Talk:Thirsty Beaver: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review |
277,466 edits promote Thirsty Beaver to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|15:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)|topic=Art and architecture|page=1|oldid=1202815660}} |
|||
{{GA nominee|20:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Bruxton|Bruxton]] ([[User talk:Bruxton|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Agriculture, food and drink|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=Bar in Charlotte, North Carolina}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class= |
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=GA |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States|class= |
{{WikiProject United States|class=GA |importance=Low|NC=yes|NC-importance=|category=}} |
||
{{annual views}} |
{{annual views}} |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 15:43, 3 February 2024
Thirsty Beaver has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 3, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Thirsty Beaver appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
|
|
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Thirsty Beaver/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll have a go at this one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- Ah, what a sad story. I do think the link to "holdout" in the lead should display that word, however. (Could be "[[holdout|held out]] against two offers".)
- No need for "Holdout" in the See also list, by the way, as it's already in use, though you might want to link it once in the article body.
- Not sure the 'Background' / 'History' split really works, as both sections describe the building's history. Most of the material would work in a 'History' section, with the last paragraphs ("The bar ... month.", and "In 2021, ... there.") of each of the two current sections in a 'Features' section.
- I can't see the bras nailed to the entrances, presumably they're inside. Quite the feature.
- Yes to get images I had to ask Flickr editors to change the license on their uploads - none of the interior yet.
- The images run into the References, since the infobox takes up so much space. Might be as well to organize them in a gallery.
- I have created a gallery
- The "side view" is actually a corner or three-quarter viewas it shows the front also.
- I changed the caption to read "mage of the beaver mural"
- Spotchecks are fine. I've marked [7] Sprinkle's link as dead, no worries as it's already archived.
Summary
Well, that's about it from me. All good, basically. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.