Femininity
Femininity is a set of attributes, behaviors, and roles generally associated with
Traits associated with femininity include a variety of social and cultural factors, and often vary depending on location and context.[7] Behavioral traits that are considered feminine include gentleness, empathy, and sensitivity.[8][9] The counterpart to femininity is masculinity.
History
The historical origin of the English word feminine is from the Latin femina meaning "woman" or "female," and literally meant, "she who suckles".[10]
From the Neolithic period to the Bronze Age women were prized for their creative ability to reproduce and were represented as birthing figuriness in almost every prehistoric culture.[11] During the Bronze Age, the birthing figurines diminished drastically and distinct differences emerged in iconography between the male and female. Males were shown with daggers in hunting and warrior scenes, and females were defined simply by their biological attributes. By the Iron Age the roles between masculine and feminine were strongly delineated.[12]
Modern notions of femininity began during the English
Behavior and personality
While the defining characteristics of femininity are not universally identical, some patterns exist.
Femininity is sometimes linked with sex and sexual appeal.[18][19] Sexual passiveness, or sexual reception, is sometimes considered feminine while sexual assertiveness and sexual desire is sometime considered masculine behaviors. [19]
Ann Oakley's sex/gender dichotomy had a considerable influence on sociologists defining masculine and feminine behavior as regulated, policed, and reproduced in our society, as well as the power structures relating to the concepts. Some queer theorists and other postmodernists, however, have rejected the sex (biology)/gender (culture) dichotomy as a "dangerous simplification".[4]
An ongoing debate with regards to
In 1959, researchers such as John Money and Anke Erhardt proposed the neonatal hormone theory, which argued that sexual organs bathe the embryo with hormones in the womb, resulting in the birth of an individual with a male or female brain. This theory, however, remains controversial.[1][21] Later scientific research investigation sex and psychology has shown that gender expectations and stereotype threat affect behavior, and a person's gender identity can develop as early as three years of age. [22][3] Some studies suggest that women tend to perform better on empathy tests than men,[23][24] though others have found no sex differences in empathy.[25][26] Some related studies suggest that empathy performance may be related to the subject's perceived gender identity and gender expectations,[27][21] while other researchers argue that because differences in empathy disappear on tests where it is not clear that empathy is being studied, men and women do not differ in ability, but instead in how empathetic they would like to appear to themselves and others.[28] Simon Baron-Cohen argues that there is a high capacity for empathy in women caused by biological factors,[29] though his studies have been criticized by Cordelia Fine, who argues that there is no evidence for biological behavioral differences.[21] Other researchers, such as Diane F. Halpern, argue that small innate differences are exaggerated socially and culturally to create gender.[30]
Mary Vetterling-Braggin argues that all characteristics associated with femininity arose from early human sexual encounters which were mainly male-forced and female-unwilling, because of male and female anatomical differences.[8] Others, such as Carole Pateman, Ria Kloppenborg, and Wouter J. Hanegraaff, argue that the definition of femininity is the result of how females must behave in order to maintain a patriarchal social system.[18][31]
In Carl Jung's school of analytical psychology, the anima and animus are the two primary anthropomorphic archetypes of the unconscious mind. The anima and animus are described by Jung as elements of his theory of the collective unconscious, a domain of the unconscious that transcends the personal psyche. In the unconscious of the male, it finds expression as a feminine inner personality: anima; equivalently, in the unconscious of the female it is expressed as a masculine inner personality: animus.[32]
Occupational roles
Several stereotypes about women have influenced what occupations are associated with femininity. These stereotypes include that women have a caring nature, have skill at household-related work, have greater manual dexterity than men, are more honest than men, and have a more attractive physical appearance. Occupational roles associated with these stereotypes include: midwife, teacher, accountant, data entry clerk, cashier, salesperson, receptionist, housekeeper, cook, maid, social worker, and nurse.[33]
Early computer programmers were women. This has reversed in recent decades, however, with programming being perceived as a masculine occupation.[34]
In the field of medicine, the role of physician was traditionally seen as masculine, while the role of nurse was considered feminine. These associations are now considered outdated in much of the world, although certain specializations, such as surgery and emergency medicine, are still dominated by a masculine culture.[35]
Leadership is associated with masculinity in Western cultures, and women are perceived less favorably as potential leaders.
Explanations for occupational imbalance
It has been argued that primary sex characteristics of men and women, such as the ability to bear children, caused a historical sexual division of labor and gender stereotypes evolved culturally to perpetuate this division.[9]
The practice of bearing children tends to interrupt the continuity of employment[
Religion
Asian religions
In
In Taoism, the concept of yin represents the primary force of the female half of yin and yang. The yin is also present, to a smaller proportion, in the male half. The yin can be characterized as slow, soft, yielding, diffuse, cold, wet, and passive.[45]
In Judaeo-Christian theology
The
In the
Feminine athleticism
Clothing and appearance
In Western cultures, the ideal of feminine appearance has traditionally included long, flowing hair, light skin, a narrow waist, and little or no body hair or facial hair.[5][50][51] In other cultures, however, these standards may vary. For example, in many parts of the world, underarm hair is not considered unfeminine.[52]
These feminine ideals of beauty have been criticized by feminists and others as restrictive, unhealthy, and racist.
History
Cultural standards vary a great deal on what is considered feminine. For example, in 16th Century France,
In
The typical feminine outfit of aristrocratic women of the Renaissance was an undershirt with a gown and a high-waisted overgown, and a plucked forehead and beehive or turban-style hairdo.[56]
Body alteration
Body alteration is the deliberate altering of the human body for aesthetic or non-medical purpose.[57] One such purpose has been to induce perceived feminine characteristics in women.
For centuries in Imperial China, smaller feet were considered to be a more aristocratic characteristic in women. The practice of foot binding was intended to enhance this characteristic, though it often made walking difficult and painful.[58][59]
In a few parts of Africa and Asia, neck rings are worn in order to elongate the neck. In these cultures, a long neck is characterizes feminine beauty. The rings stretch the vertebrae until a person's neck can no longer support her head. This ironically disabling aspect is particularly troubling to humanitarian aid workers.[60]
-
In China until 1911, tiny, bound feet for women were considered aristocratic and feminine
-
TheKayan people of Burma (Myanmar) associate the wearing of neck ringswith feminine beauty.
Feminist views
Feminist philosophers such as Judith Butler and Simone de Beauvoir contend that femininity and masculinity are created through repeated performances of gender; these performances reproduce and define the traditional categories of sex and/or gender.[61]
Many second-wave feminists reject what they regard as constricting standards of female beauty, created for the subordination and objectifying of women and self-perpetuated by reproductive competition and women's own aesthetics.[62]
Others, such as third-wave feminists and lipstick feminists, argue that feminism shouldn't devalue feminine culture and identity, and that symbols of feminine identity such as make-up, suggestive clothing and having a sexual allure can be valid and empowering personal choices for both sexes.[63][64]
Femininity in men
Men who behave in ways associated with femininity may be called
Femininity is not necessarily related to a man's sexuality, though male femininity is often associated with homosexuality in modern Western culture.[66][67]
The terms femiphobia, effeminophobia, and sissyphobia are sometimes used to describe a generally negative attitude displayed in many societies towards feminine men.[68][69]
See also
- Feminine psychology
- Feminization (sociology)
- Gender studies
- Marianismo
- Nature versus nurture
- Sociology of gender
References
- ^ a b c Reinventing the sexes: the biomedical construction of femininity and masculinity. Race, gender, and science. Indiana University Press. 1997. pp. 171 pages. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Cite uses deprecated parameter|authors=
(help); Unknown parameter|id ISBN=
ignored (help) - ^ Masculinity and Femininity in the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. U of Minnesota Press. 2010. pp. 310 pages. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Cite uses deprecated parameter|authors=
(help); Unknown parameter|id ISBN=
ignored (help) - ^ a b c d Gender, power, and communication in human relationships. Psychology Press. 1995. pp. 366 pages. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Cite uses deprecated parameter|authors=
(help); Unknown parameter|id ISBN=
ignored (help) - ^ a b Sexual politics: an introduction. Edinburgh University Press. 2000. pp. 240 pages. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Cite uses deprecated parameter|authors=
(help); Unknown parameter|id ISBN=
ignored (help) - ^ ISBN 0840032048.
- ^ Gender, Women and Health: What do we mean by "sex" and "gender"?' The World Health Organization
- )
- ^ a b c Vetterling-Braggin, Mary "Femininity," "masculinity," and "androgyny": a modern philosophical discussion
- ^ a b c Worell, Judith, Encyclopedia of women and gender: sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender, Volume 1 Elsevier, 2001, ISBN 0122272463, 9780122272462
- ^ Online Etymology Dictionary
- ^ Encyclopedia Britannica
- ^ Blake, Emma (2005). The archaeology of Mediterranean prehistory. Nashville: Blackwell Publishing. p. 140.
- ^ Allen, Volume 2, The Early Humanist Reformation, Part 1, p. 6.
- ^ ‘Inventing Womanhood’: new book explores origins of femininity
- ^ Encyclopedia of contemporary American culture by Gary W. McDonogh, Robert Gregg, Cindy H. Wong
- ^ Eva Peron: The Myths of a Woman by Julie M. Taylor
- ^ Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences by Meredith M. Kimball
- ^ a b Ria Kloppenborg, Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Female stereotypes in religious traditions, BRILL, 1995, ISBN 9004102906, 9789004102903
- ^ a b Ussher, Jane M. Fantasies of femininity: reframing the boundaries of sex
- ^ Halpern, Diane F, Sex Differences In Cognitive Abilities, 2000
- ^ a b c Fine, Cordelia Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference 2010
- ^ Ann M. Gallagher, James C. Kaufman, Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach, Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN 0521826055, 9780521826051
- ^ Hall Judith A (1978). "Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues". Psychological bulletin 85 (4): 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845
- ^ Judith A. Hall (1984): Nonverbal sex differences. Communication accuracy and expressive style. 207 pp. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- ^ Ickes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: The Guilford Press.
- ^ Klein K. Hodges S. (2001). "Gender Differences, Motivation, and Empathic Accuracy: When it Pays to Understand". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (6): 720–730.
- ^ DM Marx, DA Stapel - Distinguishing Stereotype Threat from Priming Effects: On the Role of the Social Self and Threat-Based Concerns Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006 - arno.uvt.nl
- ^ Schaffer, Amanda, The Sex Difference Evangelists, Slate, July 2, 2008 http://www.slate.com/id/2194486/entry/2194489
- ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon. "The Extreme-Male-Brain Theory of Autism"
- ^ Halpern, Diane F., Sex differences in cognitive abilities, Psychology Press, 2000, ISBN 0805827927, 9780805827927
- ^ Pateman, Carole (1988). The Sexual Contract, Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 207.
- ^ Jung, Carl. The Psychology of the Unconscious, Dvir Co., Ltd., Tel-Aviv, 1973 (originally 1917)
- ^ ISBN 9789221095248.
- ^ Light, Jennifer S. "When Computers Were Women." Technology and Culture 40.3 (1999) 455-483
- )
- ^ Chin, Jean Lau, Women and leadership: transforming visions and diverse voices Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, ISBN 1405155825, 9781405155823
- ^ a b Klenke, Karin, Women and Leadership: A Contextual Perspective , Springer Publishing Company, 2004 ISBN 0826192211, 9780826192219
- ^ a b Eagly, Alice H., Steven J. Karau, Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders, Psychological Review 2002
- ^ Jean Clottes. "Shamanism in Prehistory". Bradshaw foundation. Retrieved 2008-03-11.
- ^ Karl J. Narr. "Prehistoric religion". Britannica online encyclopedia 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-28.
- ^ Tedlock, Barbara. 2005. The Woman in the Shaman's Body: Reclaiming the Feminine in Religion and Medicine. New York: Bantam.
- ^ Lee, Jung Yong (1973). "Concerning the Origin and Formation of Korean Shamanism". Numen. 20 (2): 135–159.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Oak, Sung-Deuk (2010). "Healing and Exorcism: Christian Encounters with Shamanism in Early Modern Korea". Asian Ethnology. 69 (1): 95–128.
- ^ Sacred Sanskrit words, p.111
- ^ Osgood, Charles E. "From Yang and Yin to and or but." Language 49.2 (1973): 380–412 . JSTOR. 16 Nov. 2008 <http://www.jstor.org/search>.
- ^ Goddesses and the Divine Feminine: A Western Religious History By Rosemary Radford Ruether
- ^ Job. 28:12
- ^ David Winston, The Wisdom of Solomon: a new translation with introduction and commentary, (New York, Doubleday, 1979), p. 194 ISBN 0385016441
- ^ The Kabbalah Of Isaac Luria Glossary
- )
- ^ ISBN 0742514218.
- ISBN 0415214246.
- ISBN 9780073404301.
- )
- ^ Brown, William, Art of shoe making, Global Media, 2007, 8189940295, 9788189940294
- ^ a b Condra, Jill, The Greenwood encyclopedia of clothing through world history: Prehistory to 1500 CE, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2008, ISBN 0313336636, 9780313336638
- ^ What is body modification?
- ^ Binding: Bone Breaking Beauty, August, 2009
- ^ [1]
- ^ http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2007/05/16/bound-by-tradition/
- ^ Butler, J. (1990). ‘’Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity.’’ New York; Routledge.
- ^ http://newhumanist.org.uk/1781
- ^ Scanlon, Jennifer, Bad girls go everywhere: the life of Helen Gurley Brown, Oxford University Press US, 2009, ISBN 0195342054, 9780195342055
- ^ Joanne Hollows; Rachel Moseley (17 February 2006). Feminism in popular culture. Berg Publishers. p. 84. ISBN 9781845202231. http://books.google.com/books?
- ^ cross-dress." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004.
- ^ Why do gays fall for straights? The Advocate, Feb 17, 1998, 72 pages, No. 753, ISSN 0001-8996, Published by Here Publishing
- ^ Pezzote, Angelo Straight Acting: Gay Men, Masculinity and Finding True Love, Kensington Publishing Corp., 2008, ISBN 0758219431, 9780758219435
- ^ Bailey, J. Michael (2003). The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. Joseph Henry Press, ISBN 978-0309084185
- ^ Fellows, Will, A Passion to Preserve: Gay Men as Keepers of Culture, Univ of Wisconsin Press, 2005, ISBN 0299196844, 9780299196844