Johannes Schott

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Johannes Schott's printer's mark, 1502

Johannes Schott (19 June 1477 – c. 1550) was a book printer from

chiaroscuro woodcuts
.

Biography

Schott's father, Martin Schott, established a printing business in Strasbourg around 1480; his mother was one of the children of printer Johannes Mentelin. Johannes attended university in Freiburg (in 1490, at age 13), in Heidelberg (1492), and in Basel (1497). This German humanist education affected his later printing career; he likely edited the Enchiridion poëticum that his press printed in 1514. Prefaces to his books indicate his scholarly education, and he seems to have had personal relationships on equal footing with the scholars of his time.[1]

The first known book printed by him dates from 1500 (his father died in 1499); he was active as a printer for half a century.[1] A lull in his activity occurred between 1503 and 1508, when he produced only three books, all versions of the Margarita Philosophica, an encyclopedia by German humanist Gregor Reisch. The locations of those three books may indicate that the Schott press was moving around, with stops in Freiburg and Basel.[1] Kusukawa proposes that the first printing may have happened in Freiburg "to allow Schott to work closely with the author".[2]

Some 130 titles from his press are known, but the real number probably exceeds 150. They include many humanistic works (from Italian scholars and Germans, particularly

chiaroscuro woodcuts with three blocks.[1]

Copyright case

In 1533, Schott sued the Frankfurt printer Christian Egenolff, who had published the Kreuterbuch by Eucharius Rösslin. Schott maintained that Egenolff had violated the copyright laws (an imperial privilege for six years after publication)[2] by copying from his Herbarium Vivae Icones, illustrated by Hans Weiditz and compiled and annotated by Otto Brunfels.[5] Egenolff countered that his book was in fact copied from a much older book, by Johannes von Cube, and this was not forbidden. Furthermore, fifty of the images in his book were not in Schott's, and vice versa. Third, images based on nature are likely to resemble each other because the objects represented will be the same. Finally, there is no exclusive right on a subject, say Adam and Eve, that forbids an artist to depict it if someone else had already done so. It is not known how the lawsuit was decided.[2]

Notable books

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Steiff (1891). "Schott, Johannes". Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (in German). Vol. 32. pp. 402–404. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  2. ^ .
  3. ^ .
  4. ^ a b "Portraits of Luther and Erasmus". Notes and Queries. 15. 9 February 1850. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  5. .
  6. .
  7. ^ "The Elevation of the Cross from a set of The Passion". Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  8. ^ "Viscera and Bloodletting Man". Philadelphia Museum of Art. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  9. ^ "A Tour of Ptolemy's Maps". University of Minnesota. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  10. ^ .
  11. .