Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2006)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Todo
Good work on this. The only todo I can think of is put it up for a GA nom, unless you have other plans first. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't, actually. This is pretty much done, unless NWS Guam gets back to me with more info. Chacor 13:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- GA-nommed. Chacor 04:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Ewiniar Redeemed?
- Hey, I thought everyone merged Ewiniar to the talk) 08:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)]
- We unmerged it because we found a lot of info on the storm after it had died, so we created an article. All the better for Wikipedia, if we can get good-quality articles in. I mean, honestly, which do you think is better, Choice A or Choice B? Chacor 10:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Chacor's right. Articles are too hard to make while they are current. The good stuff comes from after the fact, when we know what the storm is going to do. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- We unmerged it because we found a lot of info on the storm after it had died, so we created an article. All the better for Wikipedia, if we can get good-quality articles in. I mean, honestly, which do you think is better, Choice A or Choice B? Chacor 10:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
GA Passed
Good job everyone. Another hurricane article on the GA list. Tarret 14:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
NCDC
The article should be updated using NCDC info for Guam. They have a damage total and some more info in general. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- [1] Nothing. Guam was never affected by Ewiniar, btw. WFO Guam were involved as their AOR includes CNMI, Micronesia and Palau. – Chacor 15:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- You should have looked at NCDC, as I said. $105,000 in damage, due to storm surge and minor crop damage. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Ewiniar (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://eng.nema.go.kr/sub/cms3/3_3.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Typhoon Ewiniar (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061005234859/http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/natural_hazards_v2.php3?img_id=13687 to http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/natural_hazards_v2.php3?img_id=13687
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060814052349/http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37584&archive=true to http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37584&archive=true
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015026/http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37601&archive=true to http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37601&archive=true
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015352/http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37632&archive=true to http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=37632&archive=true
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/2866/2006/07/12/168%40113304.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)