapeake Bay Study Citing Pollution Threats". The New York Times. p. A24.
^ Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP), Annapolis, MD (1983). "1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement."
^ CBP (1987). "1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement."
^ CBP (2000). "Chesapeake 2000."
^ Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD (2003). "Chesapeake 2000: The Renewed Bay Agreement." Archived 2004-02-18 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 2011-07-31.
^ Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut; Report to Congress (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. September 2018.
^ "Funding". Chesapeake Bay Program. Retrieved 2019-10-06.

External links

Chesapeake Bay Program - official site

[1] Chesapeake Bay Program: Findings and Recommendations (Report). Philadelphia, PA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). September 1983. EPA 903/R-83/008.

[2] Franklin, Ben A. (1983-09-27). "Chesapeake Bay Study Citing Pollution Threats". The New York Times. p. A24.

[3] Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP), Annapolis, MD (1983). "1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement."

[4] CBP (1987). "1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement."

[5] CBP (2000). "Chesapeake 2000."

[6] Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD (2003). "Chesapeake 2000: The Renewed Bay Agreement." Archived 2004-02-18 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 2011-07-31.

[7] Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut; Report to Congress (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. September 2018.

[8] "Funding". Chesapeake Bay Program. Retrieved 2019-10-06.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[6]

[7]

[8]

Authority control databases
International	ISNI 2 VIAF
National	United States