Talk:2007 Canadian Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article2007 Canadian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 11, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 3, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 8, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 5, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Welcome to F1, Fox?

Is this the first F1 race to be carried on Fox proper in the US? If so, they certainly got their money's worth today. DarkAudit 18:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Results table incorrect

Sutil didn't retire on 42, it was Kubica, who has been missed out from this list. It's a bit complicated and probably someone else will be faster than me at fixing it.--TheTallOne 19:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review comments

here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have
    fair use rationales
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:


Well written article. --Kalyan 13:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Please tell me someone could muster up something better than this. It's not even transparent, it has huge white streaks where someone attempted to cross out the text from this image, and it's been converted from PNG to JPG. This really needs to be replaced, with a much better name than GP.jpg. The359 (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 5

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The non-free image File:Kubica crash.jpg is being used on this article, and between 2007 and a short time ago had a fair use rationale for inclusion here that was identical to that used on the Robert Kubica article. This rationale was removed by user:Hammersoft with the edit summary "group rationales are inappropriate" a short time ago today, shortly after I initiated Wikipedia:Non-free content review#File:Kubica crash.jpg about its use in the Canadian Grand Prix article (the only reason anybody spotted the change, as he didn't inform anyone).

I think there is a very strong case for using the image in this article, so I would encourage you to write a new fair use rationale for the image or it will be removed from this article. I also encourage you to comment at the non-free content review, even if just to say you've written the rationale. Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image in infobox isn't showing up

Can anybody figure out why the image in the infobox doesn't appear, and more importantly, how to fix it? PKT(alk) 17:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've specified an image-size of 300px and the image is now appearing for me (IE9 on Windows 7). DH85868993 (talk) 02:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

I've reverted the first non-functional archive URL and tagged it with {{cbignore}}. I've just deleted the second one (it was insufficiently specific anyway). DH85868993 (talk) 11:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 11:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 Canadian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last paragraph in Race section describing Sato's race

It's a bit of a jumbled mess, grammatically, and is very unclear and difficult to read. I don't feel confident enough to jump in and totally overhaul it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.203.254 (talk) 02:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]