Mihai Stelescu

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Stelescu (front row, left) with Codreanu by his side during an Iron Guard rally in 1933.

Mihai Stelescu (1907 – July 16, 1936) was a Romanian political activist.

Biography

With the Iron Guard

Born in Galați,[1] he joined, while still in high school,[1] the Legion of the Archangel Michael (later also known as the Iron Guard), an ultra-nationalist, Fascist, and antisemitic political movement led by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.

A prominent activist in his native

Prime Minister Ion G. Duca — all were acquitted by a jury comprising Legion sympathisers.[3]

In September 1934, for mysterious reasons, Stelescu was investigated by a party jury under the leadership of Cantacuzino-Grănicerul;

Crusade of Romanianism
(Cruciada Românismului), and began publishing a weekly magazine of the same name, in which he fiercely attacked Codreanu and the Legion.

Dissidence and controversy

There are conflicting accounts of what caused Stelescu's dissidence. According to the Legion's version (published much later by Codreanu's successor,

Siguranța Statului, a hypothesis relying on a statement of the writer Panait Istrati, who was a sympathiser of Cruciada Românismului; he reportedly told the writer Alexandru Talex that Stelescu was "the man of those who keep me under surveillance"[7]
(a likely reference to Romanian authorities, suspicious of Istrati's earlier communist activism).

However, the Legionnaires bitterly hated Stelescu as an

apostate
, and that the details of the plot to assassinate Codreanu are hardly credible; at that time, the King would probably have supported anything that promised to reduce the Legion's growth and influence.

The dissidence may have been precipitated by the fact that Codreanu had assigned Cantacuzino-Grănicerul, rather than Stelescu, to lead the Legion's legal front, the All for the Fatherland Party (Partidul Totul pentru Țară), the political expression of the Legion at the time.[8] It is, however, more likely that Stelescu's motivations were primarily political: Stelescu, together with the more radical sections of the Guard, was arguably disenchanted with Codreanu's attempt focus on attempts to obtain legal power.[9]

At the same time, there is evidence that Stelescu questioned Codreanu's unconditional support for Nazi Germany (to which he preferred Italian fascism).[10] According to Grigore Traian Pop, who cites another piece of writing by Stelescu, this was not the case, Stelescu having become an adversary of both Nazism and Italian fascism.[11]

Stelescu also attacked the Guard's leader for maintaining secret contacts with the authorities and receiving bribes and subsidies, claiming that, in 1935, during the repression of the Guard, the leader had taken refuge in the residence of a female relative of

Elena Lupescu, the King's mistress — "While everybody was staying in Jilava, and in other prisons, you were being sheltered by a lady. She was a person adverse to your action. How did you get along so well?".[12] He also challenged Codreanu's public image by suggesting that the Guard's leader was in reality a bon viveur, as well as uncultured and a plagiarist.[11] On one occasion, he defied Codreanu's violent methods, writing an open letter stating: "[If I am to be killed,] I ask for one indulgence, let the 'Chief' in person come [and do it], and, if possible, not in the back".[13]

Crusade of Romanianism

Main article: Crusade of Romanianism

The Crusade of Romanianism was a nationalist and eclectic organisation, presenting a more

leftist and social colouring (its political programme included such items as decent wages, a mandatory 8-hour work day, and pensions for invalid workers) than other right-wing organisations of that time. Stelescu's dissidence may be compared to those of Otto Strasser or Manuel Hedilla.[14] According to Talex, Stelescu had the will to make a party.[15] Istrati probably contributed to balancing the ideologies in the Crusade's discourse.[16]

Stelescu received support from a small number of well-known personalities (the

People's Party (it also included for some time the short-lived Citizen Bloc, presided by Grigore Forțu).[17]

Death

In 1936, Stelescu was admitted to the Spitalul Brâncovenesc, a Bucharest hospital, for an appendectomy. While recovering, he was found by the Decemviri (the "Ten Men"), an Iron Guard death squad led by Ion Caratănase and probably created in 1935 in Târgu Mureș (during a youth congress tolerated by the Gheorghe Tătărescu executive).[18]

According to the Legion's version, the assassins riddled his body with some 200 bullets, after which they left the hospital unmolested and surrendered voluntarily to the police. The alternative version claims that the assassins fired some 120 bullets (other sources point a number as low as 38),[19] after which they attacked the cadaver with hatchets or axes, and danced around it until the police arrived.[20] The rumors, disseminated right after the murder, that members of the death squad had engaged in acts of cannibalism, are unfounded.[19]

All ten members of the Decemviri were immediately arrested. They were each found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in prison with hard labour. While officially both Codreanu and the Decemviri claimed that action had taken place without Codreanu's knowledge or consent, the probability remains highly unlikely;[21] furthermore, Codreanu personally awarded each one of them the White Cross while they were kept in prison.[21]

On November 30, 1938, all 10 members of the Decemviri, along with the Nicadori death squad and Codreanu, were killed during a purge of the Iron Guard ordered by King Carol II. The men were strangled to death while being transported to Jilava Prison. Their bodies were dissolved in acid, and placed under seven tons of concrete.

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Pop, p.44
  2. ^ Pop, p.45; Veiga, p.159
  3. ^ Ornea, p.300
  4. ^ a b Pop, p.45
  5. ^ Alexandrescu et al., p.23; Pop, p.45
  6. ^ Ornea, p.306; Pop, pp.46-47; Veiga, p.233, 241
  7. ^ Istrati, in Pop, p.45
  8. ^ Cosma, p.208
  9. ^ Veiga, pp.228-230
  10. ^ Veiga, p.229, 230
  11. ^ a b Pop, p.46
  12. ^ Stelescu, 1935, in Ornea, pp.298-299
  13. ^ Stelescu, 1935, in Ornea, p.307
  14. ^ Ioanid, pp.88–89
  15. ^ Talex, in Pop, p.44
  16. ^ Veiga, p.229
  17. ^ Gruber, Cap.V
  18. ^ Ornea, p.305, 307
  19. ^ a b Pop, p.47
  20. ^ Cosma, p.210; Ioanid, p.89; Veiga, p.229
  21. ^ a b Cosma, p.211; Pop, p.47

References

  • Ion Alexandrescu, Ion Bulei, Ion Mamina, and Ioan Scurtu (1995) Partidele politice din România, 1862–1994: Enciclopedie, Bucharest, Editura Mediaprint,
    ISBN 973-96934-0-7
    (in Romanian)
  • Neagu Cosma (1998) Culisele Palatului Regal, Ediție revăzută și adăugită, Bucharest, Editura Globus.
    ISBN 973-49-0099-4
    (in Romanian)
  • (in Romanian) Victoria Gabriela Gruber, Summary of Partidul Național Liberal (Gheorghe Brătianu) (PDF file)
  • Radu Ioanid (1990) The Sword of the Archangel: Fascist Ideology in Romania, East European Monographs, No. 292, Boulder, New York, East European Monographs,
    ISBN 0-88033-189-5
  • Șerban N. Ionescu (1994) Who Was Who in Twentieth-Century Romania, Boulder, New York: East European Monographs, No. 395,
    ISBN 0-88033-292-1
  • ISBN 973-9155-43-X
    (in Romanian)
  • Grigore Traian Pop, "Cînd disidența se pedepsește cu moartea. Un asasinat ritual: Mihail Stelescu", in Dosarele Istoriei, 6/IV (1999)
  • ISBN 84-7488-497-7
    )
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mihai_Stelescu&oldid=1220281392"