User talk:Qwerfjkl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Special Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Special Barnstar
Articles for Creation Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Reviewer Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Hacker's Barnstar
Category Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This user has redirect autopatrolled pseudo-rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SchreiberBike (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 17 June 2022 (→‎Bare URL PDF on a talk page?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Discussions

Centralized discussions

Village pump

Village Pump (policy) (19 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (27 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (6 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (14 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (7 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (10 threads)


Administrative noticeboards

Administrators' noticeboard (12 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (36 threads)
Administrative action review (0 threads)
Most recent:
Edit warring noticeboard (6 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread)
Most recent:
Bots noticeboard (1 thread)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (11 threads)


Editors requesting help

Wikipedians looking for help (0 requests)
0 page(s) currently transcluding the {{Help me}} template.


Requests for adminship

Requests for adminship


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—

Talk to my owner
:Online

Recently closed RfAs and RfBs (update)
Candidate Type Result Date of close Tally
S O N %
HouseBlaster RfA Successful 23 Jun 2024 153 27 8 85
Pickersgill-Cunliffe RfA Successful 15 Jun 2024 201 0 0 100
Elli RfA Successful 7 Jun 2024 207 6 3 97
DreamRimmer RfA Withdrawn by candidate 31 May 2024 45 43 14 51
Numberguy6 RfA Closed per
WP:SNOW
27 May 2024 5 23 2 18
ToadetteEdit RfA Closed per
WP:NOTNOW
30 Apr 2024 0 0 0 0

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this user asks you to take precautions:

1. Maintain social distancing by starting new posts in new sections, to avoid contaminating other users.

2. Follow the one-way system by putting new posts at the bottom.

3. Sign your comments to facilitate contact tracing.



Working on Wikidata statements for judges

Hey, I know I reverted your edits, but would like to extend an offer to work with you to get the statements correct. I've been working on Wikidata Every Politician which has similar succession and office holder boundaries.

For positions like the judges replacing another - on the position's talk page (or page of your own) you can create tables from the format I suggested with Template:PositionHolderHistory on Wikidata. Which Talk:Q5589680https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q5589680 is a good example of the extra help it creates to check consistency of start/end and persons replaced or replaced by, but this may not work if there are more than one office holders for the Q (which might be split to seat if able to be distinguished by some differentiation consistently). If you have other questions if your format is correct, I encourage to ping me and/or post to Wikidata:Project_chat. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfgang8741: I ran the edits from OpenRefine, and I still have the files on PAWS (here, if you can view them). I'm not entirely sure what format you want the data in, but from your example at BOTREQ, it appears it needs data other than the successor and judge. By the way, please just ask me to revert my edits, because now I have about 500 notifications. Thanks for taking the time to clean up my mess! ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: Apologies for the excessive notices from the reverts, my first time catching something like this at scale. I do not have permission to view your openrefine, but an example schema config for a position would look more like the following screenshots from openrefine and based on creating this demo you may also need to create some of the positions and clean up some existing Qs for the judge positions. Yes, you probably need to create a few more columns to make a statement that fits both the established practice. I think most positions require a start time which if they were confirmed, but never started the start time would be no value I guess unless the start is at the point of appointment. That is not a nuance I know the answer. It may be that confirmation date needs a new property to represent given the difference between appointed, confirmed, and starting in the role.
A quick look for Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (or similar) didn't exist - now Q111274584 and Q23933765 wasn't linked to the court - checked by viewing What links here.
You can create the position name in plain text in a new column from the table to try to mach what the position should be called and if they don't resolve, create new positions which would be another schema to configure. I'd look to Q20706330 to know what should be added when creating any new instances of judge positions related to a court listed in the table. Ideally the death date column wouldn't include the age as it makes matching less effective.
The new position schema would be a different statement you can export together or do this in two rounds. The first round to create all missing positions then second to add all the statements for persons holding those positions. For each position adding their respective qualifier of "start time" and "end time" as well as "replaces" and "replaced by" qualifiers for the position, the confirmation date (which I don't know a good property to use as a qualifier so you might ask on wikidata project chat) and "appointed by" property also would be a qualifier for the position.
Two more columns are needed on to the table which would include the person the judge replaces for bidirectional movement through the statement and the position that they will hold which is part of the "Court" that you currently have in the table as mentioned above. I hope this helps to clarify a little? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 19:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@
regex to remove the template that gives the age (or just subst it and remove the age).
Two more columns are needed on to the table which would include the person the judge replaces for bidirectional movement - harder to do automatically, though maybe possible in OpenRefine? ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:42, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
clean up some existing Qs for the judge positions - not all existing positions link to their respective court Qid so to get the most out of the linked data, you may need to verify positions link to courts, have applies to jurisdiction values and other cleanup tasks to have consistent statements across the positions. I'm not aware of a model existing for judge positions, but basing off the example cited above it should be a good template of what statements should be on the judge's position.
I think most positions require a start time which if they were confirmed, but never started the start time would be no value I guess unless the start is at the point of appointment. - One the postion held statements require a start time for context of period of time the person was in the role. Though start time is subjective possibly to different interpretation based on the job. Defining what is the start time for a judge and if it is the same or different from when they are confirmed. I'm talking more about how to represent the data. Without a start time the position statement is flagged as missing that qualifier unless the value is set to unknown or no value.
Ideally the death date column wouldn't include the age as it makes matching less effective. - This is more of a comment of table and data design than something hard to cleanup with regex or openrefine split column.
Two more columns are needed on to the table which would include the person the judge replaces for bidirectional movement The infoboxes (if accuracte) could be one source to extract the value or if you have another source at your disposal with this information. This was more of a comment comparing the table to what might be needed to make a more useful statement for the position. Really its not critical, but the more complete the statement the easier it is to query, walk through the links in either direction, visualize, etc. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolfgang8741: I think I'm going to re-generate the table, using updated data, so all rows have a successor. Then, I can get the predecessor, which is typically just above it in the infobox.
I think I've created most of the positions needed. Can you see any that are missing? (I wrote a QuickStatements batch to create a few.) ― Qwerfjkltalk 21:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would help to provide to link(s) to resources you want me to review. I believe you wanted me to look at batch 79292? I don't have anything to compare to for a complete list off hand and courts are not my area of expertise. Format wise for the positions, it would be useful given the defined boundaries to add the position's the jurisdiction with P1001 as well as which court the position is affiliated via P361 of which court ie Q111295760 is part of Q7889771. A query for the list of courts to be part of: https://w.wiki/4yjB When you have the position statements ready, I'll check them out too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfgang8741 (talkcontribs) 21:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolfgang8741: Am I right in saying that P1001 should always be Q30? If not, can you give an example of what it should be? ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, the US is too broad for jurisdiction as these courts either have jurisdiction of an entire state's geographic area or sub region of a state's geographic area. An example would be the Q111295760 the first sentence states the jurisdiction to the entire state of Delaware https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Delaware and appeals to the 3rd circuit as this map shows (not sure if this is most current, but it would be a guide on what Qids might be named or need to be created). While in this case I think the jurisdiction and state area are the same it probably requires a separate Qid to represent the jurisdiction that is equivalent in area to the state of Delaware as it is instance of a jurisdiction rather than instance of a state (so the concepts are similar, but different on type). An example of a jurisdiction only of a portion of a state is the Western District of Washington Q111295799 which would be a part of the state of Washington and a second Qid would represent the Eastern District of Washington. The development of the model for representing the jurisdictions may be better suited for the Wikidata Project Chat discussion.
There would be a relation between the jurisdiction and the state as part of the state of Delaware with different Qids, instance of, and description similar to how electoral districts are sub components of the state, but part of the state. This is where creating new positions have a lot of inter dependencies and deciding how to model can enable teasing out the differences between concepts with the same name, but in doing so allows for much richer queries once the Qids exist. New Qid for the district jurisdictions would probably be an instance of Q5982983 or a subclass of this to specify US district jurisdictional areas as a group or something like this. You might query the instances of this Qid to find what jurisdictions exist and for those that do not, create the Qid for each of the district areas as Q5982983 named the same as Q7889771 (United States District Court for the District of Delaware), but has an instance of Q5982983 or a subclass of Q5982983 being "United States District Court Jurisdiction" which would allow for alternative naming of the jurisdictions as "District of Delaware" with description "jurisdiction of the District Court. I was thinking of the jurisdictions to be modeled similarly to how electoral districts ie Q192611 and modeled, but it may be this concept needs more eyes and would benefit from a modeling discussion on the Wikidata project chat or related Wikidata project. This all said, if this is getting too complex, the jurisdiction can be left off for a later person to complete or put on hold to further discuss how to model them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfgang8741 (talkcontribs) 01:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've created the positions (without P1001) with https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/QSv2T/1648144978238/. ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolfgang8741 ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great, just some cleanup of the duplicates created like Q106071810 and you should be good to add these to the people holding the position with the qualifiers you wanted to add for replaced and replaced by, etc.Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, are the judges you want to create District Court Judges or Court of Appeals Judges? I think the subclass is incorrect. The name of the position d:Q106071810 aka Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York would imply this is a district court judge ie subclass of d:Q58412318 not d:Q58412251. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolfgang8741: Do you know how to replace the property using QuickStatements? I keep on getting errors, and I can't check them as I'm on a mobile device. (List at User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox). ― Qwerfjkltalk 19:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have you looked at Help:QuickStatements#Removing_statements? I haven't batch removed statements before. I'd definitely run test removals on the sandbox first.Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolfgang8741: I think this batch fixed everything. ― Qwerfjkltalk 16:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────────────────┘
Preventing archiving. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover

I've granted page mover per your request at

WP:PERM; guidelines for usage of the right are found at Wikipedia:Page mover. If you have any questions, or in the future decide that you do not intend to use the tool, you can contact me or any other administrator. Hog Farm Talk 20:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

You tagged this category for deletion but it still has 68,291 pages in it so I'm going to remove the tag. The category has to be emptied first and I think you need help from an admin who closes CFD cases for this one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz, I also placed an edit request at Template talk:Infobox musical artist#Template-protected edit request on 18 May 2022, and tagged the template that populates the category for deletion at Template talk:Infobox musical artist/tracking. ― Qwerfjkltalk 06:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard notice

Hello Qwerfjkl, there is a discussion open regarding edits made by your bot at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Controversy_About_Report_Being_Generated_by_Bot. Please see and comment there when you have a moment. — xaosflux Talk 14:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Qwerfjkl,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 811 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 857 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #521

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

CfD closure

I think in this discussion you accidentally moved the nominated category to the wrong target. Can you have another look please? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-21

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Would you mind reversing this closure? Per

WP:BADNAC, A non-admin closure is not appropriate [... when] the outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator. That argument seems to apply here. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The same applies to ‎Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Category:Wikipedians who oppose rebranding the WMF and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Category:Wikipedians assessed by WikiProject Users. I don't think an unexplained no consensus really constitutes a proper closure. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery, Not much I can do for Wikipedians who oppose rebranding the WMF, but I've reverted the rest. ― Qwerfjkltalk 15:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, that was my mistake (I was only intending to challenge the no consensus closures, not the earlier relisting I conflated them with). For what it's worth I don't think the relisting there accomplished anything either, but that's water under the bridge now. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery, the discussions have been closed as no consensus by Fayentic London. ― Qwerfjkltalk 13:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah-Nicole Robles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Sarah-Nicole Robles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creepTalk 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

I don't think you can find an admin who will delete a full category based on a CSD tag. All of the contents of this category need to be recategorized first to the new category, prior to this page being deleted. But you should be familiar with this process since you regularly close CFD discussions now so I'm a little bit confused by your request. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, the pages can't be recategorised because it is the category page; it needs to be deleted so that the other category can be moved in its place. On second thoughts, a round-robin move might have simplified this. ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I know I've disagreed with several of your decisions regarding categories in the past, but still you are doing a very good job at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kay eff cee" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay eff cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay eff cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kay ef cee" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay ef cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay ef cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

Please clarify this CFD close

Hi, please could you expand your close of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_23#Video_games_set_in_a_fictional_location, to specify which parents you merged each deleted category to? E.g. it appears from [6] that you merged Category:Video games set on fictional islands to Category:Video games set on islands, but not also to Category:Works set on fictional islands.

IMHO it would also be appropriate for you to state your rationale for merging to only one parent, as suggested by User:Zxcvbnm, rather than to all parents, as suggested by me.

I have no objection to you processing CFDs manually, as you are leaving a clear edit summary, but feel free to list them instead at

WT:CFDW, so that an admin can then feed the donkey work to a bot. – Fayenatic London 09:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

@Fayenatic london, Looking at it again, if there is consensus to keep Works set on fictional X, then the categories should probably have upmerged to both. I'll fix the closing statement and upmerge to the other categories based on my contributions, though it'll take a while - some of those categories had over 400 pages.
It's mostly easier to manually process them, as with Cat-a-lot I can manage <90 pages in about 20 seconds, so it's easier, although any more than that and I have to wait another minute to avoid the rate limit. Once I remove d ~1300 pages from a category, and that took around half an hour. ― Qwerfjkltalk 11:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Don't feel you have to do that just because I asked, though. There was some weight against my suggestion, and you may be able to find consensus for a single upmerge... but if so, the justification should be documented.– Fayenatic London 12:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, actually, I'll wait until the DRV below finishes. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Video games set on fictional planets. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Masem (t) 14:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #522

Tech News: 2022-22

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1

Read this in another languageSubscription list for the multilingual newsletterLocal subscription list

New editors were more successful with this new tool.

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Query about completed bot task

Hey! Your bot's Task 10 (converting source to syntaxhighlight), understandably, missed a lot of .js and .css pages due to protection. However, I've noticed that quite a lot of the remaining pages have no visible reason for not being edited. They also all seem to be related to documentation of js pages or of source code (E.g. 1 2 3 4 5). Is there any reason these pages seem to have been heavily excluded from Task 10? Aidan9382 (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aidan9382, Might be a flaw in the regex (I know it missed {{#tag:source}}); I ran it on the category. I could always re-run it. ―  Qwerfjkltalk 17:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rerun might be worth it. I didn't even think of {{#tag:source}}. If its fine according to the bot rules, then I think a rerun with #tag could help clear out the last of the fixable (I'm not gonna try clear the category further than that, I don't think an interface admin would be happy to wake up to 400 edit requests ). Aidan9382 (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aidan9382, I'll probably ask the BAG member who closed it if it's okay. I'm sure an interface admin can run the regex on their own account. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah thats alright. If you are gonna use it on an interface admin's account, I'd make sure to be safe you dont overwrite anything thats simply picked up on accident (E.g. a script designed to remove source tags), cause the MW software detection for use of the source tag is fucking ass (At least it was with the enclose attributes on syntaxhighlight which I also cleared recently). The only way to fix that is to add //<nowiki> on the first line and //</nowiki> on the last line (Like here).
I'll also note that most of the errors seem to be by the user scripts, for whatever reason, have // <source lang="javascript"> in them, probably copied wrong. At that point, removing may be a better take. Idk. Other than that though, should be all ok. Aidan9382 (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aidan9382, I've removed most of the remaining ones I can fix (but missed a few #tag:'s). I'll leave a note at WP:Interface administrators' noticeboard ― Qwerfjkltalk 22:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I appreciate it. I did notice some 100 pages got removed from the category yesterday, and theres another 100 gone today. (Don't worry: I'll manually clear whatever's left). Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 05:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sj (18:43, 1 June 2022)

Hi Qwerfjkl :) I'm not new exactly but I'm new to using Special:Homepage... how are you using it, how are you finding the mentorship process? --– SJ + 18:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sj, Mostly I just anwer mentees' questions, which tend to be fairly easy. ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ring system of (136108)) Haumea" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ring system of (136108)) Haumea and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#Ring system of (136108)) Haumea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration


Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello My name is Jules Lee. I need help funding my beautiful curtains that I have designed. People are going to love the curtains that I have designed. Thank you in Advance for your help. --ModernCurtains (talk) 17:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the correct site to fundraise (
WP:NOT). You could try social media instead. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Tech News: 2022-23

02:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #523

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

I'm uncertain about "moving" a category as the contents of the original category haven't been moved over yet. It's been sitting in a CSD category for a few hours now and I recommend contacting an admin who patrols CFD, like Fayenatic london, to handle this category. They do tricky category moves and sometimes it is faster to contact an experienced admin directly and request their help.

Also,

WP:REDNO, has to be avoided. Once a category is emptied, I feel free to carry on with a CSD request. I've noticed that many admins who regularly patrol CSD categories avoid dealing with categories that have been tagged for deletion, even ones that are the result of a valid CFD close to "Delete". Just an observation. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

@Liz, I'm not sure what you mean by @the contents of the original category haven't been moved over yet; I moved the entire contents of Category:Anglican churches in British Columbia to Category:Anglican church buildings in British Columbia. All that needs to be done is delete Category:Anglican church buildings in British Columbia (as a recently-created category) and move Category:Anglican churches in British Columbia (from 2009) in its place. ― Qwerfjkltalk 06:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Harrison bread (02:11, 9 June 2022)

how do i delete everything??????????? --Harrison bread (talk) 02:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrison bread, What do you mean by 'delete everything'? ― Qwerfjkltalk 06:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Hi. Instead of tagging, why not fix. It is not that hard. Cheers, Boghog (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Boghog, I was running a tagging script on a large number of pages to improve Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations' accuracy; filling in bare URLs cannot be done so easily. ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashley Gjøvik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Gjøvik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Gjøvik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sebastien1118 (talk) 09:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An UserBox question.

Why do you need so many UserBoxes? (-_-) is it for work? 186.137.76.153 (talk) 18:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:USERBOXES. I personally.don't have a strong attachment to them, and I'll probably remove the ones on my userpage sometime. ― Qwerfjkltalk 19:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikidata weekly summary #524

Tech News: 2022-24

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors
June 2022 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: our

requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here
.

Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles.

Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from SiERRa662 (16:03, 14 June 2022)

If I need help about someone that is being dishonest in a conversation about keeping a misleading article and they are being extremely bad faith --SiERRa662 (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Test

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Qwerfjkl

Thank you for creating

Sep 1926
.

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Please slow down on the redirects

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Iseult}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Iseult Δx parlez moi 15:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@
WP:AWBREQ thread. What exactly is your objection? ― Qwerfjkltalk 16:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note about recent AWB task

Hey! Do you think you could double check what you have it set to make the redirects have? They have a large amount of spacing before the templates for no seemingly good reason (E.g. here). Thanks. Aidan9382 (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aidan9382, Fixed (don't bother to correct old ones). Also, please don't review my redirects - the bot will do it anyway, and it fills up my watchlist. ― Qwerfjkltalk 16:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks. And I can't review stuff anyways as far as im concerned, so don't worry about that. Aidan9382 (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aidan9382, I left out the #. Now fixed. ― Qwerfjkltalk 16:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, landed yourself an automated AIV report in the process. :D -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URL PDF on a talk page?

(I washed my hands before typing this, so you should be safe.) I saw this edit where you added a {{Bare URL PDF}} to a talk page. I don't think that's right because 1) why mess with talk pages and 2) it adds the page to a category that says it's an article. Does that make sense to you? SchreiberBike | ⌨  15:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]