Hodson Stone Circle
Hodson Stone Circle was a stone circle in the village of Hodson in the south-western English county of Wiltshire. The ring was part of a tradition of stone circle construction that spread throughout much of Britain, Ireland, and Brittany during the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age, over a period between 3300 and 900 BCE. The purpose of such monuments is unknown, although some archaeologists speculate that the stones represented supernatural entities for the circle's builders.
The circle was discovered and recorded by the antiquarian A. D. Passmore in the 1890s. He briefly mentioned it in an article published in The Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine, while detailing it in greater depth in his unpublished notebooks. He recorded the circle as consisting of eight stones at that time, with a possible avenue or stone row emerging from it and facing in the direction of the circle at
Context
While the transition from the
These stone circles typically show very little evidence of human visitation during the period immediately following their creation.[5] The historian Ronald Hutton noted that this suggests that they were not sites used for rituals that left archaeologically visible evidence, but may have been deliberately left as "silent and empty monuments".[6] The archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson argues that in Neolithic Britain, stone was associated with the dead, and wood with the living.[7] Other archaeologists have proposed that the stone might not represent ancestors, but rather other supernatural entities, such as deities.[6]
Various stone circles were erected in the area of modern Wiltshire, the best known of which are Avebury and Stonehenge. All of the other examples are ruined, and in some cases have been destroyed.[8] As noted by the archaeologist Aubrey Burl, these destroyed examples have left behind "only frustrating descriptions and vague positions".[8] Most of the known Wiltshire circles were erected on low-lying positions in the landscape.[8] In the area south of
Antiquarian investigation
In an 1894 article published in
In his notebook, Passmore noted that he could find eight stones as part of the circle. He also discovered three stones inside the circle, suggesting that these may have been part of an inner circle – in which case the circle would have had two concentric rings, akin to the Day House Lane circle. Alternatively, he suggested that the stones inside the circle may simply have been dumped there by farmers wanting them out of the way.[12] He also suggested that the circle was about 250 feet (76m) in diameter, and was thus of a similar size to the Day House Lane circle.[12] He identified "4 distinct lines of stone" emerging from the circle, suggesting that if this line continued all the way to Coate then it may have attached to the row of stones he also thought emerged from the Day House Lane ring.[12]
In their 2017 book on prehistoric Wiltshire, the archaeologists David Field and David McOmish noted that a stone circle was "thought to have been present" in Hodson, and that any stones once part of it might now be found as some of the sarsens lying loose around the village or incorporated into the fabric of various buildings.[13]
References
Notes
Footnotes
- ^ a b Hutton 2013, p. 81.
- ^ Hutton 2013, pp. 91–94.
- ^ a b Hutton 2013, p. 94.
- ^ Burl 2000, p. 13.
- ^ Hutton 2013, p. 97.
- ^ a b Hutton 2013, p. 98.
- ^ Hutton 2013, pp. 97–98.
- ^ a b c Burl 2000, p. 310.
- ^ a b c Burl 2004, p. 197.
- ^ a b Burl 2000, p. 311.
- ^ a b Passmore 1894, p. 174.
- ^ a b c d Burl 2004, p. 205.
- ^ Field & McOmish 2017, p. 79.
Bibliography
- ISBN 978-0-300-08347-7.
- Burl, Aubrey (2004). "A. D. Passmore and the Stone Circles of North Wiltshire". Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine. 97: 197–210.
- Field, David; McOmish, David (2017). The Making of Prehistoric Wiltshire. Stroud: Amberley. ISBN 978-1-4456-4841-5.
- ISBN 978-0-300-19771-6.
- Passmore, A. D. (1894). "Notes on an Undescribed Stone Circle at Coate, near Swindon". Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine. 27: 171–174.