User talk:Qwerfjkl/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
570		Ore (talk)	Add sources
27		Sedimentary exhalative deposits (talk)	Add sources
47		Heavy mineral sands ore deposits (talk)	Add sources
48		Lateritic nickel ore deposits (talk)	Add sources
261		Copper extraction (talk)	Add sources
949		Aluminium oxide (talk)	Add sources
22		I've Sound (talk)	Cleanup
517		Flame test (talk)	Cleanup
26		Mopani Copper Mines (talk)	Cleanup
133		Mineral processing (talk)	Expand
122		Heap leaching (talk)	Expand
230		Period 2 element (talk)	Expand
27		Jeroo Billimoria (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
94		Stoping (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
569		Solder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,269		Berlin Brandenburg Airport (talk)	Merge
394		Indian government response to the COVID-19 pandemic (talk)	Merge
474		Molar ionization energies of the elements (talk)	Merge
17		Gyratory equipment (talk)	Wikify
60		Biomining (talk)	Wikify
133		Longwall mining (talk)	Wikify
8		Amann & Söhne (talk)	Orphan
27		ROSEN Group (talk)	Orphan
8		Pseudoboehmite (talk)	Orphan
63		Columbite (talk)	Stub
26		Waka Inoue (talk)	Stub
71		Joule per mole (talk)	Stub
77		Beneficiation (talk )	Stub
18		Pressure oxidation (talk)	Stub
6		Magnetation (iron ore) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

It is seen that, you are providing false information through your User Page that you are immortal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishmash Ideas (talk • contribs) 14:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Mishmash Ideas I think that users can assume I am not immortal. ―Qwerfjkltalk 14:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Users can also assume that you are Endymion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishmash Ideas (talk • contribs) 15:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for approving the draft article I wrote. Do you know how to italicise article titles? So for example if you look at Monroe v Hopkins the title is in italics; I need this for Kirkegaard v Smith. Sheldon1567 (talk) 14:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

It's been done for you here; you can use {{italic title}}. ―Qwerfjkltalk 14:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

@Sheldon1567 ―Qwerfjkltalk 15:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

15:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Regarding

• Excellenc1 (talk · contribs)
  • talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Let me first talk about the insufficient context sentence wise.
The Departmental Council of Gard (French: Conseil Départemental du Gard, Occitan: Conselh Departamental de Gard) is the deliberative assembly of the Gard department of France.: This simply mentions that a certain departmental council is a deliberative assembly (a meeting of members who use parliamentary procedure; a smaller version of the parliament) of a certain department in France, link to terms are given for meaning.
It consists of 46 members (general councilors) from 23 cantons and its headquarters are in Nîmes.: This says that the above mentioned council has 46 members elected from 23 cantons of the department and its head office is in the commune of Nimes.
Then comes a list of vice presidents of the council, now cited with 2 self-published reliable sources.
The article as of now has four good citations, and the article can be easily understood by anyone (although I accept the fact that some might not get what a department is). Similar articles on the topic (made by me) were also accepted. (Visit the last few departmental council links on my userpage) Excellenc1📞 11:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Accepted. Please do not use the AfC.process if you have experience in creating articles; it just adds to the backlog. Thanks! ―Qwerfjkltalk 12:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Qwerfjkl I am worried if I do any mistake and get my article speedy deleted, so I still work with the AfC process. Excellenc1📞 13:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I didn't know what do I put as the headline, so sorry if I messed up. Also I don't know if I should ask this on a talk page, so inform me if I shouldn't.
As per your userbox, you have been here for 5 months now. How did you, in this short period of time, become an extended confirmed user, pending changes reviewer, rollbacker, autoconfirmed user, Apprentice Editor (and some other titles)? I have been here for over an year, I still am an editor with just 830 edits. Is it because you knew all about Wikipedia before joining or you were too dedicated to Wikipedia for 5 months? Excellenc1📞 13:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

@

WP:CTIOC (though that is irrelevant and doesn't reflect any experience). Rights are fairly easy to gain if you are eligible, and I have previously done large amounts of anti-vandalism work. Mostly, it comes from the fact that I spend a lot of time on Wikipedia ―Qwerfjkltalk

13:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

As per the edit count here, you have made 20342 edits (in English Wikipedia). But your Service Award Progress says you have 9220 edits. Is it because you didn't update your template? Excellenc1📞 05:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@Excellenc1 Yes. ―Qwerfjkltalk 06:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Just noticed I asked two questions in two different places and you correctly and helpfully answered both. Stuff like this keeps the project's wheels turning. Cheers! talk page 11:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, a few weeks ago, I had a discussion with you on a Wikipedia entry where the changes were rolled back repeatedly (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharampal).

At that time, an analysis showed that the IP-Check-Tool on Wikipedia seemed to identify as violations, publication information (such as book title, author, etc) as well as run of the mill phrases (such as, (i) “…thinker, historian and political philosopher”, (ii) ”… of the cultural, scientific and technological achievements of Indian society on the eve of the British conquest” (iii) “Gandhiji’s call for Individual Satyagraha in October 1940”,).

In light of this discovery, it was concluded that there were no violations of IP or copyright in the changes being made. Today (and yesterday), I have made significant changes to the previous text in order to provide a reasonably comprehensive summary of Dharampal's life and work.

I am burdening you with this information as a measure of precaution intended to prevent a recurrence of a roll-back on the Wiki entry.

Thanks and sorry for the longish message and the bother.

Regards, Dr. JK Suresh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jksuresh (talk • contribs) 20:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your relisting contains a strange relisting comment "Consensus is on merging or deleting". If there is consensus, the discussion should be closed instead of relisted. Or if there is no consensus, you should not make that comment. Or if you agree with merging/deleting you should participate in the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I want to finish that matter with the article as soon as possible .Can you edit the article and improve copyediting and WP-MoS ...yes or no ? if you can't can you provide someone who can and finish this problem ? i dont have the time to continue editing articles anymore if you send me messages that my article has been declined and it has copyediting problems etc... deal ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pun89 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

@Pun89 User:GoingBatty seems to be copyediting it:

• 16:27, 26 July 2021 - «‎Affected areas: copyediting»
• 16:25, 26 July 2021 - «‎Affected areas: copyediting»
• 16:18, 26 July 2021 - «date formats per MOS:DATEFORMAT⇨) by script⇨)»
• 16:17, 26 July 2021 - «fixed infobox image»

―Qwerfjkltalk 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: honestly that button is mad funny and I had to click. Cheers! 107.152.88.2 (talk) 07:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

No problem! ―Qwerfjkltalk 19:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: looking a bit... fishy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banana jellyfish (talk • contribs) 08:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Dear Qwerfjkl,

Thanks for your quick response to my latest edits of Richmond Jay Bartlett. Please clarify what in my article needs more inline citations. I believe that the direct quotes (2) and material needing a footnote have been referenced with inline citations and footnotes in the References section.

I look forward to your advice on this.

Caribou J (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Dear Qwerfjkl,

Thanks for your quick response to my latest edits of Richmond Jay Bartlett. Please clarify what in my article needs more inline citations. I believe that the direct quotes (2) and material needing a footnote have been referenced with inline citations and footnotes in the References section.

I look forward to your advice on this. I am not sure that I responded properly using the "Relisting" hot button, so I am trying again with "Publish changes."

Caribou J (talk) 18:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

@

Wikipedia:EXTERNALLINKS. Thanks! ―Qwerfjkltalk

19:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Caribou J (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

@

verify. I added some ^{[citation needed]} tags to where citations would be helpful. Thanks! ―Qwerfjkltalk

19:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Caribou J (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Qwerfjkl,

Thanks for accepting this article and posting it, but I noted that after you did this, another editor removed the two figures from the revision that you posted. They really are central to the article, are referenced in the text, and illustrate key ideas of Bartlett. Can you put these back in for me, or what is the protocol on this?

Caribou J (talk) 17:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

@

diff? ―Qwerfjkltalk

17:46, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richmond_Jay_Bartlett&diff=next&oldid=1035879933

Thanks, Caribou J (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

@Caribou J Elmidae said the images are 'peripherally related ' in the edit summary. I suggest you discuss any questions on their talk page. ―Qwerfjkltalk 19:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Dear Qwerfjkl,

In re-reading the sections that referred to Fig. 1 & 2, I can see why Elmidae determined that they were peripheral, and I edited out the relevant text. Thanks for all your advice and help in getting this published.

Caribou J (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi

@

Sparklestern By they won't work, do you mean the page was in dark mode or not? ―Qwerfjkltalk

16:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

@

Template:ping for more pinging templates.) ―Qwerfjkltalk

21:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay.

talk

) 23:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: That fish was so funny! I'm sorry, I really am, but I couldn't stop myself. Hope there are no hard feelings…

talk

) 23:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Question about Draft:We Plug Good Music

Hi there, thank you for your review and feedback on the page I'm creating https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:We_Plug_Good_Music

I was following the feedback given from the previous reviewer, who asked me to add more extensive coverage via independent sources, which is why we added more references from Guardian and new references from MTV as well as from Complex. I wasn't trying to do a notability bomb so I appreciate the alert to it.

Would you suggest to remove these references and find others? Or should we find other references to add to what is already cited? Any help would be much appreciated, thank you.

Ayo wpgm (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ayo wpgm You should remove unreliable sources, such as Twitter, Tumblr, and sources related to We Plug Good Music. ―Qwerfjkltalk 11:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl thank you so much, there are Tumblr and We Plug Good Music sources so I'll make sure to do that and also check for other sources like Twitter to remove them as well, thank you for your help Ayo wpgm (talk) 11:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Administrator changes BusterD Kees08 • Nickshanks • Protonk • Schissel • Ultraexactzz • Wknight94

CheckUser changes TheresNoTime Oversighter changes TheresNoTime ST47

Guideline and policy news

• An
  G13
  speedy deletions.

Technical news

• Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

• Following an
  requested move discussions
  .

Miscellaneous

• You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.

Please don't ignore these; although they can be 'stale' it's not always the case. Worth checking the history to see when one was added. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Eagleash I'll admit I didn't see the notice until after I edited the page. ―Qwerfjkltalk 21:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

As an FYI, an article about the subject already existed at Zaki Nusseibeh, so I have redirected the newer creation to the old one. Best, Spencer^T•C 12:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The changes I made to the article more accurately reflect the New York Times article used as the citation by the previous poster. The article cited DOES NOT SUPPORT the conclusions the Wikipedia entry asserts that it does. A quick reading of the article shows that there is no mention, for example, of lockdowns forcing anyone into poverty as the Wikipedia article asserts that New York Time's article concludes. This use of false citations is clearly an attempt by a politically motivated individual to portray the government lockdowns as being detrimental to the American economy and bolstering that claim by citing to a publication that is generally seen as taking an opposing political position. The problem is that the article DOES NOT state what the author of the Wikipedia page claims it does. I took the liberty of amending the statements so they more accurately reflect the content of the source cited so that I can help Wikipedia stop spreading dangerous fake news. 208.125.143.178 (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please read

citing a source. ― Qwerfjkltalk

14:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calciopoli

Under the verdicts section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.239.254.11 (talk • contribs)

• Doesn't matter: such material needs secondary sourcing. Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 13:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Well then doesn't the original reference on Wikipedia have to be removed? Let's try to use some logic here. If the original reference is left on wikipedia then it must have a secondary source. Right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.239.254.11 (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Then please add the reliable secondary reference after the material, as a

[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) ― Qwerfjkltalk

12:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

In general, don't amend other people's talk page comments. Izno (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm finally going through my backlog of pings. I got to User talk:Qwerfjkl/Archive 2#Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories. It is quite annoying that declines collapse the whole box. Maybe we should recommend that if reviewers want the requesting user to answer a question or clarify something, they should use the "Comment" action, reserving the "Decline" action for hopeless requests? Enterprisey (talk!) 07:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Enterprisey Most requesting users don't check back, so it would have to be declined after an acceptable period of time. It would be preferable if a message similar to the normal AfC one could be posted on their talk page. ― Qwerfjkltalk 08:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hm. It doesn't look like the script leaves any user talk page messages at the moment - does that match your observations? If that's true, we should probably come up with some. I have no idea how the process has survived until now like this... Enterprisey (talk!) 08:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Enterprisey Yes, the script has never left a talk page message. ― Qwerfjkltalk 09:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

16:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

@Liz Thanks a lot for correcting me! I will probably come back to CfD renaming later (after gaining experience), and I will be forced to continue to use the script (Cat-a-lot) instead of the bot, which I believe requires admin rights. ― Qwerfjkltalk 21:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, why did you decline my Category:Song recordings produced by Nav (rapper)? Examples include “Back to Back” by Drake, “What You Want” by Belly, “Myself” by Nav, and a lot of others. You can look these songs up on Tidal. Nav produced all these songs. You said there is no song recordings.

Category:Song recordings produced by Nav (rapper) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.17.32.159 (talk) 21:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

WP:AFCRC. Please use 'songs" not 'song recordings ', and use [[:Category:Example]] when linking to a category. Qwerfjkltalk

21:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Neither the source nor the target section makes any mention of Discoverers 40-44. ― Qwerfjkltalk 11:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

You recently (14 Aug) helped get my sandbox page published as a Wikipedia page. Thank you! However, my sandbox page is now a non-function page referring to this removal. How do I get back my old, functional sandbox page with its history of my additions? Again, thank you. (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@

Wikipedia:History merge. ― Qwerfjkltalk

18:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfik1 There must be a way to open up my sandbox page. Otherwise, I cannot add to Wikipedia pages or create new pages. When I go to Wikipedia:History merge, the istructions for repair are not clear, do not seem to apply to my specific problem, and warn not to follow instructions unless you are sure they apply to your problem. Please, please try to help me here. Should I go to another site for help? I had this problem once before, asked for help, and someone cleared it up for me. What site do you recommend I go to for help? Thanks! (talk) 24:31 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Joflaher To start a new article in your sandbox, without the history, navigate to User:Joflaher/sandbox, which will redirect you, then click on the hatnote saying 'Redirected from User:Joflaher/sandbox' (the last link will send you there directly). Then simply edit the page. Alternatively, you can start a new sandbox at User:Joflaher/sandbox 2. If you want to retain the history, you can try asking at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). As a side note, why do you have your signature as a link to your talk page? ― Qwerfjkltalk 19:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@joflaher Thank you for your speedy reply. I will follow your instructions, first tying Wikipdia:village pump (technical). I have contributed to Wikipedia for over 10 years. For most of that time i have had no problem publishing my sandbox page. About a 1-2 years ago, I became busy at my job and made only edits of pages here and there without using my sandbox. Some two months ago, I was free enough to start new pages on my sandbox but could not get them published using the former method. The old sandbox page had a place to get it published but the current sandbox page does not. It has been a real problem for me. I am not used savvy in using Wikipedia's communicating, messaging, and help systems. Could you explain what I need to use to open and close my messages here? Again, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joflaher (talk • contribs) 20:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Joflaher simply sign your comments with 4 tildes: ~~~~ - Qwerfjkltalk 06:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Qwerfjkl,

I see you declined my draft article on Securitize citing need for reliable sources. No worries! I have already cited articles by Bloomberg (definitely a top media outlet), Forbes, and a number of other serious outlets that adhere to journalistic standards. I also believe most statements in the article are backed up by a primary citation. Can you help me understand what else is necessary in order to clear this bar? Happy to revise or wait until better sources are available if necessary. Just seems to me the current sources are already quite credible.

Thank you!

Jebr1976a (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@Jebr1976a Your draft uses a large number of CoinDesk citations, which are not reliable. ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Due to its linear chemical form, potassium hypochlorite is often written KOCl despite convention of putting the higher oxidizing atom at the end of the anion.[16]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Misspelling Wizard (talk • contribs) 20:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Qwerfjkl. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are, can you please make a WikiProject proposal for it (I as an IP, can not make the proposal cause I would be stopped when trying to create the proposal page). @Qwerfjkl: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.238.109 (talk) 13:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm not interested in joining, but I'd be happy to propose this for you. Qwerfjkltalk 14:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you. @Qwerfjkl:— Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.238.109 (talk) 16:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Please help to make my draft in a successful article Bygonetime (talk) 06:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Try

Teahouse. ― Qwerfjkltalk

16:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it's Eldolen (talk) 07:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Eldolen. Thank you for providing feedback on the edits I made on Elvenking (band). This message is just to acknowledge that, yes, they needed sound referencing! :) Thank you also for suggesting how to do it, as you know I am new to the community, but I look forward to contributing to it!