Talk:2009–10 Chelsea F.C. season

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England / Season Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the season article task force. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10|Goal of the Season (2009–10)]] Anchor Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10 links to a specific web page: 2009–10 in English football . [[Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10|Chelsea Player of the Year (2009–10)]] Anchor Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10 links to a specific web page: 2009–10 in English football . [[Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10|Samsung Players' Player of the Year (2009–10)]] Anchor Chelsea Player of the Year#2009–10 links to a specific web page: 2009–10 in English football . Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Hey! Why 2009 FA Community Shield doesn't appear in the table "Appearances and goals"? I think we have to add that because is part of the tournaments that Chelsea played in the current season and Chelsea won that!--Eduardocombe (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think so

Yes you're right. Ricardo Carvalho was named as man of the match in that final of Community Shield. His goal was most helpful for Chelsea's win over Manchester United. But that is not written in the table. At least we have to create subtable.Boyusha (talk) 12:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still a bit new to Wikipedia, but I suggest if we can, we should make the results one expandable table. Each match would be an expandable box, showing only the final score, but expandable to show the goal scorers, bookings, details, etc. Because, come end of the season, with all the match, the page size will be needlessly too long, when it could be made shorter. I go the idea after viewing the

I feel the expandable matches decrease the ease to find information quickly like red cards and hat tricks. We tried it last season and many of us that edit this page voted against it due to this reason. The only thing I would agree to is keeping the goals visible and somehow putting the bookings in a drop down table. While key dates are large now, we will cut them down later in the season along with the season summary. Thanks for the input, I'll talk it over with Chris and the others that edit this page. Yunggunn2k3 (talk)

Attendance at Chelsea v Porto on 15/09/2009 is listed as 39,851. The linked BBC report of the game, this wikipedia page 2009–10_UEFA_Champions_League_group_stage and the Chelsea website http://www.chelseafc.com/page/FixturesAndResults/0,,10268,00.html record the attendance as 39,436. 82.69.59.7 (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009–10 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103092129/http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/1955578 to http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/1955578
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/1873340
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0%2C%2C10268~1924703%2C00.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/1753824
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0%2C%2C10268~1951893%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]