Talk:Émile P. Torres

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Futures studies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Philosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Social and political philosophy Contemporary philosophy

I'll add some more sources, of which there are plenty, but it seems to me that Torres pretty solidly meets the

Based on how it looks now I would have put it up for deletion, but I know that you are an experienced editor and I see the article is brand new, so I figured that you should have more time to build it. ---Avatar317^(talk) 01:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Avatar317: I've added a handful of other sources. Hopefully that's enough to convince you the tag is not necessary. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to state that

That is plainly not true, with the post denigrating Torres as one of a group of "new left conspiracists" and comparing them to the QAnon originators. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, if you read the post, he is not comparing them to QAnon ORIGINATORS. If you read the beginning few paragraphs up to that quote you will see that.

The "conspiracists" point is a difficult one: Is someone who "propagates a conspiracy theory" a "conspiracist"? Or just someone who has behaved badly, as opposed to being a bad person. ---Avatar317^(talk) 22:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone created the TESCREAL article 2023-10-02: History here: [1]

There was quite a bit of discussion about the existent sourcing for that article on its Talk page. [2]

It was deleted after this deletion discussion: [3] ---Avatar317^(talk) 22:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]