Lee wave

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The wind flows towards a mountain and produces a first oscillation (A) followed by more waves. The following waves will have lower amplitude because of the natural damping. Lenticular clouds stuck on top of the flow (A) and (B) will appear immobile despite the strong wind.
Lenticular clouds

In

They are
cloud street
.

The vertical motion forces periodic changes in

trough; this is called a rotor. The strongest lee waves are produced when the lapse rate shows a stable layer above the obstruction, with an unstable layer above and below.[4]

Strong winds (with wind gusts over 100 miles per hour (160 km/h)) can be created in the foothills of large mountain ranges by mountain waves.[6][7][8][9] These strong winds can contribute to unexpected wildfire growth and spread (including the 2016 Great Smoky Mountains wildfires when sparks from a wildfire in the Smoky Mountains were blown into the Gatlinburg and Pigeon Forge areas).[10]

Basic theory

A fluid dynamics lab experiment illustrates flow past a mountain-shaped obstacle. Downstream wave crests radiate upwards with their group velocity pointing about 45° from horizontal. A downslope jet can be seen in the lee of the mountain, an area of lower pressure, enhanced turbulence, and periodic vertical displacement of fluid parcels. Vertical dye lines indicate effects are also felt upstream of the mountain, an area of higher pressure.

Lee waves are a form of

stratified flow is forced over an obstacle. This disturbance elevates air parcels above their level of neutral buoyancy. Buoyancy restoring forces therefore act to excite a vertical oscillation of the perturbed air parcels at the Brunt-Väisäla frequency
, which for the atmosphere is:

, where is the vertical profile of potential temperature.

Oscillations tilted off the vertical axis at an angle of will occur at a lower frequency of . These air parcel oscillations occur in concert, parallel to the wave fronts (lines of constant phase). These wave fronts represent extrema in the perturbed pressure field (i.e., lines of lowest and highest pressure), while the areas between wave fronts represent extrema in the perturbed buoyancy field (i.e., areas most rapidly gaining or losing buoyancy).

Energy is transmitted along the wave fronts (parallel to air parcel oscillations), which is the direction of the wave group velocity. In contrast, the phase propagation (or phase speed) of the waves points perpendicular to energy transmission (or group velocity).[11][12]

Clouds

A wave window over the Bald Eagle Valley of central Pennsylvania as seen from a glider looking north. The wind flow is from upper left to lower right. The Allegheny Front is under the left edge of the window, the rising air is at the right edge, and the distance between them is 3–4 km.

Both lee waves and the rotor may be indicated by specific wave cloud formations if there is sufficient moisture in the atmosphere, and sufficient vertical displacement to cool the air to the dew point. Waves may also form in dry air without cloud markers.[4] Wave clouds do not move downwind as clouds usually do, but remain fixed in position relative to the obstruction that forms them.

Aviation

Lee waves provide a possibility for

Southern Alps mountain ranges.[13] The Perlan Project is working to demonstrate the viability of climbing above the tropopause in an unpowered glider using lee waves, making the transition into stratospheric standing waves. They did this for the first time on August 30, 2006 in Argentina, climbing to an altitude of 15,460 metres (50,720 ft).[14][15] The Mountain Wave Project of the Organisation Scientifique et Technique du Vol à Voile focusses on analysis and classification of lee waves and associated rotors.[16][17][18]

The conditions favoring strong lee waves suitable for soaring are:

  • A gradual increase in windspeed with altitude
  • Wind direction within 30° of perpendicular to the mountain ridgeline
  • Strong low-altitude winds in a stable atmosphere
  • Ridgetop winds of at least 20 knots

The rotor turbulence may be harmful for other small aircraft such as balloons, hang gliders and paragliders. It can even be a hazard for large aircraft; the phenomenon is believed responsible for many aviation accidents and incidents, including the in-flight breakup of BOAC Flight 911, a Boeing 707, near Mount Fuji, Japan in 1966, and the in-flight separation of an engine on an Evergreen International Airlines Boeing 747 cargo jet near Anchorage, Alaska in 1993.[19]

The rising air of the wave, which allows gliders to climb to great heights, can also result in high-altitude upset in jet aircraft trying to maintain level cruising flight in

stall
or loss of control.

Other varieties of atmospheric waves

Hydrostatic wave (schematic drawing)

There are a variety of distinctive types of waves which form under different atmospheric conditions.

  • atmospheric inversion separates two layers with a marked difference in wind direction. If the wind encounters distortions in the inversion layer caused by thermals coming up from below, it will create significant shear waves in the lee of the distortions that can be used for soaring.[20]

See also

References

  1. ^ On 10 March 1933, German glider pilot Hans Deutschmann (1911–1942) was flying over the Giant Mountains in Silesia when an updraft lifted his plane by a kilometre. The event was observed, and correctly interpreted, by German engineer and glider pilot Wolf Hirth (1900–1959), who wrote about it in: Wolf Hirth, Die hohe Schule des Segelfluges [The advanced school of glider flight] (Berlin, Germany: Klasing & Co., 1933). The phenomenon was subsequently studied by German glider pilot and atmospheric physicist Joachim P. Küttner (1909 -2011) in: Küttner, J. (1938) "Moazagotl und Föhnwelle" (Lenticular clouds and foehn waves), Beiträge zur Physik der Atmosphäre, 25, 79–114, and Kuettner, J. (1959) "The rotor flow in the lee of mountains." GRD [Geophysics Research Directorate] Research Notes No. 6, AFCRC[Air Force Cambridge Research Center]-TN-58-626, ASTIA [Armed Services Technical Information Agency] Document No. AD-208862.
  2. ISSN 0744-8996
    .
  3. ^ "Article about wave lift". Retrieved 2006-09-28.
  4. ^ . This is the ideal case, for an unstable layer below and above the stable layer create what can be described as a springboard for the stable layer to bounce on once the mountain begins the oscillation.
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. ^ Ryan Shadbolt; Joseph Charney; Hannah Fromm (2019). "A mesoscale simulation of a mountain wave wind event associated with the Chimney Tops 2 fire (2016)" (Special Symposium on Mesoscale Meteorological Extremes: Understanding, Prediction, and Projection). American Meteorological Society: 5 pp. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. .
  12. .
  13. ^ FAI gliding records Archived 2006-12-05 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ "Fai Record File". Archived from the original on 2015-04-13. Retrieved 2015-01-27.
  15. ^ Perlan Project
  16. ^ OSTIV-Mountain Wave Project
  17. ^ [1] Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine – accessed 2009-11-03
  18. ISSN 0744-8996
    .
  19. ^ NTSB Accident Report AAR-93-06
  20. .
  21. ^ Observations of Mountain-Induced Rotors and Related Hypotheses: a Review by Joachim Kuettner and Rolf F. Hertenstein

Further reading

  • Grimshaw, R., (2002). Environmental Stratified Flows. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Jacobson, M., (1999). Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nappo, C., (2002). An Introduction to Atmospheric Gravity Waves. Boston: Academic Press.
  • Pielke, R., (2002). Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling. Boston: Academic Press.
  • Turner, B., (1979). Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Whiteman, C., (2000). Mountain Meteorology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

External links