User talk:Kavyansh.Singh: Difference between revisions

"Peaceful discussion"

Hello:

Not to be picky, but I broke the lede of "Daisy" into four paragraphs for a reason. Generally the lede in a WP article is four paragraphs long. More importantly, the paragraph deals with two related but different subjects. That's why I made the commercial's content s separate paragraph. I'm surprised no one picked up on this when the article was reviewed for GA and now FA. Just so you know. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist – Oh, sure. I have made the change, and regardless, thanks a lot for your help with the article, much appreciated. The article looks much better that its initial version. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Good luck! Do let me know how it goes.Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist – It passed FA! Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Sing Congratulations!! That's a real accomplishment. Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty cool tool, and I've never seen it used before. Works for me, too, but I don't know a quick link to this tool. Doesn't seem to be in my "Tools" sidebar. Is there a quick access to this somewhere? — Maile (talk) 13:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a friendly heads up, WP:ISBN advises against converting 10-digit ISBNS to 13-digit ISBNs, unless the 13-digit ISBN appears in the original work. As it says, "if an older work only lists an ISBN-10, use that in citations instead of calculating an ISBN-13 for it. This is because ISBNs are often used as search strings and checksum differences between the two forms make it difficult to find items listed only under the other type." --Usernameunique (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernameunique – Yeah, I usually convert ISBN 10 to 13 only if there is inconsistency of its usage on the article. I somehow missed that on ‪William Chaney‬'s article, sorry for that. Re to @Maile66 – I don't know that if there's a quick access to this tool (can access by this link), but it is indeed easy and useful. Also, take care of the above point, which I usually miss.. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:JFK limousine.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

Congrats on the Triple Crown(s)! You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown|Imperial}}:

This user has been awarded an Imperial Triple Crown.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Damien Linnane – Thanks again! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of vice presidents of India by longevity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vice presidents of India by longevity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article

The article John Philip Sousa Baton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Philip Sousa Baton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

Just a note that this review page was deleted. New reviewer needed. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

Fine. Moved to support on the FP nomination page. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Electoral history of Bill Clinton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Electoral history of Bill Clinton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please do an image review for turtle? Thanks. LittleJerry (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LittleJerry – I am not a very experienced image reviewer, but I'll try. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article

The article Let Us Continue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Let Us Continue for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Draft Eisenhower movement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the famous campaign slogan "I Like Ike" was associated with the 1952 Draft Eisenhower movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Draft Eisenhower movement. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Draft Eisenhower movement), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kavyansh.Singh! Thanks for your hard work helping build the prep sets at DYK—it took me quite a bit to get the hang of it, so I hope you don't mind if I offer some advice as you go.

First, excellent job on balancing the prep sets (i'll be focusing on prep set 4 for this one)—four U.S. hooks and two biographies is within the current limits (the upper limits for both are 3 or 4 U.S. and/or bio hooks for prep set, but sometimes there will be extra limits that you can find on the talk page because we run shortages). The hooks are from diverse topics, the image is good—overall, awesome work! When building prep sets, you generally want to try to keep hooks from the same country apart—so you don't want two U.S. hooks next to each other, and you also don't want two bio hooks next to each other. Also, the nomination page is sorted in chronological order—so if you can pull hooks from closer to the top for a few, it helps the nominators who have been waiting for promotion for a while.

That's all I've got for now—I really appreciate your getting involved! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message at my talk page. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 16:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron – Thanks a lot for your note, I really appreciate it I really do!. Mechitzaing the hooks is something which I usually miss, but thanks for taking care of it. Will try to include more hooks from older nomination. Thanks for being kind enough to help! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that while it’s great to see more folks working DYK, I have over 60 DYK contributions and it’s kind of bad form to go in and make edits of someone’s hook beyond fixing typos and other very superficial tweaks. While I am willing to let the reviewer discuss whether a birth-death listing is appropriate, Earl Old Person died less than a week ago and they haven’t even held his funeral yet, so noting he died recently is going to be relevant. Montanabw^(talk) 22:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

good faith!. I'll surely leave it to the reviewer to decide whether birth-death listing is appropriate, but I do want to note that listing it as "1929–2021" isn't helpful. Till 2021 means from January 1 till the date when the hook would be on the main page. I guess, million of people died in those 10 months. Death of Earl Old Person may be notable, but his death in 2021 is not that notable, and that was the primary reason I removed it. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

It’s a debatable point. What’s notable was his longevity, both in office and that he was pretty active his entire life, hence the age note… maybe subtle, but I guess we’ll see. Thanks for your thoughts. Montanabw^(talk) 06:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 01:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article Robert M. La Follette you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert M. La Follette for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
		Thank you for your hard work getting Robert M. La Follette to GA! —JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 14:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]