Sir Ewan Forbes, 11th Baronet
MBChB | |
---|---|
Tenure | 1968–1991 |
Predecessor | William Forbes-Sempill, 19th Lord Sempill |
Successor | John Alexander Cumnock Forbes, 12th Baronet |
Other names | Ewan Forbes-Sempill |
Born | Elizabeth Forbes-Sempill 6 September 1912 |
Died | 12 September 1991 | (aged 79)
Residence | Brux Castle |
Spouse(s) | |
Parents | John Forbes-Sempill, 18th Lord Sempill Gwendolyn Prodger |
Occupation | General practitioner, farmer |
Sir Ewan Forbes, 11th Baronet,
In 1965, he stood to inherit the baronetcy of his elder brother William, Lord Sempill, together with a large estate. This inheritance was challenged by his cousin, who argued that the re-registration was invalid; under this interpretation, Forbes would legally be considered a woman, and thus unable to inherit the baronetcy. The legal position was unclear, and it took three years before a ruling by the Court of Session, which held him to be intersex, finally led to the Home Secretary recognising his claim to the title. The case was heard in great secrecy, with the effect that it was unable to be considered in other judgments on the legal recognition of gender variance, but has become more widely known since his death in 1991.
Family background
The Forbeses were a well-established
John, the new Lord Sempill and Baronet, was a
The couple had four children. The eldest,
Finally, in 1912, a fourth child was born, christened Elizabeth Forbes-Sempill, and known to the family as "Betty".[5]
Early life
The issue of Ewan's gender would later prove contentious; the birth registration recorded a female child, but Forbes later commented that this was "a ghastly mistake".[6] Ewan was brought up as a girl alongside Margaret, but found childhood to be dominated by a growing gender insecurity.[5] In early childhood, his mother began to call him "Benjie", a name that persisted among family and friends well into his later life.[7] He spent a large amount of time playing with their cousins Patrick and David,[8] and routinely dressed as a boy.[9] In his book The Aul' Days, written many years later, Forbes recalled a hatred of being "made to dress up" for social engagements, and of going to great lengths to avoid them.[8]
Lord Sempill insisted on a "strict Scottish" upbringing for his children, which meant that he was taught to speak and write fluently in
As well as the harp, Forbes was an accomplished public reciter; in the summer of 1930, he won the Scots Verse recital contest at the
On the death of Lord Sempill in 1934, both the barony and the baronetcy passed to William, the eldest child. Forbes inherited an estate at Brux Castle, Aberdeenshire,[16] of about 1,300 acres (5.3 km2),[6] and enthusiastically took to the lifestyle of a laird, adopting a broad Doric accent and taking to wearing a masculine kilt.[5] He avoided upper-class society, where female clothing would be expected, and the last time he publicly appeared in a dress was to escort his mother to a royal garden party in 1935.[14]
Medical career
In 1939, Forbes was accepted as a medical student at the
The Alford area was one of the largest medical practices in Great Britain, and in the winter months Forbes often had to travel through ten-foot snowdrifts in a converted
On moving to Alford, Forbes had continued to present himself publicly as a man. In 1952, he formally became male by the simple process of requesting a warrant for birth re-registration from the
A month later, on 10 October, he married Isabella Mitchell, his housekeeper for the past five years, and formerly co-founder of his dance troupe.[21] The marriage took place at the kirk in Kildrummy, which he had recently joined.[22]
Inheritance and lawsuit
The re-registration passed without much public comment, and the issue of his gender would remain a private one until 1965. That December, his elder brother died, leaving daughters but no sons, and thus posing a problem of inheritance. The barony could be inherited by heirs male or female, and so passed directly to Sempill's eldest daughter Ann, but the baronetcy – along with the bulk of the land – would have to pass to the first male heir. The family had assumed that Ewan would inherit, as the younger brother. Following the death of the Lord Sempill in December 1965, The Times cited Debrett's in reporting that the heir to the baronetcy was the Hon. Ewan Forbes-Sempill, "formerly registered as Elizabeth".[23] However, this was challenged by his cousin John Forbes-Sempill,[24] who argued that the 1952 re-registration was invalid. This would mean that Forbes was still legally considered a woman, unable to inherit the title, and so it would pass to John Forbes-Sempill.[5]
At the time, gender re-registration was permitted in a limited set of cases; the leading case, decided in 1965, had held that re-registration of this form was only permitted when "the sex of a child was indeterminate at birth and it was later discovered ... that an error had been made". The challenge was taken to the Court of Session, where the case was heard in great secrecy by a single judge, Lord Hunter – no papers were publicly filed, and the judge sat in a solicitor's office rather than in open court to hear the case.[25] A total of twelve medical experts were called to give evidence.[26] Among the experts, Professor Martin Roth observed in evidence that he felt Forbes' condition was closer to that of a transsexual, and Professor John Strong described the medical tests involved as "not wholly conclusive".[27] Professor Louis Gooren returned to his records of the case in 1999 and "concluded, with hindsight, that Forbes-Sempill was almost certainly a female-to-male transsexual";[28] the details that have since emerged of his treatment make it clear that he was a trans man.[29]
The judge's ruling was that "as a matter of probability, the second petitioner [Ewan Forbes-Sempill] is a ... hermaphrodite"[30] according with the legal requirement of "indeterminate at birth". It has been suggested that the judge desired to ensure the estate and the title was inherited by the "right" candidate, and was flexible with his judgement to obtain this result.[31] The ruling continued to be challenged by John Forbes-Sempill, who caused it to be referred to the Home Secretary, James Callaghan, as the person responsible for the Roll of the Baronetage. Callaghan consulted the Lord Advocate, and finally declared in December 1968 that Ewan should be entered on the Roll as the rightful holder of the title.[32]
The level of secrecy of the case, which was criticised by some contemporary observers, meant that it was not properly recorded or published, and the exact facts of the argument were not known for some time. As a result, whilst it sharply differs from later rulings such as Corbett v Corbett (1970), it was not able to be considered as precedent in later judgments on the legal recognition of gender variance.[25] The records of the case were finally made available via the National Archives of Scotland in 1991, with additional documents released in 1994 after an appeal to the Home Secretary.[26][33] However, further release of records was limited, with the Lord Advocate's office stating that disclosing the files "would not be appropriate",[34] and the case would not be fully publicly documented until 2021.[34]
Later life
On taking up the baronetcy, Forbes dropped Sempill from his surname; this had been adopted by the family in the 1880s when it inherited the barony, and there was no reason to persist once the titles were separated.[16]
With the inheritance case settled, he left the public eye and returned to the life of a rural landowner, continuing to live in his house at Brux.
Forbes died in 1991, leaving no children, and was succeeded in the baronetcy by his cousin John, the relative who had made the legal challenge in the 1960s.[5] His widow, Isabella, died in 2002.[21]
Legacy
In 2021, Zoë Playdon published a book about Forbes,
Notes
- ^ a b c d Burke's, p. 1082.
- ^ "Obituary of William Forbes-Sempill". The Times. 22 July 1905. p. 5.
- ^ a b Forbes, p. 5.
- ^ Forbes, p. 1.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Obituary in The Daily Telegraph dated 1 October 1991, reprinted in the Daily Telegraph Book of Obituaries, ed. Hugh Massingberd, 1995.
- ^ a b c d "Isabella, Lady Forbes". The Telegraph. 2 March 2002. Archived from the original on 21 April 2013. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
- ^ a b c d Playdon 2021, ch. 1.
- ^ a b Forbes, p. 31.
- ^ Playdon 2021, ch. 1. A number of pictures are in his memoir.
- ^ Forbes, p. 6.
- ^ a b Forbes, p. 19.
- ^ Forbes, p. 44.
- ^ Forbes, p. 54.
- ^ a b Playdon 2021, ch. 2.
- ^ a b Forbes, p. 50.
- ^ a b c d Forbes, p. 11.
- ^ Forbes, p. 79.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-19-954089-1. Archived from the original on 4 April 2021. Retrieved 4 April 2021.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link - ^ Forbes, p. 88.
- ^ Forbes, p. 68. Note, however, that Who's Who gives his retirement from medical work as 1955.
- ^ a b Casely, Gordon (5 March 2002). "Obituary: Isabella, Lady Forbes of Craigievar". The Scotsman. p. 15.
- ^ a b Forbes, p. 65.
- ^ "Baronetcy Heir Once a Woman". The Times. 31 December 1965. p. 10.
- ^ John was the only son of Rear-Admiral Arthur Forbes-Sempill, the younger brother of Forbes's father; he was thus the next male heir, as neither of Lord Sempill's sisters had male children.
- ^ a b Playdon, Zoe-Jane (1996). "The Case of Ewan Forbes". Press for Change. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
- ^ a b Barnes, p. 166. The papers are reported as being held under reference CS258/1991/P892.
- ^ Barnes, p. 170.
- ^ Barnes, p. 171, note 43.
- ^ Playdon, Zoë (May 2004). "The Case of Ewan Forbes". Polare. 57.
- ^ Barnes, p. 185.
- from the original on 3 April 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
- ^ Obituary in The Daily Telegraph; see also extract quoted in Playdon 1996. The exact process by which the dispute reached the Home Secretary is unclear.
- ^ "John Forbes-Sempill: Petition under the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1933: Respondent: Ewan Forbes-Sempill". National Records of Scotland. Archived from the original on 4 April 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
- ^ a b c Strudwick, Patrick (10 November 2021). "The secret court case 50 years ago that has robbed transgender people of their rights ever since". inews.co.uk. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
- ISBN 978-0-08-030409-0.
- ^ Ravindran, Manori (1 November 2021). "'Hidden Case of Ewan Forbes' Book, About Scottish Trans Pioneer, to Be Adapted by Synchronicity Films (Exclusive)". Variety. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
References
- Forbes, Ewan (1984). The Aul' Days. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. ISBN 0-08-032415-0.
- Barnes, Lesley-Anne (2007). "Gender Identity and Scottish Law: The Legal Response to Transsexuality". Edinburgh Law Review. 11 (2): 162–186. .
- Reitwiesner, William Addams. "Ancestry of Ewan Forbes". Retrieved 13 November 2008.
- Charles Mosley, ed. (1999). Burke's Peerage and Baronetage. Vol. 1 (106th ed.). Burke's Peerage. ISBN 2-940085-02-1.
- Playdon, Zoë (2021). The Hidden Case of Ewan Forbes: The Transgender Trial That Threatened to Upend the British Establishment. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN 9781526619136.