New England hotspot

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The New England hotspot is marked 28 on this map.
Bear seamount
.

The New England hotspot, also referred to as the Great Meteor hotspot and sometimes the Monteregian hotspot, is a

hotspot track has been used to estimate the movement of the North American Plate away from the African Plate from the early Cretaceous period to the present using the fixed hotspot reference frame.[4]

Geologic history

The geologic history of the New England hotspot is the subject of much debate among geoscientists. The conventional opinion is that volcanic activity associated with the hotspot results from movement of the

White Mountains in New Hampshire around 124-100 Ma. As the plate moved further west, the plume moved offshore, forming the New England Seamounts between 103 and 83 Ma. After the formation of the Nashville Seamount around 83 Ma, there was a pause in volcanic activity and the volcanic center shifted north, creating the Corner Rise Seamounts around 80-76 Ma. The Mid-Atlantic Ridge passed over the plume around 76 Ma and renewed volcanic activity produced the Seewarte Seamounts on the African Plate between 26 and 10 Ma.[1][2][3][4]

Evidence for a plume origin includes the above age progression, seismic anomalies in the lower mantle under the Great Meteor Seamount (though these do not extend into the upper mantle as expected for a plume),[5][6] and helium isotope ratios in groundwater in the Monteregian Hills which indicate a deep mantle source.[7] The lack of an obvious hotspot track west of Montreal has previously been ascribed to failure of the plume to penetrate the Canadian Shield, a lack of recognizable intrusions due to erosion, or strengthening of the plume when it approached the Monteregian Hills,[1][8] but more recent research has found kimberlite fields in Ontario and New York dated between 180 and 134 Ma and at Rankin Inlet to the northwest of Hudson Bay dated between 214-192 Ma which may represent an older, continental extension of the hotspot track.[9]

Some evidence, such the lack of an initial flood

plutons which indicates a lithospheric mantle source,[14]
support this interpretation.

See also

References

  1. ^
    doi:10.1029/JB095iB13p21983
    .
  2. ^
    hdl:1912/5785
    .
  3. ^
    ISBN 0-521-80604-6
    .
  4. ^
    doi:10.1029/JB089iB12p09980
    .
  5. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2007.03.001
    .
  6. ISBN 978-4-431-55359-5
    .
  7. S2CID 225328667
    .
  8. doi:10.1139/e95-109
    .
  9. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00079-0
    .
  10. ^ a b McHone, J.G. (1996). "Constraints on the mantle plume model for Mesozoic alkaline intrusions in northeastern North America". The Canadian Mineralogist. 34 (2): 325–334.
  11. ^
    doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00260-7
    .
  12. ^
    doi:10.1016/0040-1951(95)00113-1
    .
  13. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2009.01.001
    .
  14. doi:10.1139/cjes-2012-0145
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_England_hotspot&oldid=1154894314"