New institutionalism
Neo institutionalism (also referred to as neo-institutionalist theory or institutionalism) is an approach to the study of institutions that focuses on the constraining and enabling effects of formal and informal rules on the behavior of individuals and groups.[1] New institutionalism traditionally encompasses three major strands: sociological institutionalism, rational choice institutionalism, and historical institutionalism.[2][3] New institutionalism originated in work by sociologist John Meyer published in 1977.[4]
History
The study of institutions and their interactions has been a focus of academic research for many years. In the late 19th and early 20th century, social theorists began to systematize this body of literature. One of the most prominent examples of this was the work of German economist and social theorist
Institutionalism experienced a significant revival in 1977 with two influential papers by John W. Meyer and Brian Rowan on one hand and Lynn Zucker on the other.[7][8] The revised formulation of institutionalism proposed in this paper prompted a significant shift in the way institutional analysis was conducted. Research that followed became known as "new" institutionalism, a concept that is generally referred to as "neo-institutionalism" in academic literature. Another significant reformulation occurred with Paul DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell's paper on isomorphism.[9][8] The three papers had in common that they explained the practices of organizations not in terms of efficacy and efficiency, but in terms of legitimacy. The functions of an organization did not necessarily reflect rational or optimal ends, but were instead myths, ceremonies and scripts that had a veneer of rationality.[8]
The following decade saw an explosion of literature on the topic across many disciplines, including those outside of the social sciences. Examples of the body of work in the decade which followed can be found in DiMaggio and Powell's 1991 anthology in the field of sociology;[8] in economics, the Nobel Prize-winning work of Douglass North is a noted example.
More-recent work has begun to emphasize multiple competing logics,[10][11] focusing on the more-heterogeneous sources of diversity within fields[11] and the institutional embeddedness of technical considerations.[12][13] The concept of logic generally refers to broader cultural beliefs and rules that structure cognition and guide decision-making in a field. At the organization level, logic can focus the attention of key decision-makers on a delimited set of issues and solutions,[14] leading to logic-consistent decisions that reinforce extant organizational identities and strategies.[15] In line with the new institutionalism, social rule system theory stresses that particular institutions and their organizational instantiations are deeply embedded in cultural, social, and political environments and that particular structures and practices are often reflections of as well as responses to rules, laws, conventions, paradigms built into the wider environment.[16]
Old institutionalism
Kathleen Thelen and Sven Steinmo contrast New Institutionalism with "Old Institutionalism", which was overwhelmingly focused on detailed narratives of institutions, with little focus on comparative analyses. Thus, the Old Institutionalism was unhelpful for comparative research and explanatory theory. This "Old Institutionalism" began to be undermined when scholars increasingly highlighted how the formal rules and administrative structures of institutions were not accurately describing the behavior of actors and policy outcomes.[17]
Definition of institution
There is no agreed upon definition of institution in new institutionalist scholarship.[8] Mats Alvesson and Andre Spicer wrote in 2018 that it had become "difficult to agree what an institution is not – because institutions have become everything... When the term institution is defined, it is done so in broad and vague ways."[8]
Diversity of scholarship
Numerous scholarly approaches have been described as being part of New institutionalism.[2][5][18]
Sociological institutionalism
Sociological institutionalism is a form of new institutionalism that concerns "the way in which institutions create meaning for individuals, providing important theoretical building blocks for normative institutionalism within political science".[19] Some sociological institutionalists argue that institutions have developed to become similar (showing an isomorphism) across organizations even though they evolved in different ways.[20][7] Institutions are therefore seen as important in cementing and propagating cultural norms.[21] Sociological institutionalists also emphasize how the functions and structures of organizations do not necessarily reflect functional purposes, but rather ceremonies and rituals.[3][7] Actors comply with institutional rules and norms because other types of behavior are inconceivable; actors follow routines because they take a for-granted quality.[22][23]
Normative institutionalism is a
New institutional economics
New institutional economics (NIE) is an economic perspective that attempts to extend economics by focusing on the institutions (that is to say the social and legal norms and rules) that underlie economic activity and with analysis beyond earlier institutional economics and neoclassical economics. It can be seen as a broadening step to include aspects excluded in neoclassical economics. It rediscovers aspects of classical political economy. Major scholars associated with the subject include
A convergence of such researchers resulted in founding the Society for Institutional & Organizational Economics (formerly the International Society for New Institutional Economics) in 1997.Rational choice institutionalism
Rational choice institutionalism is a theoretical approach to the study of institutions arguing that actors use
According to Erik Voeten, rational choice scholarship on institutions can be divided between (1) rational functionalism and (2) Distributive rationalism.[38] The former sees organizations as functional optimal solutions to collective problems, whereas the latter sees organizations as an outcome of actors' individual and collective goals.[38] Since individual and collective goals may conflict, the latter version of RCI accepts that suboptimal institutions are likely.[39]
Historical institutionalism
Emphasizes how timing, sequences and
Discursive institutionalism
Proponents of discursive institutionalism, such as Vivien Schmidt, emphasize how ideas and discourses affect institutional stability and change.[47][48]
Constructivist institutionalism
Constructivist institutionalists[49] assert that political, social, or policy discourses can perform communicative functions: actors publicly expressing ideas can lead to social change, or coordinating functions. Thus ideas and meaning provide a mechanism for multiple actors to achieve consensus on norms and values and thus create social change.[50] This is increasingly moving beyond political science and into international relations theory and foreign policy analysis.[51][52]
Feminist institutionalism
Feminist institutionalism is a new institutionalist approach which looks at "how gender norms operate within institutions and how institutional processes construct and maintain gender power dynamics".[19]
See also
References
- JSTOR 40752104.
- ^ S2CID 3133316.
- ^ S2CID 149806588
- ISBN 978-0-226-67709-5.
- ^ )
- S2CID 143375959.
- ^ a b c Meyer & Rowan 1977.
- ^ S2CID 150260582.
- ^ DiMaggio & Powell 1983, pp. 147–60.
- ^ Friedland & Alford 1991.
- ^ a b Lounsbury 2001.
- ^ Scott et al. 2000.
- ^ Thornton 2004.
- ^ Ocasio 1997.
- ^ Thornton 2002.
- ^ Powell 2007.
- ^ "Structuring politics historical institutionalism comparative analysis". Cambridge University Press. 1992. pp. 3–4. Retrieved 2020-02-29.
- S2CID 242915266
- ^ a b Lowndes, Vivien (2010), "The Institutional Approach", in Marsh, D.; Stoker, G. (eds.), Theories and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave, p. 65
- ^ DiMaggio & Powell 1991.
- JSTOR 10.7591/j.ctt1rv61rh.
- OCLC 945411429.
- ^ Schmidt, V.A. (2010), Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth 'new institutionalism'.
- ^ March, James G. (1994), Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Free Press, pp. 57–58.
- ^ Harold Demsetz (1967). "Toward a Theory of Property Rights," American Economic Review, 57(2), pp. 347–359[dead link].
- ^ Harold Demsetz (1969) "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint," Journal of Law and Economics, 12(1), pp. [1][dead link].
- ^ Steven N. S. Cheung (1970). "The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource," Journal of Law and Economics, 13(1), pp. 49–70.
- ^ S. N. S. Cheung (1973). "The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation," Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), pp. 11–33.
- ^ Ronald Coase (1998). "The New Institutional Economics," American Economic Review, 88(2), pp. 72–74.
- ^ R. H. Coase (1991). "The Institutional Structure of Production," Nobel Prize Lecture PDF, reprinted in 1992, American Economic Review, 82(4), pp. 713–719.
- ^ Douglass C. North (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Douglass C. North (1995). "The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development," in The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C. M. Lewis, ed., pp. 17–26.
- ^ Elinor Ostrom (2005). "Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper than Markets and Hierarchies," Handbook of New Institutional Economics, C. Ménard and M. Shirley, eds. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, pp. 819–848. Springer.
- .
- ^ Keefer, Philip; Knack, Stephen (2005). "Social capital, social norms and the New Institutional Economics". Handbook of New Institutional Economics. pp. 700–725.
- ^ "Introductory Reading List: New Institutional Economics". Ronald Coase Institute.
- ISBN 978-0-472-10588-5.
- ^ ISSN 1094-2939.
- S2CID 41593236.
- ^ ISSN 1094-2939.
- S2CID 153647117.
- S2CID 154860619.
- ^ Steinmo, S; Thelen, K; Longstreth, F, eds. (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- ISSN 1086-3338.
- ISBN 978-0-19-966281-4.
- hdl:10072/393898.
- ISSN 1094-2939.
- S2CID 146179398.
- ISBN 978-0-19-954846-0.
- ^ Dodds, Anneliese (2013), Comparative Public Policy, Palgrave MacMillan.
- ISBN 978-0-41560310-2.
- S2CID 153658871.
Bibliography and further reading
- Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
- S2CID 145811736.
- DiMaggio, Paul J.; Powell, Walter W. (April 1983). "The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields". JSTOR 2095101.
- ———; Powell, Walter W., eds. (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.
- Friedland, Roger; Alford, Robert R. (1991). Powell, Walter W.; DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.). "Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions". The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 232–63.
- Jepperson, Ronald L. (1991), "Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism", in Powell, Walter W.; DiMaggio, Paul J (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143–63.
- Krücken, Georg; Drori, Gili S., eds. (2009), World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer, Oxford: University Press, ISBN 9780199593439.
- Krücken, Georg; Mazza, Carmelo; Meyer, Renate; Walgenbach, Peter, eds. (2017), New Themes in Institutional Analysis. Topics and Issues from European Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, ISBN 9781784716868.
- S2CID 145613530.
- ——— (April 2007). "A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds". S2CID 67820131.
- Olsen, Johan P.(1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press (also Italian, Japanese, Polish and Spanish (Mexico) editions).
- Meyer, Heinz-Dieter and Brian Rowan, 2006. The New Institutionalism in Education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Meyer, John W.; Rowan, Brian (1991), "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony", in Powell, W.; DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- ———; Rowan, Brian (September 1977). "Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony". S2CID 141398636.
- Nicita, Antonio; Vatiero, Massimiliano (July 2007). "The contract and the market: towards a broader notion of transaction?" (PDF). Studi e Note di Economia. 12 (1): 7–22. S2CID 166964883. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2011-09-27.
- Ocasio, William (July 1997). "Towards An Attention‐Based View of The Firm". Strategic Management Journal. 18 (S1): 187–206. S2CID 221895930.
- Parto, Saeed. 2003. Economic Activity and Institutions, Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL.
- Powell, W.W. (2007). "The New Institutionalism". The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Scott, Richard W. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- ———; Ruef, M.; Mendel, P.; Caronna, C. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations : from professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC 42689995.
- Thornton, Patricia H. (February 2002). "The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics". JSTOR 3069286.
- ——— (2004). Markets from culture : institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, OCLC 53483582.