High-resolution audio

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Hi-Res Audio certification badge

High-resolution audio is a term for music files with

The Recording Academy Producers & Engineers Wing also cites 24-bit/96 kHz as the preferred resolution for tracking, mixing and mastering audio.[4] It is supported by media formats such as DVD-Audio, DualDisc and High Fidelity Pure Audio, download stores like Bandcamp, HDtracks and Qobuz, and streaming platforms including Apple Music, Amazon Music and Tidal. Research into high-resolution audio began in the late 1980s and recordings were made available on the consumer market in 1996.[5]

Other bit depth/sample rate combinations that are often marketed as "high-resolution" include 1-bit/2.8224 MHz (DSD), 20-bit/44.1 kHz (HDCD), 24-bit/44.1, 88.2 or 176.4 kHz, 24-bit/48, 96 or 192 kHz,[6] and 24-bit/352.8 kHz (DXD). Reference-grade digital-to-analog converters that oversample to very high rates such as 24-bit/384 kHz, 32-bit/384 kHz and 32-bit/768 kHz are also available for both consumer and professional use.[7][8] Sony's LDAC, Dolby's Digital Plus and Lenbrook's MQA are marketed as "hi-res,"[9][10][11] however, these codecs employ lossy compression and can often have lower bit rates than Compact Disc Digital Audio, and thus, cannot be classified as "true high-resolution."[12][13][14]

Definitions

Approximate dynamic range and bandwidths of some high-resolution audio formats

High-resolution audio is generally used to refer to audio files that have a higher sample rate and/or bit depth than that of Compact Disc Digital Audio (CD-DA), which operates at 44.1 kHz/16-bit.[15]

The

lossless audio capable of reproducing the full spectrum of sound from recordings which have been mastered from better than CD quality music sources which represent what the artists, producers and engineers originally intended."[16]

File formats capable of storing high-resolution audio include

History

Super Audio CD
Super Audio CD
DVD-Audio
DVD-Audio

One of the first attempts to market high-resolution audio was High Definition Compatible Digital in 1995, an encoding/decoding technique using standard CD audio.[18] This was followed by two more optical disc formats claiming sonic superiority over CD-DA: SACD in 1999, and DVD-Audio in 2000. These formats offer additional benefits such as multi-channel surround sound. Following a format war, none of these achieved widespread adoption.[19]

Following the rise in online music retailing at the start of the 21st century, high-resolution audio downloads were introduced by HDtracks starting in 2008.[19][20]

Further attempts to market high-resolution audio on optical disc followed with Pure Audio Blu-ray in 2009, and High Fidelity Pure Audio in 2013.[21] Competition in online high-resolution audio retail stepped-up in 2014 with the announcement of Neil Young's Pono service.[22]

In 2014, the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA) announced a specification and accompanying "Hi-Res AUDIO" logo for consumer audio products, administered by the Japan Audio Society (JAS). The standard sets minimums of 96 kHz sample rate and 24-bit depth, and for analog processes, 40 kHz.[23] The related "Hi-Res Audio Wireless" standard additionally requires support for the LDAC, LHDC, LC3plus and MQair codecs.[23] Sony reaffirmed its commitment towards the development in the high-resolution audio segment by offering a slew of Hi-Res Audio products.[24][failed verification]

Streaming services

As of 2021, some music streaming services such as Tidal, Qobuz, Amazon Music, and Apple Music have options to enable the playback of high-resolution audio files.[25]

Controversy

Whether there is any benefit to high-resolution audio over CD-DA is controversial, with some sources claiming sonic superiority:

...and with other opinions ranging from skeptical to highly critical:

  • "If [the music business] cared about sound quality in the first place, they would make all of the releases sound great in every format they sell: MP3, FLAC, CD, iTunes, or LP."—
    cnet[27]
  • "Impractical overkill that nobody can afford"—Gizmodo[15]
  • "A solution to a problem that doesn't exist, a business model based on willful ignorance and scamming people."—
    Xiph.org[28]

Business magazine Bloomberg Businessweek suggests that caution is in order with regard to high-resolution audio: "There is reason to be wary, given consumer electronics companies' history of pushing advancements whose main virtue is to require everyone to buy new gadgets."[29]

High-resolution files that are downloaded from niche websites that cater to audiophile listeners often include different mastering in the release – thus many comparisons of CD to these releases are evaluating differences in mastering, rather than bit depth.[30]

Most early papers using blind listening tests concluded that differences are not audible by the sample of listeners taking the test.

Blind tests have shown that musicians and composers are unable to distinguish higher resolutions from 16-bit audio at 48 kHz.[32] One 2014 paper showed that dithering using outdated methods[a] produces audible artifacts in blind listening tests.[33]

Joshua Reiss performed a meta-analysis on 20 of published tests, saying that trained listeners could distinguish between hi-resolution recordings and their CD equivalents under blind conditions. In a paper published in the July 2016 issue of the AES Journal,[34] Reiss says that, although the individual tests had mixed results, and that the effect was "small and difficult to detect," the overall result was that trained listeners could distinguish between high-resolution recordings and their CD equivalents under blind conditions: "Overall, there was a small but statistically significant ability to discriminate between standard-quality audio (44.1 or 48 kHz, 16 bit) and high-resolution audio (beyond standard quality). When subjects were trained, the ability to discriminate was far more significant." Hiroshi Nittono pointed out that the results in Reiss's paper showed that the ability to distinguish hi resolution audio from CD quality audio "was only slightly better than chance".[35]

Some technical explanations for sonic superiority cite the improved time domain impulse response of the anti-aliasing filter allowed by higher sample rates. This reduces the energy spread in time from transient signals such as plucking a string or striking a cymbal. [36][37]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Rectangular unshaped dither, rather than the industry-standard triangular or shaped dither.

References

  1. ^ "Japan Audio Society | Hi-Res Audio Logo". www.jas-audio.or.jp. Retrieved 2025-04-12.
  2. ^ "E-library page". AES. Retrieved 2025-04-12.
  3. ^ "Hi-Res Audio certification introduction". Official Support | ASUS Global. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  4. ^ "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HI-RESOLUTION MUSIC PRODUCTION". National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences. Archived from the original on 2025-04-04. Retrieved 2025-04-13.
  5. ^ .
  6. ^ "Creative Introduces New PC Audio Standard". sg.creative.com. Retrieved 2025-04-13.
  7. ISSN 0362-4331
    . Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  8. ^ "Integra Launches Three Reference-Grade Surround Offerings". Sound & Vision. 2019-09-14. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  9. ^ "MQA Labs | High resolution audio solutions -". MQALabs. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  10. ^ "Sony Corporation - LDAC™ site for end-users | Experience Your Music in Hi-Res Audio. Bringing You A Hi-Res Audio & Wireless Music Experience with LDAC". www.sony.net. Retrieved 2025-04-15.
  11. ^ "What's the Plus in Dolby® Digital Plus?" (PDF). Dolby Professional. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  12. ^ "No, Bluetooth cannot deliver hi-res audio | Darko.Audio". darko.audio. 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2025-04-15.
  13. ^ "Technology Dolby Audio Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Developer". developer.dolby.com. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  14. ^ "MQA Really Is A Fraud! – Real HD-Audio". 2021-04-15. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  15. ^ a b Aguilar, Mario (June 2013). "What Is High-Resolution Audio?". Gizmodo. Gawker Media. Retrieved 17 March 2014. High-resolution audio is a new industry marketing term
  16. ^ "High Resolution Audio Initiative Gets Major Boost with New "Hi-Res MUSIC" Logo and Branding Materials for Digital Retailers". The Recording Industry Association of America(RIAA). 2015-06-23. Retrieved 21 August 2018.
  17. ^ a b "High-resolution audio: everything you need to know". What Hi-Fi?. Haymarket Publishing. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
  18. ^ "Home Technology eMagazine - Classic Home Toys Installment #19 The Final CD Format: HDCD". HomeToys. Archived from the original on 2014-03-18. Retrieved 2012-08-05. HDCD is capable of higher quality sound reproduction because HDCD encodes the equivalent of 20 bits worth of data
  19. ^ a b "Definition of:high-resolution audio". PCMag. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 18 March 2014. HDtracks pioneered high-resolution audio via download
  20. ^ Lander, David (2014-10-21). "Norman Chesky of HDtracks and Chesky Records". Stereophile.com. Retrieved 2019-01-09.
  21. ^ "Universal Music bets on consumer longing for quality with hi-fi Pure Audio". DVD & Beyond. Globalcom Limited. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
  22. ^ O'Malley Greenburg, Zack. "How Neil Young's Pono Music Raised $2 Million in Two Days". Forbes. Retrieved 15 March 2014. He'll have some competition. Already, services like HDtracks.com have seen triple-digit growth in downloads of top-notch digital files
  23. ^ a b "Japan Audio Society - Hi-Res Audio Logo". www.jas-audio.or.jp.
  24. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2018-12-01. Retrieved 2016-12-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  25. ^ Cohen, Simon (2021-05-18). "What is hi-res audio and how can you experience it right now?". digitaltrends. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
  26. ^ "What are the benefits of SACD?". Mariinsky Label FAQ (Press release). Archived from the original on December 31, 2013. Retrieved January 1, 2014. this album is available to buy on SACD
  27. ^ Guttenberg, Steve. "What's up with Neil Young's Pono high-resolution music system?". c|net. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  28. ^ Christopher "Monty" Montgomery (25 March 2012). "24/192 Music Downloads and why they make no sense". Xiph.Org Foundation. Archived from the original on 2018-07-21. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
  29. ^ Brustein, Joshua. "Music Snobs, Neil Young Has a Product for You". BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK. BLOOMBERG L.P. Archived from the original on March 17, 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  30. ^ "Nine Inch Nails' "Hesitation Marks" - Audiophile, or AudioFAIL ?". Production Advice. 4 September 2013.
  31. ^ "Audibility of a CD-Standard A/D/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback" (PDF). J. Audio Eng. Soc. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  32. ^ Nicolas Six (21 August 2015). "We tested ... the music in high definition". Le Monde.fr.
  33. ^ Jackson, Helen M.; Capp, Michael D.; Stuart, J. Robert. "The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System". J. Audio Eng. Soc. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
  34. .
  35. .
  36. ^ Story, Mike (September 1997). "A Suggested Explanation For (Some Of) The Audible Differences Between High Sample Rate And Conventional Sample Rate Audio Material" (PDF). dCS Ltd. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 November 2009.
  37. ^ Robjohns, Hugh (August 2016). "MQA Time-domain Accuracy & Digital Audio Quality". soundonsound.com. Sound On Sound. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023.