Sudangphaa
Sudangphaa | |
---|---|
Ahom Kingdom | |
Ahom King | |
Reign | 1397 CE to 1407 CE |
Predecessor | Tyao Khamti |
Successor | Sujangphaa |
Born | Habung |
Died | c. 1407 Ahom kingdom |
Spouse | Sao Nangsheng[1] |
Dynasty | Ahom dynasty |
Father | Tyao Khamti |
Religion | Ahom religion |
Ahom dynasty |
---|
Sudangphaa (1397–1407) was the
Birth and childhood
Sudangphaa was the son of Ahom king
She died after giving birth to a boy and told the Brahman about the real identity of the boy. The Brahman brought up the young prince along with his other children. The young prince took the Brahman and his family as his own and spent his childhood with them.[10][11][12]
Assassination of Tyao Khamti
King Tyao Khamti was horrified to hear of the execution of his favourite wife, especially when a new and impartial inquiry showed that the allegations against her were false. He was, however, too much under the influence of his elder queen to venture to take action against her. This, and his failure to prevent her from committing numerous acts of oppression, irritated the nobles so much that in 1389 CE, they caused him to be assassinated. The notorious elder queen was also put to death and was entombed along with the king in Charaideo.[13][14][15]
Accession to the throne
Since there were no suitable successors to the throne, Chaothai Khum
Reign
Introduction of Hindu religious rituals in Ahom court
Sudangphaa brought with him from the
Suppression of Tipam Chiefs
The Tipam chiefs, who were dissatisfied with the new regime, hatched a plot against the young king. This came to his ears, but instead of at once taking open steps against the conspirators, he caused a stockade for catching elephants to be constructed, and having caught some elephants, invited them to join him in the celebrating the occasion by a feast. When the festivities were in full swing and all suspicion had been allayed, the conspirators were suddenly overpowered and put to death. According to a practice which was common among the Ahoms and many Asiatic tribes, their heads were piled up in a heap as a trophy.[22]
War with Mongkawng
The reasons for the outbreak of war with
The rulers of Mungkang used to consider Sukaphaa and the Ahom dynasty as his kinsmen as both claim to be descendant of Lengdon, the god of heaven and earth. Surumpha, the king of Mungkang, sent a military expedition along with Tai Chulai, led by his minister, Tasim Pou Borgohain. Sudangphaa personally led his army against the invaders and a battle was fought near Kuhiarbari in the Tipam country. Sudangphaa sustained a slight wound from an enemy spear while riding on an elephant at the head of his army in the battlefield, but the battle turned in Ahom's favour and the invaders were defeated. Sudangphaa ordered Nangchukham Borgohain to chase the vanquished enemy, who chased them as far as Patkai hill range. At last, the commander of Mungkang army, Tasim Pou Borgohain, sought peace from Ahom side, to which the commander of Ahom army, Nangchukham Borgohain, agreed. A formal treaty was concluded in 1401 CE, by which the Patkai hill range was fixed as the boundary between the two countries. The meeting of the two Borgohains, who conducted the negotiations for peace, took place on the side of Nongnyang lake, twenty-eight miles south-west of Margherita and statues of them are said to have been carved in the rock there. A solemn oath of amity was sworn, and consecrated by the cutting up of a fowl. The word Patkai is said to be derived from this incident. The full name was Pat-kai-seng-keu, which means "cut-fowl-oath-sworn". The former name of the pass was Dai-kau-rang or "the junction of nine peaks". Nong-nyang means "lake shaking".[26][27][28]
Transfer of capital and Singarigharutha ceremony
After the peace treaty with Mungkang, Sudangphaa decided to transfer his capital from
Expedition against Kamata kingdom
Meanwhile, Tai Sulai, being deprived of his asylum, took refuge with the king of
Subjugation of Tipam, Khamjang and Aiton tribes
The chiefs of Tipam, Khamjang and Aiton tribes rebelled against the authority of Sudangphaa by refusing to pay tribute. It was found that the king of Nara (one of the Shan kingdoms in Upper Burma) was encouraging the rebels. Sudangphaa sent messengers to remonstrate with the king of Nara, who in turn warned the rebel chiefs not to expect any aid from him. This turn of events forced the rebel chiefs to submit to the authority of Sudangphaa.[37]
Death, character and legacy
Sudangphaa died in 1407 after a reign of ten years. In his chronicle about the history of Assam, Gunaviram Barua stated that the king indulged most of his time in pleasure, which is also the reason for his demise at a young age,
See also
- Ahom dynasty
- Assam
- Charaideo
- Sibsagar district
- Singarigharutha ceremony
- Sukaphaa
Notes
- ^ "...Then Chão Nāngsheng, a daughter of the Tipamiā Gohain was married to Chaopha Shudang."Barua 2008, p. 50
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 82
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 36
- ^ Gait 1926, pp. 82–83
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 82
- ^ Rajkumar, Sarbananda,Chutiya, Bhuyan aru Matak Rajya,p.40.
- ^ Guha 1984, p. 73 "Habung was a Chutiya dependency; that still earlier it was an autonomous principality of Brahmins; and that the latter's origins could be traced back to a circa 10th-century copper-plate and grant issued by king Ratnapala"
- ^ Guha 1983, p. 20 "It appears that the novel designation of Barpatragohain was borrowed from the civil list of Habung, where the local ruler, a dependent of the Chutia king, had the title Vrihatpatra"
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 82
- ^ Barua 2008, pp. 56–57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 33
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 297
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 56
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 33
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 297
- ^ Barua 2008, pp. 56–57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 36
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 297
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 36
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 83
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 297
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 80
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Gait 1926, pp. 83–84
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 37
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 82
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 38
- ^ Barua,G.C.,Ahom Buranji,p.50
- ^ E.A Gait wrote in the History of Assam that the name of the Kamata princess was Bhajani while another chroniclers denied it on the ground that Bhajani was the wife of Ahom king Sukhangphaa, Sudangphaa's grandfather
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 83
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 37
- ^ Gait 1926, p. 83
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 58
- ^ Barua 2008, p. 57
- ^ Barbaruah 1981, p. 38
References
- Barbaruah, Hiteswar (1981). Ahomar-Din or A History of Assam under the Ahoms (in Assamese) (1 ed.). Guwahati: Publication Board of Assam.
- Barua, Gunaviram (2008). Assam Buranji or A History of Assam (4 ed.). Guwahati: Publication Board of Assam.
- Gait, E A (1926). A History of Assam (2 ed.). Calcutta: Thackar, Spink and Co.
- Guha, Amalendu (1983). The Ahom Political System: An Enquiry into the State Formation Process in Medieval Assam (1228-1714).
- Guha, Amalendu (1984). Pre-Ahom Roots and the Medieval State in Assam: A Reply.