Talk:Sterling, Virginia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

To the person that corrected me about SVRS being part-volunteer: Not true, I am a member, we are 100% volunteer staffed. We have no professional staff whatsoever, day or nite. Radix99 15:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Loudoun Seal.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 19:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 15:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sterling, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed

I'm not sure how to do edits on citations. There is a "citation needed" where it mentions that Sterling was a whites-only community. Here is its source:

http://www.loudounhistory.org/history/sterling-park-beginnngs-1961.htm

Can someone add that and remove this comment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.66.227 (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. The whole section is taken almost verbatim from the loudounhistory.org source, needs to be rewritten.Fishlandia (talk) 14:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

need RS for Greater Sterling designation by USPS

As used in a recent edit, the term Greater Sterling requires a

TEDickey (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

@Famartin: See OP post. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 23:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the text of the edit makes it clear that the USPS identifies a much larger area as “Sterling”, which flows into common usage because of that. “Greater Sterling” isn’t a common term, just convenient for distinguishing between what the public thinks of as “Sterling” (which is based on mailing addresses) versus what the Census Bureau considers to be “Sterling”. Whatever the preferred wording might be, I feel this is a distinction which absolutely must be made. Famartin (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But you're attributing it to a specific, well-known entity. Time to read

TEDickey (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Seems that replacing "Greater Sterling" with "Sterling postal" maintains the distinction between CDP and Postal regions while avoiding the suggestion that "Greater Sterling" is a postal area. Jcurious (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's only part of the edit. The text states that Herndon is the preferred address per authority of USPS:

A much wider region has a preferred mailing address of Sterling, Virginia per the United States Post Office.

There's not much that's reusable in the edit.

TEDickey (talk
) 01:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC) USPS has a page for lookup by zip-code, and advises there [reply]

For more rapid delivery, please use the recommended or recognized city names whenever possible for this ZIP Code

which may be misconstrued as preferred (though if you consult a dictionary they're not synonyms). What it's telling you is that for unincorporated areas where there's no post office, they recommend routing through the post office which serves that area, but that when it has a generally recognized name, they'll deliver it anyway using the recognized name(s). There are a lot of areas for which this advice applies, and USPS (lacking a

TEDickey (talk) 02:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Koppen Climate "winter" weather classification is incorrect for Northern Virginia (Incorrect for many other regions too)

The Koppen Climate classification describes Northern Virginia winters as "mild to cool". This is incorrect. A large percentage of winter days are quite cold, a large percentage are "cool" and only a small percentage are mild. The KCC is correct for summer weather in this area.

There have been many complaints made about the Koppen Climate classification being incorrect for many regions-- see it's Wikipedia article Talk Page. This article should use

NOAA
weather data instead. It is much more accurate for Northern Virginia. The area does have hot sub-tropical summers, but in the winter Mid-Atlantic, not southern, weather patterns take over. Cool to cold is the rule.

I suggest that the article use

NOAA
data and drop the incorrect Koppen Climate classification. NOTE: The KCC has complaints about it in many regions as being innacurate. It is a very old system and depending on the KCC described region, can be innacuate for at least some seasons.

Chesapeake77 >>> Truth 14:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]