User contributions for 71.202.210.61

13 April 2016

• 22:1622:16, 13 April 2016 diff hist −10‎ Look-and-say sequence ‎ Excessive use of "then"

2 October 2015

• 20:5520:55, 2 October 2015 diff hist −49‎ Fine-structure constant ‎ →‎Numerological explanations

20 October 2013

• 23:4023:40, 20 October 2013 diff hist +2,026‎ Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement ‎ →‎Statement by 198.189.184.243
• 23:2523:25, 20 October 2013 diff hist +8,772‎ Rupert Sheldrake ‎ justification for sources previously given, specific citation from Durr is * suggest possibility of integration<ref name="Durrperspective"/> - remember, we don't want to provide misconceptions, leading to libel problems, as Sheldrake has alluded to
• 23:1423:14, 20 October 2013 diff hist +1,384‎ Talk:Séralini affair ‎ →‎notability of other sources
• 10:3510:35, 20 October 2013 diff hist +19‎ Rupert Sheldrake ‎ minor fix - remember, edit maintains an npov giving weight to critics, cites notable sources like JCS - as it stands, it is a way to avoid libel suits for "defamation": http://sciencesetfree.tumblr.com/post/63184238054/wikipedia-under-threat
• 10:1510:15, 20 October 2013 diff hist +8,808‎ Rupert Sheldrake ‎ edit maintains an npov giving weight to critics, cites notable sources like JCS and other notable sources- as it stands, it is a way to avoid libel suits for "defamation": http://sciencesetfree.tumblr.com/post/63184238054/wikipedia-under-threat
• 09:4409:44, 20 October 2013 diff hist +8,799‎ Rupert Sheldrake ‎ updated with NPOV, allowing notable non-critical items, to avoid the possibility of a libel suit from Sheldrake, who has called the article "defamatory": http://sciencesetfree.tumblr.com/post/63184238054/wikipedia-under-threat
• 09:3409:34, 20 October 2013 diff hist +19‎ Wikipedia:Sandbox ‎No edit summary

14 September 2013

• 06:1106:11, 14 September 2013 diff hist +363‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Scientific community rejects him, not just a few scientists
• 05:5705:57, 14 September 2013 diff hist +872‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Scientific community rejects him, not just a few scientists

13 September 2013

• 23:0723:07, 13 September 2013 diff hist +98‎ Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Talk:Orthomolecular medicine (again)
• 22:3222:32, 13 September 2013 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Concerns with article
• 20:5820:58, 13 September 2013 diff hist +128‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Concerns with article
• 20:5120:51, 13 September 2013 diff hist +319‎ User talk:Manul ‎ →‎Your concerns about Rupert Sheldrake: new section
• 19:2219:22, 13 September 2013 diff hist +319‎ User talk:Barney the barney barney ‎ →‎Your concerns about Rupert Sheldrake: new section
• 19:1819:18, 13 September 2013 diff hist +280‎ Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Rupert Sheldrake (yet again)
• 18:5918:59, 13 September 2013 diff hist −5,234‎ Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Talk:Orthomolecular medicine (again)
• 06:4706:47, 13 September 2013 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Concerns with article
• 06:4406:44, 13 September 2013 diff hist −163‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Concerns with article
• 06:4006:40, 13 September 2013 diff hist +10,518‎ Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ →‎Concerns with article: new section
• 01:0901:09, 13 September 2013 diff hist +2‎ Wikipedia:Sandbox ‎No edit summary

2 August 2013

• 19:1219:12, 2 August 2013 diff hist −25‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary
• 18:5218:52, 2 August 2013 diff hist +21‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary
• 18:4918:49, 2 August 2013 diff hist −21‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary
• 18:4018:40, 2 August 2013 diff hist −6‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary
• 18:2518:25, 2 August 2013 diff hist +8‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary
• 18:2018:20, 2 August 2013 diff hist +3,896‎ Linus Pauling ‎No edit summary