User contributions for Angusf27
A user with 56 edits. Account created on 15 December 2008.
22 February 2010
- 07:3407:34, 22 February 2010 diff hist 0 Stevia No edit summary
- 07:3307:33, 22 February 2010 diff hist +12 Stevia No edit summary
- 07:3207:32, 22 February 2010 diff hist +490 Stevia No edit summary
21 February 2010
- 22:2122:21, 21 February 2010 diff hist +108 Rose of Lima No edit summary
- 22:1422:14, 21 February 2010 diff hist +12 Rose of Lima →Veneration
- 22:1322:13, 21 February 2010 diff hist +90 Rose of Lima →Veneration
6 October 2009
- 07:4007:40, 6 October 2009 diff hist −42 Wikipedia:Help desk No edit summary
- 07:3807:38, 6 October 2009 diff hist +610 Wikipedia:Help desk →[Ticket#2009092110025204] Header notifications of article: new section
24 September 2009
- 13:2313:23, 24 September 2009 diff hist +69 Talk:PureCircle No edit summary
- 13:2213:22, 24 September 2009
diff hist +304 N
Talk:PureCircle
←Created page with 'I'm not sure I see what the problem is with this article. The article content is pretty neutral as other company's wikipedia page. There are all facts that can be f...'
22 September 2009
- 10:3410:34, 22 September 2009 diff hist +1,051 PureCircle No edit summary
18 September 2009
- 09:2909:29, 18 September 2009 diff hist +83 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
- 09:2309:23, 18 September 2009 diff hist −86 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
14 September 2009
- 08:2808:28, 14 September 2009 diff hist +106 PureCircle No edit summary
- 08:2708:27, 14 September 2009 diff hist +141 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
11 September 2009
- 15:2815:28, 11 September 2009 diff hist +9 m PureCircle No edit summary
- 15:2715:27, 11 September 2009 diff hist −12 PureCircle No edit summary
- 12:0812:08, 11 September 2009 diff hist +5,698 N PureCircle |indu...'
10 September 2009
- 18:0918:09, 10 September 2009 diff hist +525 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
- 18:0618:06, 10 September 2009 diff hist +8 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
- 18:0318:03, 10 September 2009 diff hist 0 User:Angusf27 →Awards
- 18:0218:02, 10 September 2009 diff hist −79 User:Angusf27 →Awards
- 12:0612:06, 10 September 2009 diff hist +761 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
9 September 2009
- 19:0119:01, 9 September 2009 diff hist +1 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
- 18:5818:58, 9 September 2009 diff hist 0 User:Angusf27 No edit summary
- 14:3914:39, 9 September 2009 diff hist +4,482 N User:Angusf27 |indu...'
17 July 2009
- 09:0909:09, 17 July 2009 diff hist −3 Stevia every regulatory submission has supporters and proponents. Stevia has been no more or less controversial than other ingredient submissions and to discrib
- 09:0509:05, 17 July 2009 diff hist −608 Stevia Removed Blue California material which was out of date and a commercial promotion
25 June 2009
- 12:5312:53, 25 June 2009 diff hist 0 Dempsey and Makepeace No edit summary
18 June 2009
- 13:0213:02, 18 June 2009 diff hist +1,016 Talk:Stevia →Promotional edit warring
17 June 2009
- 13:4713:47, 17 June 2009 diff hist +89 Stevia ' second tier supplier??? " Either commercial references are accurate or not included but DEFINATELY not skewed in favor of a a commercial agenda of an editor. WP:UNDUE
- 13:4013:40, 17 June 2009 diff hist +379 Talk:Stevia →Promotional edit warring
16 June 2009
- 09:1509:15, 16 June 2009 diff hist +21 Stevia There are many trade names and wiki is not an ad space for Cargill. Undue Commercial Influence.
- 09:0609:06, 16 June 2009 diff hist +68 m Stevia Tidied up first paragraph content restoring commercial balance.
30 May 2009
- 09:4609:46, 30 May 2009 diff hist +10 Stevia As per many previous, restoring commercial balance away from Cargill version to achieve balance and fairness. Otherwise we will go stright to Wikipedia arbitration as undue commercial influence.
14 April 2009
- 13:3913:39, 14 April 2009 diff hist −20 Stevia a web blog is not a credible source and Reb A is extracted naturally ref: www.purecircle.com
- 13:3313:33, 14 April 2009 diff hist +7 Steviol glycoside →Availability
- 13:3213:32, 14 April 2009 diff hist +254 Steviol glycoside Rebiana is one of many trade names, therefore for balance changed 'the' to 'a'. Clarified PureVia data
13 March 2009
- 09:4109:41, 13 March 2009 diff hist 0 m Stevia Removed a hypen as per proposed USP Monograph and common usage
- 09:3109:31, 13 March 2009 diff hist +1 m Stevia Changed inaccurate description of Reb A as ' chemically extracted ' it is not.
6 January 2009
- 17:2317:23, 6 January 2009 diff hist +1,180 Talk:Stevia →Promotional edit warring
- 17:2217:22, 6 January 2009 diff hist +1,179 Talk:Stevia →Promotional edit warring
- 17:0717:07, 6 January 2009 diff hist +261 Stevia Will happily engage in balanced discussion and provide endless thrird party references as soon as I am at computer
3 January 2009
- 09:0009:00, 3 January 2009 diff hist −1,015 Stevia Happy to and reverted to balanced text meanwhile.
2 January 2009
- 20:3420:34, 2 January 2009 diff hist −1,063 Stevia Previous version reads like an unbalanced ad for Coke/Cargill. I can provide extensive balanced alternative sources. Looks like we have to go to an unbaised third party on this one.
31 December 2008
- 16:3916:39, 31 December 2008 diff hist −1,063 Stevia Yet again had to commercially and fairly rebalance ie too many repetitious references for Coke/Cargill and one whole line for their major competition
22 December 2008
- 12:3212:32, 22 December 2008 diff hist +4 m Stevia How can we collaberate to stop us endlessly re editing each other's commercial viewpoints?Regards Angus
- 07:5407:54, 22 December 2008 diff hist −1,078 Stevia please stop promoting cargill/coke
21 December 2008
- 11:2711:27, 21 December 2008 diff hist +8 m Stevia More neutral language. Previous reversion fairly reflects global coverage. Happy to substantiate with proof.
- 11:2411:24, 21 December 2008 diff hist −1,323 Stevia )
