User contributions for Sbyrnes321

18 January 2024

• 16:3916:39, 18 January 2024 diff hist +474‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ →‎How to Cite Your Shockley Queisser Curve: Reply Tag: Reply

13 January 2024

• 14:1714:17, 13 January 2024 diff hist +604‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Wigner Energy: reply - I think that's not enough energy to be relevant in this context

21 April 2023

• 14:5514:55, 21 April 2023 diff hist +29‎ Dorsal raphe nucleus ‎ make terminology consistent with the page title: "nucleus raphes dorsalis" → "dorsal raphe nucleus"

28 January 2023

• 20:2820:28, 28 January 2023 diff hist −9‎ The Dawn of Everything ‎ fix broken link and broken URL

5 December 2022

• 01:5601:56, 5 December 2022 diff hist −2,081‎ m User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ Undid revision 1124451078 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) OK
  Undo

23 November 2022

• 02:1302:13, 23 November 2022 diff hist +474‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Effective Altruism ‎ →‎Citing EA Forum posts that are now listed on Google Scholar: I don't think google scholar means anything

3 October 2022

• 02:3002:30, 3 October 2022 diff hist +34‎ Mammillary body ‎ replace dead link to paper PDF with a working one

22 September 2022

• 13:3513:35, 22 September 2022 diff hist +210‎ Neurohypophysial hormone ‎ add two more, also mention some animals that have lost this hormone

18 August 2022

• 13:2213:22, 18 August 2022 diff hist +551‎ Pituitary gland ‎ fix first sentence (size of a chickpea, not pea) and add supporting citation and quote

4 August 2022

• 18:5018:50, 4 August 2022 diff hist +47‎ Pain asymbolia ‎ wikilink morphine & analgesia, see also Congenital insensitivity to pain

3 July 2022

• 17:2517:25, 3 July 2022 diff hist −37‎ Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3 ‎ →‎Polar vector: sign

17 May 2022

• 14:4514:45, 17 May 2022 diff hist −375‎ Cold fusion ‎ Undid revision 1087852437 by Brian Josephson (talk) seems insufficiently relevant for the lede section (could go in the "conferences" section). It was just an exploratory workshop, it reached no conclusions, and it seems nothing came of it. Whereas the other things in that paragraph are panel reports reaching conclusions about LENR.
  Undo
  Reverted

24 March 2022

• 13:0413:04, 24 March 2022 diff hist +78‎ m User:Sbyrnes321 ‎No edit summary current

25 February 2022

• 21:0821:08, 25 February 2022 diff hist +107‎ Outer loop ‎ add computer programming usage

6 January 2022

• 16:4716:47, 6 January 2022 diff hist +776‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ →‎Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Animation.: reply

4 December 2021

• 01:3001:30, 4 December 2021 diff hist +386‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Effective Altruism ‎ →‎Assessing page quality: ratings are often bad I think

1 December 2021

• 13:4813:48, 1 December 2021 diff hist +139‎ Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Effective Altruism ‎ →‎Support: +1
• 01:3801:38, 1 December 2021 diff hist −2,007‎ m User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ Undid revision 1056646455 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
  Undo

18 November 2021

• 02:0902:09, 18 November 2021 diff hist +586‎ Talk:Instrumental convergence ‎ →‎Paperclip maximizer author: add Sam Harris quote

14 July 2021

• 02:0602:06, 14 July 2021 diff hist +3‎ AI alignment ‎ Undid revision 1032710503 by Junya 77 (talk) "utility" may confuse people into thinking that this is related to utility functions. "Usefulness" doesn't have that problem, and is understandable and accurate.
  Undo

17 May 2021

• 21:1821:18, 17 May 2021 diff hist 0‎ AI takeover ‎ Undid revision 1023484696 by 103.161.98.0 (talk)
  Undo

6 May 2021

• 12:5312:53, 6 May 2021 diff hist +414‎ Talk:Superintelligence ‎ →‎What do we do with Kshitij Gautam's (08:18, 5 May 2021‎ Motocrox) edit?: roll it back

22 April 2021

• 17:5817:58, 22 April 2021 diff hist +58‎ Pedunculopontine nucleus ‎ →‎Projections: make sentence more readable without changing the meaning. (Didn't check the sources.)

1 April 2021

• 15:5415:54, 1 April 2021 diff hist −10‎ Cold fusion ‎ I don't see support for the claim that there is a "revival" of interest (in the sense that, say, world investment in CF is higher right now than 5 or 10 years ago). Some new projects have started, some old projects have stopped, how do we know the total went up? Also, the Nature citation clearly states that it was a failed replication, and this is stated elsewhere in this article.

9 January 2021

• 03:5503:55, 9 January 2021 diff hist −62‎ m Superintelligence ‎ Reverted 1 edit by 1.132.107.78 (talk) to last revision by Smeagol 17
  Undo

24 November 2020

• 16:4616:46, 24 November 2020 diff hist +958‎ Talk:Existential risk from artificial general intelligence ‎ →‎Possible scenario edit: scenarios for pedagogy vs scenarios for consideration
• 16:3116:31, 24 November 2020 diff hist −1,987‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ Undid revision 990323756 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) OK thanks
  Undo

19 November 2020

• 19:4219:42, 19 November 2020 diff hist −10,690‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ move stuff to archive
• 19:4219:42, 19 November 2020 diff hist +8,717‎ N User talk:Sbyrnes321/Archives/2019 ‎ move stuff to archive current
• 19:4019:40, 19 November 2020 diff hist +481‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ →‎What is the production process for your images?: reply

13 November 2020

• 17:5917:59, 13 November 2020 diff hist +191‎ SCLS ‎ add Service Contract Labor Standards current

27 October 2020

• 13:3513:35, 27 October 2020 diff hist +457‎ Talk:Bloch's theorem ‎ →‎Small mistake : wrong image in the "Applications and consequences" section: reply

6 October 2020

• 23:3623:36, 6 October 2020 diff hist +192‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎NASA Lattice Confinement Fusion.: maybe could go into colliding beam fusion

1 October 2020

• 19:3919:39, 1 October 2020 diff hist −1,654‎ m User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ delete old spam
• 19:3619:36, 1 October 2020 diff hist +24‎ m User:Sbyrnes321 ‎ tweak bio

6 June 2020

• 11:0111:01, 6 June 2020 diff hist +21‎ Koniocellular cell ‎ →‎Output: fix wrong link

17 May 2020

• 20:1320:13, 17 May 2020 diff hist +1,012‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Report of the explosion, again: add Nathan Lewis quote

29 March 2020

• 13:0113:01, 29 March 2020 diff hist +202‎ User talk:Sbyrnes321 ‎ →‎Suggestion for contribution to Density Matrix page

26 March 2020

• 01:0501:05, 26 March 2020 diff hist +884‎ Talk:Artificial general intelligence ‎ →‎Speculation: reply to Bernd

19 March 2020

• 13:1113:11, 19 March 2020 diff hist +862‎ Talk:Artificial general intelligence ‎ →‎Speculation: agree with Rolf

7 March 2020

• 19:4419:44, 7 March 2020 diff hist +768‎ Talk:Artificial general intelligence ‎ →‎Speculation: "hypothetical" might be better?

10 August 2019

• 17:0317:03, 10 August 2019 diff hist +50‎ Existential risk from artificial general intelligence ‎ fix misleading suggestion that "resist[ing] attempts to shut it off or change its goals" is something that happens primarily because of the programming in of human values

16 May 2019

• 00:5100:51, 16 May 2019 diff hist +400‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics ‎ →‎"Conductive" redirect: I like the status quo

19 April 2019

• 18:0918:09, 19 April 2019 diff hist +51‎ TMA ‎
  Three mirror anastigmat

15 April 2019

• 14:3814:38, 15 April 2019 diff hist +150‎ Talk:Existential risk from artificial general intelligence ‎
  WP:ENGVAR

13 April 2019

• 20:0820:08, 13 April 2019 diff hist +2‎ m AlphaZero ‎ typos

3 April 2019

• 19:2219:22, 3 April 2019 diff hist 0‎ Ampère's force law ‎ Reverted
  TW
  )
  Undo

2 April 2019

• 17:2117:21, 2 April 2019 diff hist +319‎ Talk:Heiligenschein ‎ →‎Merge with Opposition effect?: clarify difference
• 17:2117:21, 2 April 2019 diff hist +319‎ Talk:Opposition surge ‎ →‎Should it be merged with Heiligenschein?: clarify difference
• 17:1917:19, 2 April 2019 diff hist −1,231‎ Heiligenschein ‎ the organization seems to be that this article is just about the dewdrop cause, and everything else is covered in opposition surge. Therefore I deleted off-topic discussion and picture.