User contributions for LogicalLeaf129

Results for LogicalLeaf129 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 148 edits. Account created on 16 July 2024.

This account is currently partially blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 July 2025

8 July 2025

7 July 2025

  • 22:3522:35, 7 July 2025 diff hist +449 Sterling, Virginia Undid revision: That’s incorrect. Per WP:AGF and WP:BRD, good-faith content DOES NOT require prior consensus to be added or remain ONLY actual POLICY-BASED objections justify removal. Your subjective opinion of the map as “terrible” is not grounds for deletion. Per WP:PRESERVE and WP:IMAGEQUALITY, content should be improved or discussed before deletion, not removed unilaterally. This aligns with WP:CONSENSUS, which requires collaborative resolution attempts before deletion not personal judgment.
    Undo Disambiguation links
    added
  • 22:2822:28, 7 July 2025 diff hist +77 Springfield, Virginia Undid revision: “Absolutely terrible” is a subjective opinion, not a valid reason for removal. Per WP:PRESERVE and WP:IMAGEQUALITY. Clear violation of WP:EditWarring
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 22:2422:24, 7 July 2025 diff hist +73 Reston, Virginia Undid revision: “Rm poor map” is not a valid justification for deleting good-faith content. Per WP:AGF, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:BRD, removal of content especially good-faith content requires a clear, POLICY-BASED rationale (which you never provided) and should be preceded by talk page discussion if disputed. If there are specific concerns with the map, they should be addressed in discussion or talk page , not removed outright without explanation grounded in WP:NPOV, WP:V, or MOS:IMAGEQUALITY.
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 22:2122:21, 7 July 2025 diff hist +135 Manassas, Virginia Undid revision: “Edit warring” doesn’t apply when I’m defending good-faith edits that have not been shown to violate any policy. Per WP:AGF, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:BRD, content should be discussed or improved not repeatedly deleted without POLICY-BACKED consensus which no "seasoned editor" has yet to do . If three editors remove sourced content without citing a single policy, that’s not consensus , that’s coordinated disruption.
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 22:1522:15, 7 July 2025 diff hist +758 User talk:LogicalLeaf129 →Continued edit warring: Reply Tag: Reply
  • 02:2902:29, 7 July 2025 diff hist −973 m Chantilly, Virginia update information / structural fixes
  • 02:2002:20, 7 July 2025 diff hist +449 m Sterling, Virginia Undid revision: Good-faith edits especially those restoring previously present content do not require prior consensus to remain. Per WP:AGF and WP:PRESERVE, only removal of content demands consensus SUPPORTED BY POLICY. “No consensus for inclusion” does not apply to edits being reinstated that contain material added in good faith.
    Undo Reverted Disambiguation links
    added
  • 02:1702:17, 7 July 2025 diff hist +77 m Springfield, Virginia Undid revision: This was a good-faith edit, and no specific policy has been cited to justify its removal. Per WP:AGF and WP:BRD, content added in good faith should not be removed without discussion and valid policy reasoning. A vague claim of "low quality" is not sufficient under MOS:IMAGEQUALITY, especially when the image is legible, relevant, and accurate. If improvements are needed, they should be discussed or made per WP:PRESERVE, not removed outright. (User:Magnolia677 IO WP:EW 3/3)
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 02:1202:12, 7 July 2025 diff hist +2,758 m Reston, Virginia Undid revision:Removing over 1,200 characters without prior discussion goes against WP:PRESERVE and WP:BRD. Good-faith content should not be deleted wholesale; concerns about sourcing should be addressed by tagging or discussion first. Until consensus or policy issues are clear, the content should remain. (User:Magnolia677 IO WP:EW 2/3)
    Undo
  • 02:0802:08, 7 July 2025 diff hist +135 m Manassas, Virginia Undid revision:WP:ONUS applies when content is disputed on policy grounds, which hasn’t happened here. Good-faith content already present doesn’t require consensus to remain removal does, per WP:AGF and WP:PRESERVE. No policy has been cited to justify deletion. Please respond on talk page for cooperative resolution and avoid WP:EW
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 02:0502:05, 7 July 2025 diff hist +127 m Fredericksburg, Virginia Undid revision: This was a good-faith edit, and no specific policy has been cited to justify its removal. Per WP:AGF and WP:BRD, content added in good faith should not be removed without discussion and valid policy reasoning. A vague claim of "low quality" is not sufficient under MOS:IMAGEQUALITY, especially when the image is legible, relevant, and accurate. If improvements are needed, they should be discussed or made per WP:PRESERVE, not removed outright. (User:Magnolia677 EW Complain IO 1/3)
    Undo
     Reverted
  • 02:0102:01, 7 July 2025 diff hist +1,672 User talk:LogicalLeaf129 →Continued edit warring: Reply Tag: Reply
  • 01:5201:52, 7 July 2025 diff hist −939 m Chantilly, Virginia update information / structural fixes Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added
  • 01:0101:01, 7 July 2025 diff hist −343 m Ashburn, Virginia update information / structural fixes current

6 July 2025

5 July 2025

  • 04:5504:55, 5 July 2025 diff hist +135 m Manassas, Virginia Undid revision This map supports the etymology and postal code layout section by illustrating how named communities in Western Prince William County overlap and interact geographically. Under WP:EDUSE, educational value justifies inclusion. The claim of “low quality” is subjective and unsupported; the map is legible, informative, and provides visual context not available in official ZIP code maps. No suitable free alternative exists. Restoration is appropriate.
    Undo
     Reverted

3 July 2025

2 July 2025

15 June 2025

14 June 2025

13 June 2025

  • 22:5422:54, 13 June 2025 diff hist +791 Sterling, Virginia Reverting per WP:BRD , WP:CONCENSUS , AND WP: ONUS - unjust large scale removal , User:Magnolia677 has not responded to discussion on talk page or provided any policy justification. Discussion is needed for deletion of large scale information. Discuss on talk page Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added
  • 16:5516:55, 13 June 2025 diff hist +1,622 Talk:Sterling, Virginia Unable to edit on his talk page , official warning for edit war report needed
  • 16:5416:54, 13 June 2025 diff hist +1,063 Sterling, Virginia Magnolia677 please refrain from destructive edits , Restoring edits per ongoing Talk page discussion; content is supported by WP:RS, reflects WP:NPOV and WP:LOCAL, and does not violate WP:OR. Removal without concluded collaborative discussion goes against WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD. You have yet to respond to our conversation on the Sterling talk page and have proceeded to continue wholesale deletion as seen by the edit history, your actions go against WP:EW. Thanks for understanding ! (FYI: Wiki p Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added

4 June 2025

3 June 2025

2 June 2025

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/LogicalLeaf129"