Priscus (magister militum)
Priscus | |
---|---|
Allegiance | Byzantine–Sassanid Wars |
Relations | Husband of Domentzia, son-in-law of Emperor Phocas and Leontia |
Priscus or Priskos (
Biography
Under Maurice
Priscus first appears in the historical sources when he was appointed, in late 587 or early 588, to command in the East
Despite this debacle, in the same summer he was entrusted with the post of magister militum for
In spring 593, Priscus was re-appointed in command as commander of the cavalry in Thrace, with
In late 594, however, after Peter was heavily defeated by the Slavs,[13] Priscus was again appointed to command as magister militum of Thrace, a post he proceeded to hold continuously for several years. In 595, he marched up the Danube, crossing the river and marching along its northern bank to Novae, despite the khagan's protests. There, he learned that Singidunum had been captured by the Avars. He sailed his army to the city and, after failed face-to-face negotiations with the khagan, sent the taxiarches Guduin to recapture it. The Avars, having razed the city's walls, abandoned it at the approach of the Byzantine force.[14] Next the Avars launched a raid against Dalmatia. Guduin was dispatched with 2,000 men to shadow them. He managed to ambush the Avar detachment carrying their booty, recovered it and sent it to Priscus. After these events, the khagan turned west to campaign against the Bavarians and the Franks, leaving the Byzantine territories quiet for a period of a year and a half, until the summer of 597. Nevertheless, Priscus and his army remained on watch along the Danube border.[15]
When the Avars resumed their operations with a large invasion in autumn 597, they appear to have caught Priscus, who was probably operating with his army at the eastern
After this success, which secured the Balkans, Maurice intended to consolidate Roman control by bringing in Armenian settlers who would be given land in exchange for military service. To this end, Priscus was sent to Armenia to recruit men and their families. His mission there, however, was interrupted by a large-scale military revolt that brought about the downfall of Maurice.[22][23] In 602, Maurice again ordered his troops on the Danube frontier to winter north of the river. Again, this provoked widespread discontent, and when Peter, who had replaced Priscus, refused to bow down and rescind the order, an outright mutiny broke out. The army chose the officer Phocas as its new leader and marched down to Constantinople. Without any credible military forces of his own, Maurice had to flee, but was captured with his family and executed by Phocas, who now became emperor.[24]
Under Phocas
Due to his absence from Constantinople at the time of Phocas's takeover, and because he retained a large measure of support within the soldiery, Priscus was the only one of Maurice's senior generals who was retained by the new regime,
Phocas's rule lacked legitimacy and quickly came to be resented by the populace and the elites of the Byzantine Empire. What prestige he had further eroded when the Persian shah
Under Heraclius
After Phocas's fall, Heraclius became emperor of Byzantium. The
Assessment
Priscus comes across as an able and versatile military leader. In many instances, his operations against the Slavs resemble the prescriptions of the most influential Byzantine military manual, the Strategikon, ascribed to Emperor Maurice.[37] Despite his reputation as a strict disciplinarian and his aloof stance which led to the mutiny of 588,[33] in later campaigns he showed ability in dealing with the soldiers and calming their discontent.[25] This cleverness was also employed against the Avar khagan. For instance, during the siege of Tomi in 598, Priscus managed to persuade the Avars to supply the Byzantine army, which was in fact close to starvation, with grain. As the scholar Walter Kaegi comments, Priscus's policy in defending the Danube frontier consisted in keeping the peace with the khagan "by sly negotiations", allowing him focus his efforts against the Slavs raiding imperial territory.[25]
The main Byzantine source for the period, Theophylact Simocatta, displays a marked bias in favour of Priscus, especially in its account of the Balkan campaigns, where the other generals are denigrated and made to appear incompetent, with their achievements regularly belittled while Priscus's successes are extolled and his defeats glossed over. This may be due to the fact that for this period, Simocatta relied on a semi-official "campaign log" compiled during the years of Emperor Phocas, when Priscus was pre-eminent while most of his rivals were either executed or in exile.[38]
References
- ^ Martindale 1992, pp. 1052–1053.
- ^ a b Greatrex & Lieu 2002, p. 170.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, p. 72.
- ^ a b c Martindale 1992, p. 1053.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 72–75; Whitby 1988, pp. 154, 286–288.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 162–164.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 162, 164–166.
- ^ Martindale 1992, pp. 1053–1054; Whitby & Whitby 1986, p. 167 (Note #35).
- ^ a b Martindale 1992, p. 1054.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 167–173; Curta 2001, pp. 100–102.
- ^ Curta 2001, p. 103; Whitby & Whitby 1986, p. 173.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 176–178.
- ^ Martindale 1992, pp. 1009–1010; Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 179–185.
- ^ Martindale 1992, pp. 1054–1055; Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 186–188, 193–194.
- ^ a b c Martindale 1992, p. 1055; Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 194–196.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 196–197.
- ^ a b Treadgold 1997, p. 234.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 197–202.
- ^ Curta 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Whitby & Whitby 1986, pp. 210–214.
- ^ Whitby 1988, p. 164.
- ^ Whitby 1988, pp. 167–168, 177.
- ^ a b c Martindale 1992, p. 1056.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 235; Martindale 1992, pp. 1031–1032.
- ^ a b c d e Kaegi 1991, p. 1722.
- ^ Martindale 1992, pp. 324, 1010–1011, 1025.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 239.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, pp. 37, 39; Treadgold 1997, pp. 236–239.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, pp. 42–43.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, pp. 43–49.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, p. 43; Martindale 1992, pp. 1056–1057.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, p. 52.
- ^ a b c d Martindale 1992, p. 1057.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, p. 70.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 287–288; Kaegi 2003, pp. 68–69; Greatrex & Lieu 2002, pp. 188–189.
- ^ Kaegi 2003, pp. 69–70; Treadgold 1997, p. 289.
- ^ Curta 2001, pp. 50, 58–59.
- ^ Whitby 1988, pp. 93, 98–105; Curta 2001, p. 56.
Sources
- ISBN 9781139428880.
- Greatrex, Geoffrey; ISBN 0-415-14687-9.
- ISBN 0-19-504652-8.
- ISBN 0-521-81459-6.
- ISBN 0-521-20160-8.
- ISBN 0-8047-2630-2.
- ISBN 978-0-19-822799-1.
- ISBN 0-19-822945-3.