Talk:1919 Atlantic hurricane season

1919 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 20, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1851to2007_atl_reanal.txt
  • In 1919 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:46:27, 404 Not Found
  • In 1981 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:56:43, 404 Not Found
  • In 1919 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 02:54:09, 404 Not Found

--

This review is

transcluded from Talk:1919 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 19:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref for the season being among the least active?

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Err, why isn't there a summary on the two June or August TD's and one September TD? And why doesn't the infobox indicate they exist?
• "also did not effect land" - when it's a verb like this, it's "affect", for the last time :P

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "Historical weather maps indicates" - grammar

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "at all times" - according to whom/what?

• According to the person who wrote that report? :P --12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "while located near Marie-Galante, Guadeloupe" - the island is very small, and that location is kinda random. Thus, I don't think you need to specify where on "Guadeloupe", and the next sentence is kinda useless

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• H2's MH sections should probably be just one paragraph

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "An hours later" - eh?

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "Two schooners capsized in the Windward Islands." - it's kinda obvious, but you should add "due to the hurricane"

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "Strong winds lashed the Bahamas, destroyed buildings on Eleuthera and demolishing houses on San Salvador Island." - weird structure/grammar

• Better?--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "At least 27 people drowned aboard a ship." - where?

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• How can there be "considerable damage" near Miami while also "nothing very serious resulted"?

• Hmm, the report actually says something like that, "Considerable local damage was done in Miami and vicinity, although nothing very serious resulted." I'm not sure how I should fix this.--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "Three people drowned in the area. Damage reached approximately $2 million." - merge

• Better?--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "The depression moved northeastward and detached from the stationary front." - if it was attached to the front, how was it a tropical cyclone? TC's are non-frontal by definition
• What was the basis for the peak intensity of H2 or 3? Was it a ship reading? Land pressure/wind report? Ditto for the rest of the storms, really.
• Why does TS 5's infobox say it formed on the 12th, when the prose said it became tropical on the 11th?

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• " Later on November 12, it curved northwestward." - why? And why did it move to the southwest?

It's a decent article, but doesn't quite feel done. Lemme know when you address these comments, and I'll reassess. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hurricanehink, it's been over five weeks since the article was last edited by the nominator. If it isn't ready—and there was a significant edit on October 14—then maybe it's time to start thinking about closing this as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]