Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volcanoes
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Volcanoes and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 120 days |
Volcanoes: Canada Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
WikiProject Volcanoes was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 4 October 2010. |
WikiProject Volcanoes
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
kawah-ijen hydrochloric or sulphuric acid?
Needed volcanoes and igneous landforms in North America!
There are lots of these magmatic intrusions (that means
Good article reassessment for Sakurajima
Sakurajima has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Deliberately fraudulent article
Please look at the page: Nodoroc
I am a geologist with the University of Georgua AND part of the family that owns the Nodoroc site. Whoever created this wiki entry is posting factually false information. This is a peat bog NOT a mud volcanon or volcano of any kind. Based on some of the references, I believe I know who might be responsible. He has let it be k iw to me before that he objects to professionals on the basis that we are professionals. Richard Thornton us widely a discredited name in the archeology field and he is in no way a geologist. I really don't have time to edit this whole site. It needs to be deleted. Please advise. GAgeologist (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- MallardTV, as the creator of the mentioned article, do you have anything to say to this? Volcanoguy 17:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dang it. I didn’t know. I’d assume that my sources are too misinformed. MallardTV (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am in no way associated with anyone whom you may assume responsible. I am merely an interested person that frequents Winder. I didn’t know this was factually incorrect and agree it should indeed be taken down. MallardTV (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Or if it would be appropriate since you did start the page, perhaps we could cooperate to edit the existing stem to make an informative page. It actually is a very important geological and cultural site, just not a volcano. 0 2600:1005:B0CE:C9DE:0:A:451F:1701 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)