Talk:2020–21 India–Pakistan border skirmishes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Sourcing

Please reach a

WP:CONSENSUS first before reverting to add contentious material. Figures based on unnamed "military sources" in local newspapers will definitely not go in the infobox (and adding those figures in the infobox with the tagline of 'According to India" is wholly misleading since they are not official claims). Discuss here if they should be in the "article body" (infobox is a clear no go for unofficial media claims), and I think they shouldn't even be in the body because unnamed and no international media has reported on them. Moving the discussion from my Talk page to here for better participation, also pinging Kautilya3 for input. Gotitbro (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

@
ISPR). Since you had doubts about the what the actual claims were. Gotitbro (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
But why you are citing your own research that isn't backed by a source? See
WP:BRD. I will also echo my message which I made here
because it seems that you haven't clarified it yet.
Unless the military or reliable sources dispute the information, you have no reason to ignore reliable sources who are quoting the "military sources".[1]
2 weeks have elapsed, and nobody other than you has disputed these figures provided by "military sources" as confirmed by numerous
WP:RS before edit warring any further. Shankargb (talk) 03:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Are you really
Ctrl+C'ed everywhere. Gotitbro (talk) 07:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for the ping, Gotitbro. I haven't been following this. So I won't offer an opinion.

However, I would note that

WP:DR. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

I answered him on his talk page, see this. I said that it is not a "media claim" since the information comes from "military source". Above discussion is a continuation of that other discussion. Shankargb (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Shankargb: Now we are getting somewhere. Please clarify whether 11 killed/15 injured is an official figure from the Army (or a media speculation) cause I don't see it in the above quote, if not then add/edit exactly what the army has stated ("casualties", "bunkers destroyed" etc.) to the infobox. We need to be exact with what is presented in the infobox. Cheers. Gotitbro (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, the high-quality reliable sources make it clear that these are official figures of Pakistani casualties, derived by the Indian army from intercepts of the Pakistani communications—what then makes you think otherwise? Let me make it perfectly clear that you, as a voluntary contributor of Wikipedia, do not get to impugn the veracity of figures supplied by reliable sources. It's not your job... Shankargb (talk) 01:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@
anonymous source which have no place in an encyclopedia clearly not in the infobox. The statements from the ministry of defence spokesperson provide no exact figures. Unless you can provide an exact quote from the army/government which provides the "11 killed/15 injured" figure I will be removing it from the infobox and replacing it with "several casualties" as is the exact statement by spokesperson Rajesh Kalia. Gotitbro (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
You don't seem to understand how things work. News agencies cite sources, named or unnamed all the time, that does not them less credible. In fact, in this particular instance, they are specific that their sources are military in nature. By advancing such unconvincing arguments, falsely accusing others of patronising you and of non-cooperation in place of focusing on content, I'm afraid you are just driving folks away. If you really believe that you can dismiss reliable sources such as PTI, the largest Asian news agency, and The Tribune as unreliable, then you're better off putting such efforts, however worthwhile, at
WP:RSN
which is thataway, but know this that will only get you so far...
Re: the sources are military in nature bit: here is this India Today source[2] that is even more specific about their sources from whom they derived their figures i.e., the army itself. If these reliable sources believed their sources to be credible and reliable enough, then you, my friend, are a nobody to question the same. That's how things work here. Shankargb (talk) 03:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ceasefire

Indian[1] and Pakistani[2] official sources have stated that at midnight tonight, a ceasefire agreement will come into effect. If anyone has issues with adding this go ahead and ping me. SpicyBiryani (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Joint Statement". PIB India. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
  2. ^ "The Director Generals of Military Operations of India and Pakistan held discussions over the established mechanism of hotline contact". ISPR official website. DG ISPR. Retrieved 25 February 2021.