Talk:Sega Genesis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured topic candidate
Promoted
Current status: Featured article


Change Genesis 2 image to Genesis 1?

So I see that the photo of the Mega Drive is a model 1, but the Genesis is model 2? Is there a reason for this inconsistency? Should it be changed? MrNoobNub2 (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Treating this question as a follow-on from the topic above. By having the current combo we cover four different aspects of the console - Version 1 & 2 and Megadrive & Genesis. I don't see this as inconsistent, but rather as a neat way of showing the different markets and models with a minimum of image overload. Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. MrNoobNub2 (talk) 00:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not an "inconsistency" it's just showing a variety of scenarios. Sergecross73 msg me 22:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2024

I calculated the total number of copies sold for Sonic the hedgehog for the Sega mega drive and after figuring out the accurate total, I need to add it to this page. Sonicnut131 (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - This is not for asking for access for editing the article, it's for presenting information to be added, which will be reviewed by an experienced editor to see if it's appropriate for inclusion. Sergecross73 msg me 20:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Rosen did not coin the name "Genesis" (and in any case, a single self-assertion makes a poor reference.)

First: I have read the Title FAQ, I understand the rules and I am in no way suggesting the name be changed again. For what it's worth, I consider myself a neutral observer, having lived in both territories, having never owned a Sega console and with my interest limited to that of a historian. I feel obligated to state that the case given in the FAQ for the US/CA name is symptomatic of a much wider problem with Wikipedia - it is hopelessly US-centric, and the FAQ outlines a near-textbook case of justification of this US-centrality ex post facto with false assertions and spurious arguments. The use of a poll to decide the matter is decidedly the most onerous, and sorriest, chapter of this story, considering the US-centric nature of Wikipedia attracts US users and editors, dissuades those from the rest of the world, and creates a foregone result based not on opinion or expertise, but on self-perpetuating imbalance with a tinge of inviting a sort of national chauvinism. It is not my intent to be disruptive, but as an American living abroad, and having worked as a history teacher in the UK and Australia, I have encountered real-world consequences of this bias. Four out of the five schools at which I worked, across both countries, banned use of Wikipedia chiefly due to the often-absurd levels of US-centrism of both its content and editors. Two of those even blocked access to it from their networks due to frequent usage (and revert after revert to) US spelling on pages whose subjects were entirely based in Commonwealth countries. Proper prosecution of this US-centric folly belongs elsewhere, but I would note that the one argument for the US/CA name over the worldwide name that makes some sense - that US Sega fans recognise the worldwide name less frequently than Japanese, British, Australian, Brazilian (and so on) Sega fans recognise the US/CA name - has nothing to do with the appropriateness of either, but rather is deeply rooted in US people having far less awareness of what goes on in other countries than those countries' people have of what goes on outside their own borders. It is hardly an argument to pander to this phenomenon.

To get to the main point, the wiki takes David Rosen's assertion that he coined the name "Genesis" as fact, relying on a single claim by himself from a 1992 book. The alternative story about Mega Drive Systems - a California-based manufacturer of PC storage devices, particularly SCSI drives - seems convincing, but may be suspect - a YouTuber (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syeSrV9poJo ) searching out the copyright of this company could only trace it to 1991, though in my limited but not nonexistent understanding of US copyright law, this does not falsify the theory that it could have triggered the initial name change. However, the same source also details how the name "Genesis" - a replacement for the original idea for the US launch, "Tomahawk" - was invented not by David Rosen, but by an engineer at Atari during the brief period when Sega had approached Atari with an offer to release the Mega Drive in the US (and elsewhere) as an Atari console. Supposedly, the engineer won a steak dinner for all of his marketing nous. David Rosen's assertion that he invented the name, then, seems more likely than not to be little more than PR - remember the source for attributing the name to Rosen was a book published during the thick of the 16-bit console wars. I do not have the time to go digging to the depths required to find the attributable truth; apparently I spend that time instead railing against my country's unworldliness and ignorance. But I feel confident in suggesting that Rosen's claim should be removed from the article as unproven and contested at best. Khardankov (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So.... ignoring the fairly disruptive and unnecessary first paragraph of this... Do you have any reliable sources (
WP:RS) to backup a change to the article content? At best we might make it clearer that Rosen's claims are, in fact, just Rosen's claims. -- ferret (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Not really sure what the first paragraph has to do with any of this, but do you have any further sources on the matter? It appears you're asking us to delete something a reliable source said because of a claim from a YouTuber? That's not the sort of sourcing Wikipedia uses in general, let alone in a
Featured Article. Sergecross73 msg me 14:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The article doesn't say Rosen coined the name "Genesis". Instead it says In North America, the name was changed to "Genesis".
The only claim the article makes about Rosen on the name is this: Rosen said he insisted on the name as he disliked "Mega Drive" and wanted to represent "a new beginning" for Sega. It isn't written in Wikipedia's voice — it explicitly says that this is what Rosen said. Popcornfud (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Khardankov - so much wrong with everything you’ve said, and I say that as an American who actually supports the Mega Drive naming system but accepts what is because the content matters more than the name. In any regard, I don’t mean to be rude, but let me see if I can help fill in some gaps for you:
  • A “poll” is not the true reason this article is at Sega Genesis and not Mega Drive. It’s Wikipedia policy,
    WP:TITLECHANGES
    . Because there is actually no consensus on which is correct, and likely never will be, per the policy we default to the title the article was at when it was no longer a stub, and that’s Sega Genesis. That is pretty clearly spelled out in the FAQ.
  • The entire second paragraph smells of
    WP:VNT
    as good recommended reading.
In other words, show me the sources first, ones that are reliable. Red Phoenix talk 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources on discontinuation date

Can anyone share a source for the Genesis being discontinued in Brazil in 2023, because i couldn't find any and i doubt that claim. Rvtar34 (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can go to the Tectoy website and see that they no longer sell it, Just an Atari Flashback, a Master System variant with games, and an Arcade based console.
https://www.tectoy.com.br/games/consoles
There's a thread on reddit mentioning it here https://www.reddit.com/r/SEGAGENESIS/comments/1434d2a/sega_genesis_is_officially_discontinued_in_brazil/ Lmcgregoruk (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None of that is useable for Wikipedia unfortunately. Popcornfud (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention, if I’m not mistaken, that it’s happened before and been brought back — in the case of Genesis, at least. Master System has had better longevity with Tectoy than Genesis has. Red Phoenix talk 17:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sega_Genesis&oldid=1210857379"