Talk:2020–2022 Taal Volcano eruptions

A news item involving 2020–2022 Taal Volcano eruptions was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 January 2020.

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• 20200112-taal-lightning-185953 872-dc.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that sections 2020–2022_Taal_Volcano_eruptions#Response to new page Response of 2020–2022 Taal Volcano eruptions. the current page are large in the sections. HurricaneEdgar 07:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneEdgar I am actually surprised that the response section is longer than the main eruption itself despite covering three whole years. Personally, I would not agree however, since it is large enough with several sources, I do agree to separate and create a new one. Back in 2020, responses and aid were making rounds in the Internet via memes and news articles, however this year, it seems relatively silent with only journalist wires making moves. I also recommend removing the "Local" from the title since it would surely cover international aid and relations. I worry though about the 'encyclopedic' factors of every entry which might be removed since a lot of these are normal and do not need to be included, ~maybe. --Likhasik (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find the article's scope of eruptions to be too all-encompassing as the succeding eruptive episodes after January 2020 in this sequence is much less significant than the former. Those are completely separate events that just belong in the same cluster. If one looks at the pages of significant events in other volcanoes, minor episodes that precedes and/or succeeds the main event aren't classified as noteworthy. 49.147.241.124 (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]