Pitch (climbing)
In
Modern climbing ropes are typically 60–70 metres (200–230 ft) in length, which sets the theoretical maximum length of a 'pitch', however, other factors mean that the average pitch on a multi-pitch route is circa 30–40 metres (98–131 ft) in length. Advanced climbing techniques such as simul climbing can materially reduce—and even completely remove—the need for 'pitches' on a multi-pitch climbing route. The term is also used in caving.
Description
In climbing (including rock climbing, mountaineering, and ice climbing), the term 'pitch' is used in connection with lead climbing to describe the length of a section of a climbing route between belays of the 'lead climber'. A route that requires a leader to be belayed only once (ignoring any follow-up belay of the 'second climber' by the leader), is called a 'single-pitch climb'; where there are multiple belays of the leader, it is called a 'multi-pitch climb'. The term is also applied to the reverse process of abseiling, where it denotes the number of anchor points needed to complete the abseil (abseil anchor points are often, but not always, lead climbing belay points).[1][2]
Most lead climbing—and particularly
Multi-pitch climbing introduces greater risk and requires greater skills and additional
Length
A single-pitch route can range from 7 metres (23 ft) to the full length of the climbing rope (by definition, the longest belay of a 'leader' is limited by the length of the rope). In the 1960s to the 1980s, climbing ropes were typically 50 metres (160 ft) in length, however, modern ropes are typically 60–70 metres (200–230 ft) in length (and can extend to 80–100 metres (260–330 ft)), which sets the current theoretical maximum length of a 'pitch'.[7]
On multi-pitch routes, the typical average length of a pitch tends to be in the 30–40 metres (98–131 ft) range, which is well inside the length of the most commonly used modern climbing ropes. This is due to the effect of other factors that also determine the ideal length of pitches (and thus the total number of pitches) on a multi-pitch route, including:[1]
- Belay stations. In multi-pitch climbing, the availability of secure—and comfortable—belay stations is an important factor for the safety of the climbers; thus where a particularly good belay station presents itself, a pitch might be shortened to avail of it.[1]
- Equipment weight. Longer climbing ropes mean greater weight (and more rope drag) on the lead climber. In addition, the SCLDs on a crack climbing route), and thus more manageable pitch lengths are preferred.[1]
- Obstacles and features. Overhangs, roofs, and traverses may require pitches to be broken up to enable the climbers to set themselves up properly. Danger zones (e.g. couloirs prone to avalanche or rockfall) may also have shorter pitches to get both climbers out of the danger area quickly.[1]
- Rope drag. If the line of a pitch is not straight but instead follows an indirect or a zig-zag line (of the rope drag, which can limit the length of the pitch (i.e. the pitch has to be broken up into smaller sections).[1]
- Technical difficulty. If the technical grade of a pitch is high—and particularly relative to the other pitches on the route—then it may be shortened to give the leader a rest after completing it. Conversely, pitches of easier relative technical grades can often be full rope lengths.[1]
Linking pitches
On long but easier routes, the climbing pair may use simul climbing (or a running belay), whereby both climbers simultaneously ascend the route. The 'lead climber' acts like on a normal lead climb, however, the 'second' does not remain belaying in a static position, but instead also climbs, removing/unclipping the protection equipment of the 'lead climber'. Both climbers are tied to the rope at all times, and both make sure that there are several points of protection in situ between them. Simul climbing is only performed on terrain both climbers are comfortable on, as any fall is serious; often the stronger climber goes second. In such a scenario, the concept of a 'pitch' is redundant as the pair keeps moving through the belay stations that mark the end of a normal pitch.[9]
Simul climbing techniques, and the linking of pitches, are very common in
Speed climbing on multi-pitch rock climbing routes can also use simul-climbing techniques for greater efficiency. For example, many speed climbing pairs on the 31-pitch route, The Nose, use simul-climbing on the easier established pitches, thus reducing the number of actual pitches (i.e. a 'leader' being belayed by the 'second' who is static) that they need, which significantly speeds up their rate of ascent.[11][12]
In addition, free solo climbing, which by definition avoids using any form of belaying (and therefore any need for any belay stations), can link all the pitches on a route together, with the free soloist only stopping at rest points (which may or may not be a belay station); the concept of a pitch is, therefore, less relevant in free solo climbing.
The techniques of simul-climbing and free solo climbing—both of which avoid climbing in 'pitches', as there is no need for a belay—involve significantly greater risk to the climber(s), but by definition make the concept of a 'pitch' redundant.[12]
In caving
The term 'pitch' is also used by
See also
- List of grade milestones in rock climbing, records in single-pitch and multi-pitch climbing
References
- ^ ISBN 978-1846892622.
Determining the length of a pitch
- ^ ISBN 978-1493027668.
- ^ ISBN 978-1493056262.
- ^ Ryan, Mick; James, Alan (July 2002). How to write ... a MiniGuide (PDF). RockFax. pp. 1–15. Retrieved 26 August 2023.
- ^ "The Nightcrawler". Mountain Project. 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ "Brych VI+". theCrag. 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ Potter, Stephen (27 July 2022). "Your Complete Guide to Rock Climbing Ropes". Climbing. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ "The Nose 5.9, C2, VI". theCrag. 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ Oakley, Miranda (23 December 2022). "Advanced Climbing Techniques: Simul-Climbing and Short-Fixing". Climbing. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
- ^ Geldhard, Jack (20 April 2011). "The North Face of the Eiger - 1938 Route". UKClimbing. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ Ellison, Julie (27 September 2018). "The Highs and Lows of El Cap Speed". Climbing. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ a b Skenazy, Matt (12 May 2022). "The Outrageously High Cost of Speed Climbing". Outside. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
Further reading
- ISBN 978-1846892622.
- Ron Funderburke (May 2019). Climbing: From Single Pitch to Multipitch (Illustrated ed.). ISBN 978-1493027668.
- Chelton, Neil (June 2019). Sport Climbing Basics: Single and Multi-Pitch Bolted Routes. VDiffClimbing. ISBN 978-1796923278.
External links
- What is a Pitch, HardClimbs (2023)
- Multi-pitch Climbing 101: The Complete Guide, by Willis Kuelthau of 99Boulders (2021)