Dostoevsky and Parricide
"Dostoevsky and Parricide" (
Ernest Jones termed the piece “Freud's last contribution to the psychology of literature and his most brilliant”;[2] Freud himself however called it “this trivial essay. It was written as a favour for someone and written reluctantly”.[3]
Gambling
The second section of Freud's essay turned away from a primary consideration of The Brothers Karamazov to consider the related question of Dostoevsky's gambling. Freud saw gambling as a defiant struggle with Fate (concealing the father figure);[4] the associated guilt was the reason for the gambler's compulsion to lose. As Freud himself put it with reference to Dostoyevsky's wife:[5]
”she had noticed that the one thing which offered any real hope of salvation – his literary production – never went better than when they had lost everything....When his sense of guilt was satisfied by the punishments he had inflicted on himself, the inhibition on his work became less severe.”
See also
References
- ^ Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
- ^ Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
- ^ Quoted in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 105
- ^ Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 372
- ^ S. Freud, 'Dostoevsky and Parricide' in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 170
Further reading
- F. Dostoevsky, The Gambler (Penguin 1971)
- Joseph Frank Dostoevsky (197?) Appendix 379-91
External links
- Complete text of "Dostojewski und die Vatertötung" (in German)
- SLOBODANKA VLADIV-GLOVER - Dostoyevsky, Freud and Parricide; Deconstructive Notes on "The Brothers Karamazov" in New Zealand Slavonic Journal(1993), pp. 7-34
- Freud on Dostoevsky's Epilepsy