Sunyatphaa
Sunyatphaa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahom Kingdom | |||||
Ahom King | |||||
Reign | 1670 CE to 1672 CE | ||||
Predecessor | Supangmung | ||||
Successor | Suklamphaa | ||||
Born | Maju Gohain Ahom kingdom | ||||
Died | c. 1672 Charaideo, Ahom kingdom | ||||
| |||||
House | Charingia | ||||
Dynasty | Ahom dynasty | ||||
Father | Namrupia Raja | ||||
Religion | Ahom religion Hinduism |
Ahom dynasty |
---|
Sunyatphaa also Udayaditya Singha was the king of
Ancestry and early life
Udayaditya Singha was the second son of Namrupia Raja, the grandson of Sureng Deoraja,
Accession
Swargadeo
Reign
War with the Mughals
Udayaditya Singha ascended the throne at a time when the Ahom-Mughal war that started during the reign of his elder brother Swargadeo
When the Ahom rejected the proposal of
Fire in the Royal Stores
In 1671 CE, a treasure house at Hilikha, containing a great store of gold and silver, was burnt down. Enquiry showed that the Bharali Barua, the officer in charge of the store-house was responsible for the fire, which was caused by his carelessly leaving a lighted pipe near some inflammable material. As a punishment for his carelessness, Bharali Barua was compelled to smoke elephant's dung.[15]
Dafala expedition
The Dafala tribe was living in the hills to the north of present-day
In May 1672 CE, the
The king threatened to kill
Influence of Paramananda Bairagi on Udayaditya
The later part of Udayaditya's reign was marked by the entry of Paramananda Bairagi or Sannyasi and his influence over the king. Paramananda Sannyasi hailed from Gakulpur near Brindaban. He was also known as Gakulpuri Sannyasi among common Assamese people, owing to his origin from Gakulpur. He had first lived at Hajo with another hermit from Kalitakuchi in
Swargadeo Udayaditya Singha became greatly devoted to Paramananda Sannyasi, and in his eagerness to advance the prestige and influence of Paramananda summoned the twelve Vaishanava Mahantas or religious heads of the Thakuria denomination and asked them to become disciples of the Gakulpuri Sannyasi. The Mahantas protested in a body; and their leaders, the Mahantas of Mayamara, Makajan, Silikhatal and Sesamukh were thrown into prison from where, the king said, they would be released only if they could satisfy him about their spiritual prowess by performing some miracle. The Mahantas replied in one voice,- We are incapable of performing miracles. We pass our days in reciting and hearing the glory of the Great God, and in offering prayers for Your Majesty’s welfare. Except this everything else is beyond our ken. The king reiterated his conviction of the omniscience of his Guru Paramananda and the consequent propriety on the part of the Mahantas to become the Sannyasi's disciples. The Thakuria Mahantas now stood as one man determined to oppose the king's design to convert them to the discipleship of the Paramananda. In this they received the tacit support of the three Gohains who thought that the time for their intervention had arrived.[28]
Anti-Paramananda Movement led by Debera Hazarika
Debera was a member of the Ahom Lukhurakhun clan, and he held the rank of a Hazarika, commander of one thousand men. He was the son of Kharagom, the Ahom officer who had been killed in the Dafala campaign in 1672 CE. Debera was very much enraged by the atrocities committed on the Vaishnava Mahantas by Udayaditya Singha. He resolved to curb the influence of the Sannyasi and preserve the integrity and prestige of the Vaisnava monks of Assam. Being himself a disciple of Makajan Mahanta of the Thakuria denomination, he knelt down before the Mahantas and solicited their blessings for the success of his enterprise, saying,- “Your Holinesses should only bestow upon me the dust of your feet, and I shall do whatever redress is necessary.”[29]
The king got scent of the mischief that was brewing against him and his protégé; and with the object of keeping Debera away from the capital for some time he ordered him to command an expedition against the Mishmi rebels living near Sadiya. Debera was witty enough to understand the real intention of the monarch, and informed the king that he would start on the expedition after three days as he was convalescent at that time having just recovered from polypus of the nose.[30] On that very night, Debera met the three Dangarias and persuaded them to support Sarugohain, the younger brother of Swargadeo Udayaditya Singha, in his attempt to seize the throne. Debera then broached the proposal to Sarugohain who readily accepted the offer. The prince gave vent to his resentment on the conduct of Udayaditya Singha,-“The Bairagi has become to my brother, not a mere hermit, but an object of extreme veneration, the Saheb of his head. The Dangarias have also accepted initiation from the Bairagi, and the twelve Mahantas have been summoned. Justice cannot tolerate this impious situation.” With the help of Debera and his brother Mohan Deka, Ratanpuria Hazarika, Namgila Hazarika and Tairai Dolakasharia Barua, Sarugohain collected one thousand armed followers to assail and surround the royal residence at Haithaguri and seized the person of the reigning monarch.[31][32] Meanwhile, Udayaditya got scent of the conspiracy and at once ordered the gates of the city closed and his brother to be arrested.[33] The conspirators decided that they got no time to lose, and therefore decided to act quickly.
Palace Coup and Udayaditya deposed
In November 1672 CE,
Meanwhile, Sarugohain stationed himself at the king's audience-chamber, and dispatched men to guard the several gates of the palace compound. Debera and Mohan deka removed the ladder leading to the royal apartments. Those who opposed Sarugohain and Debera were instantly put to death. Having besieged Udayaditya Singha in his bed chamber and making it impossible for him to escape,
Death of Udayaditya and Paramananda Sannyasi
On the following day Udayaditya Singha was placed on a sedan and led to Charaideo Hill. His mother beseeched Sarugohain to spare the life of Udayaditya, or kill her along with the deposed monarch. Sarugohain consoled his mother saying that he and his brother would exercise joint domination, he from his headquarters at Garhgaon and Udayaditya from his capital Charaideo. Udayaditya was put to death soon after his arrival in Charaideo. Before he breathed his last he had put a handful of rice in his mouth and said,--“An innocent is being killed! O, Great God, may retribution descend on him who is committing this crime!” [39] Some sources states that the king was poisoned by Debera.[40] The three wives of Udayaditya were also put to death.[41] Udayaditya Singha's Guru, Paramananda Sannyasi, who had unwittingly caused the revolution, was arrested by Sarugohain and Debera. He was subjected to various tortures, insults and humiliations, and later put to death. His corpse was placed on a raft and set adrift on the Dikhow River, as a warning to others who ever schemed to set up a new order.[42][43]
Legacy
Notes
- ^ The Deoraja (as called by the Hindus) was the second son of Suhungmung who is named as either Sureng or Suleng in the Buranjis and as Phichao in the Deodhai's manuscripts. He was the Charing Raja under Suhungmung and the Tipam Raja under Suklenmung. (Gogoi 1968, p. 321)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 46)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, pp. 49–51)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 68)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 188)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 76)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 156)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 157)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 112)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 76)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 77)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 77)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 157)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 78)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 159)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 80)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 80)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 189)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 81)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 189)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 82)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 158)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 82)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 190)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 83)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, pp. 83–84)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 191)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, pp. 84–85)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 85)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 86)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 86)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 191)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 158)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 158)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 192)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, pp. 86–87)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 87)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 192)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 87)
- ^ (Barua 2008, p. 69)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 159)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 88)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 159)
- ^ (Gait 1926, p. 159)
- ^ (Barbaruah 1981, p. 192)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 76)
- ^ (Bhuyan 1957, p. 88)
References
- Barbaruah, Hiteswar (1981). Ahomar-Din or A History of Assam under the Ahoms (in Assamese) (1 ed.). Guwahati: Publication Board of Assam.
- Barua, Gunaviram (2008). Assam Buranji or A History of Assam (4 ed.). Guwahati: Publication Board of Assam.
- Bhuyan, S K (1957). Atan Buragohain and His Times (1 ed.). Guwahati: Lawyers Book Stall.
- Gait, E A (1926) [1906]. A History of Assam (Revised 2nd ed.). Calcutta: Thackar, Spink and Co.
- Gogoi, Padmeshwar (1968), The Tai and the Tai kingdoms, Gauhati University, Guwahati