Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (February 2009) |
Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (
Mimesis is arranged in twenty sections, in chronological order. Each section analyses one to three works from the particular period, often beginning with a lengthy extract from the work, given in the original language and English translation. Nearly all the passages selected are narratives of some sort (# 12, covering an essay by Michel de Montaigne is one exception). The literary forms covered include epic poetry, novels, plays, memoirs and letters.
The book opens with a comparison between the way the world is represented in
Overview
Mimesis gives an account of the way in which
The mode of literary criticism in which Mimesis operates is often referred to among contemporary critics as
to make much broader claims about cultural and historical questions. Of Mimesis, Auerbach wrote that his "purpose is always to write history."He is in the same German tradition of
Chapters
# | Chapter title | Main works discussed |
---|---|---|
1 | Odysseus' Scar | Odyssey by Homer and Genesis 22 |
2 | Fortunata | Satyricon by Petronius, Annals Book 1 by Tacitus and Mark ch. 14 |
3 | The Arrest of Peter Valvomeres | Res Gestae by Ammianus Marcellinus |
4 | Sicharius and Chramnesindus | History of the Franks by Gregory of Tours
|
5 | Roland Against Ganelon | Chanson de Roland
|
6 | The Knight Sets Forth | Yvain by Chrétien de Troyes
|
7 | Adam and Eve | The medieval mystery play St. Francis of Assisi
|
8 | Farinata and Cavalcante | The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri
|
9 | Frate Alberto | The Decameron by Giovanni Boccaccio |
10 | Madame Du Chastel | Le Réconfort de Madame du Fresne by Antoine de la Sale |
11 | The World in Pantagruel's Mouth | Gargantua and Pantagruel by François Rabelais |
12 | L'Humaine Condition | Essays by Michel de Montaigne
|
13 | The Weary Prince | Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2 by William Shakespeare |
14 | The Enchanted Dulcinea | Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes |
15 | The Faux Dévot | Tartuffe by Molière |
16 | The Interrupted Supper | Manon Lescaut by Abbé Prévost; Candide by Voltaire; Mémoires by Louis de Rouvroy, duc de Saint-Simon |
17 | Miller the Musician | Luise Miller by Friedrich Schiller
|
18 | In the Hôtel de la Mole | The Red and the Black by Stendhal and Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert |
19 | Germinie Lacerteux | Germinie Lacerteux by Edmond and Jules de Goncourt and Germinal by Émile Zola |
20 | The Brown Stocking | To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf and In Search of Lost Time by Marcel Proust |
Position and evaluation of rhetoric
To the consternation of his colleague Ernst Curtius,[citation needed] Auerbach's work is marked by an openly anti-rhetorical position. Auerbach criticizes classical writers such as Homer, Tacitus and Petronius, as well as medieval theologians (except St. Augustine) and writers of the seventeenth century, like Racine, for their adherence to the rhetorical doctrine of "styles" with their corresponding subject matters: the low style's association with the comedic and the popular classes, and the elevated style's association with the tragic, the historic and the heroic. Auerbach sees the Bible as opposing this rhetorical doctrine in its serious and poignant portrayals of common folk and their encounter with the divine. As Auerbach notes in Chapter 2 when discussing the New Testament:
- But the spirit of rhetoric — a spirit which classified subjects in genera and invested every subject with a specific form of style as one garment becoming it in virtue of its nature [i.e. lower classes with the farcical low-style, upper classes with the tragic, the historic and the sublime elevated-style] — could not extend its dominion to them [the Bible writers] for the simple reason that their subject would not fit into any of the known genres. A scene like Peter's denial fits into no antique genre. It is too serious for comedy, too contemporary and everyday for tragedy, politically too insignificant for history — and the form which was given it is one of such immediacy that its like does not exist in the literature of antiquity.[5]: 45
The Bible will ultimately be responsible for the "
Auerbach champions[
Critical reception
Mimesis is a sprawling, wide-ranging work. It has been praised for its insights on the particular works it addresses, and for the way the author revels in the complexities of each work and epoch without resorting to reductive generalities. At the same time, it has been criticized for its lack of a single overarching theme or claim. For this reason, individual chapters of the book are often read independently.
Auerbach summarizes his comparison of the texts as follows:
- The two styles, in their opposition, represent basic types: on the one hand [The Odyssey's] fully externalized description, uniform illustration, uninterrupted connection, free expression, all events in the foreground, displaying unmistakable meanings, few elements of historical development and of psychological perspective; on the other hand [in the Old Testament], certain parts brought into high relief, others left obscure, abruptness, suggestive influence of the unexpressed, "background" quality, multiplicity of meanings and the need for interpretation, universal-historical claims, development of the concept of the historically becoming, and preoccupation with the problematic.
Auerbach concludes by arguing that the "full development" of these two styles, the rhetorical tradition with its constraints on representing reality and the Biblical or "realist" tradition with its engagement of everyday experience, exercised a "determining influence upon the representation of reality in European literature."
By far the most frequently reprinted chapter is Chapter 1, "Odysseus' Scar," in which Auerbach compares the scene in book 19 of Homer’s Odyssey, when Odysseus finally returns home from his two decades of warring and journeying, to Genesis 22, the story of The Binding of Isaac. Highlighting the rhetorically determined simplicity of characters in the Odyssey (what he calls the "external") against what he regards as the psychological depth of the figures in the Old Testament, Auerbach suggests that the Old Testament gives a more powerful and historical impression than the Odyssey, which he classifies as closer to "legend" in which all details are fleshed out in a leisurely manner and all actions occur in a simple present – indeed even flashbacks are narrated in the present tense. It is in the context of this comparison between the Biblical and the Homeric that Auerbach draws his famous conclusion that the Bible's claim to truth is "tyrannical," since
- What he [the writer of the Old Testament] produced then, was not primarily oriented towards "realism" (if he succeeded in being realistic, it was merely a means, not an end): it was oriented to truth.
By the time Auerbach treats the work of
References
- S2CID 233317165.
- ISBN 0-691-01269-5. 557.
- Aeon. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
- ^ Edward W. Said (2013). Introduction to Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. First Princeton Classic edition. Trans. Willard Trask. ISBN 978-0-691-16022-1. Princeton: Princeton University Press. xii.
- ISBN 0-691-01269-5.
- ISBN 978-1-4008-4795-2.
Bibliography
- Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. Trans. Willard Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
- Bakker, Egbert. "Mimesis as Performance: Rereading Auerbach’s First Chapter." Poetics Today 20.1 (1999): 11–26.
- Baldick, Chris. “Realism.” Oxford Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 184.
- Bremmer, Jan. "Erich Auerbach and His Mimesis." Poetics Today 20.1 (1999): 3–10.
- Calin, William. "Erich Auerbach’s Mimesis – ’Tis Fifty Years Since: A Reassessment." Style 33.3 (1999): 463–74.
- Doran, Robert. "Literary History and the Sublime in Erich Auerbach's Mimesis." New Literary History 38.2 (2007): 353–69.
- Green, Geoffrey. "Erich Auerbach." Literary Criticism & the Structures of History: Erich Auerbach & Leo Spitzer. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1982.
- Holmes, Jonathan, and Streete, Adrian, eds. Refiguring Mimesis: Representation in Early Modern Literature. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005.
- Holquist, Michael. “Erich Auerbach and the Fate of Philology Today.” Poetics Today 20.1 (1999): 77-91.
- Landauer, Carl. "Mimesis and Erich Auerbach’s Self-Mythologizing." German Studies Review 11.1 (1988): 83-96.
- Lerer, Seth. Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
- Nuttall, A. D. "New Impressions V: Auerbach’s Mimesis." Essays in Criticism 54.1 (2004): 60-74.
- Said, Edward W. Introduction to Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. First Princeton Classic edition. Trans. Willard Trask. ISBN 978-0-691-16022-1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
Further reading
- "The Book of Books: Erich Auerbach and the making of Mimesis", by Arthur Krystal in The New Yorker (Dec. 9, 2013)