User talk:LightKeyDarkBlade: Difference between revisions

Hello, LightKeyDarkBlade! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CMD (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Just a heads up here, so to make it clear: The visual editor takes in the parameters of each template as they are presented in the respective documentation, and as you can see at

Oh, I see. Sorry, I didn't know that visual editor would sort it in its way because I normally use source editor. I forgot that there are people who use visual editor and I thought it would be easier to edit in source editing when it's displayed the same way as the template. Sorry again for the trouble. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'm glad this is cleared up.

✉) 15:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Grand Budapest Hotel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheOldJacobite: Hi. I was simply updating the text in the infobox along with the citation from the same film entry on the British Board of Film Classification website. Or have I been mistaken and that it is not the same entry? Nonetheless, I have not removed any content at all, merely updating it. You shouldn't have reverted the change by accusing me of removing content. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LightKeyDarkBlade. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read Amiga. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing sourced information, As of Nov 10, 2019, Comscore has reported WW box office as $175,492,409 and reported that it was running in 13 Territories, In Box Office Mojo it has figures only from 9 Territories, So that extra amount comes from these not tracked territories, you have add them to reflect actual gross. Panda619 (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Sourced information"? I don't see that any of the values you give are in your "sources". And why only only specific weeks for the regions? You have no idea what you're doing. Haven't you read

MOS:FILM

.

What you're giving now is false information. You're adding the worldwide gross value (wherever you've obtained it from as it's not found in the citations) together with a few other territories to get a "total" worldwide gross. The 'worldwide gross' given by websites like Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, Comscore, etc is the TOTAL worldwide gross value, including the listed territories.

Moreover, if you want to revert changes, you NEVER revert immediately to a revision without considering other edits made in-between. That's basic Wikipedia procedure.

Anyhow, you're the one here with no sourced information. I'll be reverting the changes soon if you don't respond or if you can't give a convincing enough reason. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I noticed that you had edited the Ark page recently and I was wondering if you could possible add a section dedicated to the mobs. As in a list of mobs organized by DLC and mobs that come pre-DLC so that people can know what to actually expect when they purchase the game so they don’t get disappointed. Thanks! Antman2002 (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We're not supposed to put those things per

WP:GAMECRUFT. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 03:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

How come you won't accept that Virtua Fighter 5 is the final game in its franchise? The Virtua Fighter series hasn't had a new installment in 14 years. 172.250.44.165 (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How come you won't accept that this is Wikipedia, a

WP:ORIGINAL? The lead of the article should just remain to state that it's the "fifth installment". It being the final game is just what you think and your own idea, which doesn't belong in Wikipedia. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Terasail^[✉] 16:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

In the article about Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 it is written: "Soon after the game was released, it received >>mixed or average reviews<<".

Actually, soon after release the game had positive reviews on XboxX. The scores dropped later. Here you have screen-shot.

http://mickey.ugu.pl/MetaCritic/SGWC2_XboxX.JPG

You can also check the history on metacritic yourself.

You can do it by:

1) finding Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 for XBox X on metacritic;

2) clicking Critic Reviews to get all the critic reviews;

3) click By date.

You can find that soon after publishing the game received two scores of 80, one of 85 and one score of 70. It was enough to call them positive reviews. The scores dropped 11 days later with the review from IGN. Hence, the version for XBOX X received mostly positive reviews "*Soon after* the game was released," but the average score dropped with the review from IGN. MichalZim (talk) 08:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then we change the wording rather than writing "soon after the game was released". I just didn't change it before. The reception section shouldn't be a chronology (unless there's some specific event like review bombing) and should instead be a summary. It doesn't matter which review came out first or last, early or late. The general reception is still "mixed or average". LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"(Don't simply remove stuff like that, Cuvtixo. Even removing lines that separate the paragraphs. My goodness. You're destroying the page.)"

The page has three

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2015)

and one

This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (April 2013)

I think the page probably should be destroyed. Its been 9 years since the "update" was asked for, let's face it, it's never going to be updated. I think the article should be deleted really, don't you? Cuvtixo (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If your reason for the page to be deleted is simply "I don't think it's going to be updated", then it's not a valid reason to delete the page. Not to mention your edits involved removing content and templates, literally reducing the page's size and tags. You're just finding excuses to have the page deleted. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]