Talk:2001 American Memorial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMotorsport Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGermany Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 15:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth on my "to review" list. Johanna(talk to me!) 15:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk) 23:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Bentvfan54321: Yes I am! The page must have been left off my watchlist or something. I will put up comments as soon as I can. Johanna(talk to me!) 00:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Comments
  • Is the infobox file some sort of official image? I can't tell from the file description page.
  • I know absolutely nothing about auto racing, but from the perspective of a casual reader, I can say that I have no idea what "points" are. I'm not sure if it's worth it to briefly explain or not, but just take that into consideration.
  • "the September 11 attacks occurred." This is a bit of an awkward construction--perhaps you can change it up a bit.
  • "The series"? Is this what one refers to CART as?
  • General comment: a few files of some of the important drivers of the race might help spruce the article up a little bit.
  • You can't expect readers to remember which day the Thursday of that week was, so replace that with the date.
  • "The pole position went to de Ferran, who..." Restructure this sentence, particularly the latter half.
  • Split refs into two columns.

@

Bentvfan54321: Wow! This is really an exemplary article. I really don't have much to say. Clear this up and I'll be happy to pass. Johanna(talk to me!) 02:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

@
talk) 12:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Usage of "template:flagathlete" as Manual of Style; redundancies

A few days ago, I noticed that the results of the 2001 American Memorial listed here under "Classification / Race" includes the name of the country of each driver, constructor and engine manufacturer in parenthesis, despite the country itself being already noted through the nation's flag, due to the use of Template:Flagathlete. I proceeded to fix this redundancy through an edit that used a different template, but this edit was reverted under the premise that it "broke the code for the sortable table" (which is fine and fair) "and going against MOS".

I don't really agree with the last part, considering the widely used method in racing pages (especially on IndyCar/CART and other Indy-style events) has been to just use Template:Flagicon for the nations, which allows to see the identity of the country by putting the cursor over the flag, and avoids the redudancy of having the country's name apart from the flag. Due to this being a "good article", it would be helpful to know if this particular page holds itself to a different standard compared to any other racing article (including those under the same "good article" consideration that also uses FlagIcon, i.e: 2011 IZOD IndyCar World Championship), what's the established MOS on this specific issue, and why's only followed on here.

I used flagicon when I originally added the table in and don't recall changing the style personally, although I wouldn't swear that I didn't as it's been a while since the table was first introduced. If it's a concern for you, I suggest bringing it up at
WT:MOTOR, as they'll likely have a preferred convention for making the articles consistent. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]