Surface-conduction electron-emitter display


A surface-conduction electron-emitter display (SED) is a
After considerable time and effort in the early and mid-2000s, SED efforts started winding down in 2009 as LCD became the dominant technology. In August 2010,
Description
A conventional cathode-ray tube (CRT) is powered by an
The SED replaces the single gun of a conventional CRT with a grid of nanoscopic emitters, one for each sub-pixel of the display. The emitter apparatus consists of a thin slit across which electrons jump when powered with high-voltage gradients. Due to the nanoscopic size of the slits, the required field can correspond to a potential on the order of tens of volts. On the order of 3%, a few of the electrons impact with slit material on the far side and are scattered out of the emitter surface. A second field, applied externally, accelerates these scattered electrons towards the screen. Production of this field requires kilovolt potentials, but is a constant field requiring no switching, so the electronics that produce it are pretty simple.
Each emitter is aligned behind a colored phosphor dot. The accelerated electrons strike the dot and cause it to give off light in a fashion identical to a conventional CRT. Since each dot on the screen is lit by a single emitter, there is no need to steer or direct the beam as there is in a CRT. The
SED screens consist of two glass sheets separated by a few millimeters, the rear layer supporting the emitters and the front the phosphors. The front is easily prepared using methods similar to existing CRT systems; the phosphors are painted onto the screen using a variety of
Creating the rear layer with the emitters is a multistep process. First, a matrix of silver wires is printed on the screen to form the rows or columns, an
Modern SEDs add another step that greatly eases production. The pads are deposited with a much larger gap between them, as much as 50 nm, which allows them to be added directly using technology adapted from
Since the screen needs to be held in a vacuum to work, there is a large inward force on the glass surfaces due to the surrounding atmospheric pressure. Because the emitters are laid out in vertical columns, there is a space between each column where there is no phosphor, normally above the column power lines. SEDs use this space to place thin sheets or rods on top of the conductors, which keep the two glass surfaces apart. A series of these is used to reinforce the screen over its entire surface, which significantly reduces the needed strength of the glass itself.[3] A CRT has no place for similar reinforcements, so the glass at the front screen must be thick enough to support all the pressure. SEDs are thus much thinner and lighter than CRTs.
SEDs can have a 100,000:1 contrast ratio.[4]
History
In 2004 Canon signed an agreement with Toshiba to create a joint venture to continue development of SED technology, forming "SED Ltd." Toshiba introduced new technology to pattern the conductors underlying the emitters using technologies adapted from inkjet printers. At the time both companies claimed that production was slated to begin in 2005. Both Canon and Toshiba started displaying prototype units at trade shows during 2006, including 55" and 36" units from Canon, and a 42" unit from Toshiba. They were widely lauded in the press for their image quality, saying it was "something that must be seen to believe[d]."[4]
However, by this point Canon's SED introduction date had already slipped several times. It was first claimed it would go into production in 1999. This was pushed back to 2005 after the joint agreement, and then again into 2007 after the first demonstrations at CES and other shows.
In October 2006, Toshiba's president announced the company plans to begin full production of 55-inch SED TVs in July 2007 at its recently built SED volume-production facility in
In December 2006, Toshiba President and Chief Executive Atsutoshi Nishida said Toshiba was on track to mass-produce SED TV sets in cooperation with Canon by 2008. He said the company planned to start small-output production in the fall of 2007,[7] but they do not expect SED displays to become a commodity and will not release the technology to the consumer market because of its expected high price, reserving it solely for professional broadcasting applications.[8]
Also, in December 2006 it was revealed that one reason for the delay was a lawsuit brought against Canon by Applied Nanotech. On 25 May 2007, Canon announced that the prolonged litigation would postpone the launch of SED televisions, and a new launch date would be announced at some date in the future.[9]
Applied Nanotech, a subsidiary of Nano-Proprietary, holds a number of patents related to FED and SED manufacturing. They had sold Canon a perpetual license for a coating technology used in their newer carbon-based emitter structure. Applied Nanotech claimed that Canon's agreement with Toshiba amounted to an illegal technology transfer, and a separate agreement would have to be reached. They first approached the problem in April 2005.[10]
Canon responded to the lawsuit with several actions. On 12 January 2007 they announced that they would buy all of Toshiba's shares in SED Inc. in order to eliminate Toshiba's involvement in the venture.[11] They also started re-working their existing RE40,062 patent filing in order to remove any of Applied Nanotech's technologies from their system. The modified patent was issued on 12 February 2008.[12]
On 22 February 2007, the
On 25 July 2008, the
In spite of legal success, Canon announced at the same time that the Great Recession was making introduction of the sets far from certain, going so far as to say it would not be launching the product at that time "because people would laugh at them".[10]
Canon also had an ongoing OLED development process that started in the midst of the lawsuit. In 2007 they announced a joint deal to form "Hitachi Displays Ltd.", with
In April 2009 during NAB 2009, Peter Putman was quoted as saying "I was asked on more than one occasion about the chances of Canon's SED making a comeback, something I would not have bet money on after the Nano Technologies licensing debacle. However, a source within Canon told me at the show that the SED is still very much alive as a pro monitor technology. Indeed, a Canon SED engineer from Japan was quietly making the rounds in the Las Vegas Convention Center to scope out the competition."[18]
Canon officially announced on 25 May 2010 the end of the development of SED TVs for the home consumer market,[19] but indicated that they will continue development for commercial applications like medical equipment. On 18 August 2010, Canon decided to liquidate SED Inc.,[20] a consolidated subsidiary of Canon Inc. developing SED technology, citing difficulties to secure appropriate profitability and effectively ending hopes to one day see SED TVs in the home or the room or the living room.
See also
- Comparison of display technology
- Field-emission display
- Organic light-emitting diode
- Quantum dot display
Notes
- ^ Williams, Martyn (19 August 2010). "Canon signals end of the road for SED TV dreams". IDG News Service. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022.
- ^ Toto, Serkan (31 March 2009). "FED: Sony calls it quits, basically burying the technology as a whole". Archived from the original on 19 June 2009.
- ^ a b Fink, Richard. "A closer look at SED, FED technologies" (PDF). EE Times-Asia. No. August 16–31, 2007. pp. 1–4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2011.
- ^ a b Nguyen, Vincent (October 20, 2006). "SED Next-Generation Flat-Screen Display". SlashGear. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Putman, Peter (8 March 2006). "Standing in the shadows". HDTVexpert. Archived from the original on 21 April 2006.
- ^ "Toshiba eyes mass SED TV output in early '08". MarketWatch, Inc. 2006-06-20. Archived from the original on 2007-12-19. Retrieved 2006-09-29.
- ^ Kim, Yun-Hee (2006-12-22). "Toshiba, Canon work on displays". Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Archived from the original on 2016-03-08. Retrieved 2006-12-22.
- ^ Oonishi, Masao (25 December 2006). "SED Won't Become Commodity -- Toshiba's President Nishida Said at Year-End Press Gathering". Nikkei Microdevices. Archived from the original on 3 January 2007.
- ^ "Notice Regarding Launch of SED TVs" (Press release). Canon Inc. 25 May 2007. Archived from the original on 14 December 2007.
- ^ a b c Harding, Robin (2 December 2008). "Canon clear to launch new type of TV". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009.
- ^ "SED Inc. to become wholly owned subsidiary of Canon Inc" (Press release). Canon Inc. 12 January 2007. Archived from the original on 14 January 2007.
- ^ RE40,062
- ^ "Judge rules against Canon in nanotube TV case". CNET. 2007-02-22. Archived from the original on 2007-02-25. Retrieved 2013-08-22.
- ^ "Nano-Proprietary, Inc. Announces Verdict in Canon Litigation". 2007-05-03. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
- ^ "Notice Regarding Litigation with Nano-Proprietary Involving SED". 2007-05-07. Archived from the original on 2007-05-09. Retrieved 2007-05-07.
- ^ "Appeal's Court Ruling on No. 07-50640" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-06-13. Retrieved 2008-07-30.
- ^ "Canon to take majority stake in Tokki for $69 mln". Reuters. 13 November 2007. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021.
- ^ "NAB 2009: The Season Of Their Discontent". 2009-04-27. Archived from the original on 2009-05-02. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
- ^ "Canon to freeze development of home-use SED TVs". Reuters. 25 May 2010. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020.
- ^ "Notice regarding liquidation of subsidiary" (Press release). Canon Inc. 18 August 2010. Archived from the original on 10 May 2012.
Bibliography
Patents
- U.S. Patent RE40,062 Archived 2022-05-06 at the Wayback Machine, "Display device with electron-emitting device with electron-emitting region", Seishiro Yoshioka et al./Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, Filed 2 June 2000, Re-issued 12 Feb 2008
Further reading
- "Funding for organic-LED technology, patent disputes, and more" Archived 2009-06-01 at the Wayback Machine, Nature Photonics, Volume 1 Number 5 (2007), pg. 278