User contributions for 108.2.8.193

17 February 2010

• 18:5918:59, 17 February 2010 diff hist +44‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Rephrased source.
• 05:0905:09, 17 February 2010 diff hist +345‎ User talk:Ryūkotsusei/Archive 4 ‎ →‎What do you mean failed verification?: new section
• 03:1703:17, 17 February 2010 diff hist +6‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Break 1: Sales numbers are probably still wrong
• 03:1503:15, 17 February 2010 diff hist +588‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Added more information about dubious 29 million number.
• 02:4702:47, 17 February 2010 diff hist +997‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Break 1: Sales numbers are probably still wrong
• 02:4102:41, 17 February 2010 diff hist −29‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Portuguese ref contains 35 million wordwide number, and magazine scan is real...you're losing your neutral point of view at this point.
• 02:1102:11, 17 February 2010 diff hist −22‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Proper sources tagged already.
• 02:0802:08, 17 February 2010 diff hist −14‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Citation provided.

16 February 2010

• 20:2920:29, 16 February 2010 diff hist +66‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Added more notes about the ambiguous sales.
• 20:2720:27, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0‎ Sega Genesis ‎No edit summary
• 19:4619:46, 16 February 2010 diff hist +213‎ User talk:Anomie ‎ →‎About the edit on the MK2 sales number...
• 18:2618:26, 16 February 2010 diff hist +427‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Sales number is wrong
• 18:2318:23, 16 February 2010 diff hist +223‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Break 1: Sales numbers are probably still wrong
• 18:1818:18, 16 February 2010 diff hist +116‎ Sega Genesis ‎ Added 1994 magazine scan, removed RS from Majesco and TecToy, the news source is a reliable reference and has been used here for years.
• 18:1218:12, 16 February 2010 diff hist +88‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Break 1: Sales numbers are probably still wrong
• 18:1118:11, 16 February 2010 diff hist +238‎ Talk:Sega Genesis ‎ →‎Break 1: Sales numbers are probably still wrong